Hi
I got two open Ports on my Debian-Server and I do not know what they are
standing for:
Open Port: 56851
Open Port: 57216
Any help or hint is greatly appreciated.
Zeno
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 2002-10-17 at 11:30, Zeno Davatz wrote:
Hi
I got two open Ports on my Debian-Server and I do not know what they are
standing for:
Open Port: 56851
Open Port: 57216
try lsof -i | grep 56851
it could help u see what application is listening on that port
--
To
On 17.10.2002 10:56 Uhr, Cristi Banciu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
try lsof -i | grep 56851
it could help u see what application is listening on that port
Thanks for your help. I get:
ywesee@debian:/etc/tinydns/root sudo lsof -i | grep 56851
Password:
httpd 2495 root3u IPv4 630910
On Thu, 2002-10-17 at 11:53, Zeno Davatz wrote:
On 17.10.2002 10:56 Uhr, Cristi Banciu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
try lsof -i | grep 56851
it could help u see what application is listening on that port
Thanks for your help. I get:
ywesee@debian:/etc/tinydns/root sudo lsof -i | grep
I got two open Ports on my Debian-Server and I do not know what
they are
standing for:
Open Port: 56851
Open Port: 57216
try lsof -i | grep 56851
it could help u see what application is listening on that port
also netstat -anp as root will tell you what process is
On Thu, 2002-10-17 at 13:13, Zeno Davatz wrote:
Yes - I think you are right. So that is nothing bad? Obviously Ruby needs to
open that port if it wants to communicate with Apache.
I don't know i something is bad or good on your machine. Only u should
know what apps are running on your machine
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 11:08:11AM +0200, Massimiliano Mirra wrote:
Am I missing something or should a bug be filed?
I would say a bug needs to be fixed (based on your account of
the issue :) Let the maintainer/security team, take a further look into
this..
Javi
--
To
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 09:02:58PM +0100, Karl E. Jorgensen wrote:
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 11:59:44AM -0500, David wrote:
In an attempt to learn more about the workings of gpg, I've been trying
to verify emails from the command line.
When I try to verify a saved message - one which has
On 17.10.2002 11:59 Uhr, Cristi Banciu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, 2002-10-17 at 11:53, Zeno Davatz wrote:
On 17.10.2002 10:56 Uhr, Cristi Banciu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
try lsof -i | grep 56851
it could help u see what application is listening on that port
Thanks for your help. I
On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 08:13:15PM +0200, Noel Koethe wrote:
is it correct that apache and postgresql are still waiting for
a DSA fix?
see:
postgresql #155419
This was fixed a month ago:
http://www.debian.org/security/2002/dsa-165
and #163311
Hmm...I was not aware that the VACUUM bug
hi John,
thanks for your answers :-)
can i safely apply the grsecurity patch?
Yes. It does nothing by default.
is it true too with an apt-get install?
Ivan Rambeau
FranceOnLine
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin Grape [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
15 Oct 2002, Jussi Ekholm wrote:
Still, the connection attempt from localhost to port 111 puzzles me...
Of the top of my head: Do you have any nfs services running on the
machine? I seem to remember sunrpc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Olaf Dietsche olaf.dietsche#[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jussi Ekholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So, what would try to connect to my system's port 16001 and 111
from within my own system? Should I be concerned? Should I expect
the worst? Any insight
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 11:08:11AM +0200, Massimiliano Mirra wrote:
When slapd (LDAP server daemon) is configured to replicate itself to
another server, on each addition/modification to the directory it will
store the changes to be replicated in /var/lib/ldap/replog. This
directory is world
Hi Massimiliano, Matt,
On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 11:15:31AM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
When slapd (LDAP server daemon) is configured to replicate itself to
another server, on each addition/modification to the directory it will
store the changes to be replicated in /var/lib/ldap/replog.
Not sure if this is real.
He's using a hushmail account to post to the lists which is somewhat
suspicious.
He claims to have attached the binary but no one seems to have a copy of it.
Some co-workers and other people have asked for a copy of it without success.
I woudln't be too surprised if
On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 07:15:08PM +0300, Jussi Ekholm wrote:
The same answer as a luser and as a root. What should I deduct from
this? It's just so weird as I'm not running NFS, NIS or any other
thingie that should use this port...
What do you get from:
netstat -ntlp | grep 16001
--
hello,
can i safely apply the grsecurity patch?
if this patch make servers more secure just by apply it (without acl),
why isn it applied by default?
thanks in advance for your answers
;-)
Ivan Rambeau
FranceOnLine
On Thu, 17 Oct 2002 17:53, WebMaster wrote:
hello,
can i safely apply the grsecurity patch?
Yes. It does nothing by default. The patch version in woody has a build bug,
so you'll have to hit it with a stick first:
-8
The problem is in
Hi
I got two open Ports on my Debian-Server and I do not know what they are
standing for:
Open Port: 56851
Open Port: 57216
Any help or hint is greatly appreciated.
Zeno
On Thu, 2002-10-17 at 11:30, Zeno Davatz wrote:
Hi
I got two open Ports on my Debian-Server and I do not know what they are
standing for:
Open Port: 56851
Open Port: 57216
try lsof -i | grep 56851
it could help u see what application is listening on that port
On 17.10.2002 10:56 Uhr, Cristi Banciu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
try lsof -i | grep 56851
it could help u see what application is listening on that port
Thanks for your help. I get:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/etc/tinydns/root sudo lsof -i | grep 56851
Password:
httpd 2495 root3u IPv4
On Thu, 2002-10-17 at 11:53, Zeno Davatz wrote:
On 17.10.2002 10:56 Uhr, Cristi Banciu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
try lsof -i | grep 56851
it could help u see what application is listening on that port
Thanks for your help. I get:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/etc/tinydns/root sudo lsof -i | grep
I got two open Ports on my Debian-Server and I do not know what
they are
standing for:
Open Port: 56851
Open Port: 57216
try lsof -i | grep 56851
it could help u see what application is listening on that port
also netstat -anp as root will tell you what process is
On 17.10.2002 11:59 Uhr, Cristi Banciu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, 2002-10-17 at 11:53, Zeno Davatz wrote:
On 17.10.2002 10:56 Uhr, Cristi Banciu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
try lsof -i | grep 56851
it could help u see what application is listening on that port
Thanks for your help. I
On Thu, 2002-10-17 at 13:13, Zeno Davatz wrote:
Yes - I think you are right. So that is nothing bad? Obviously Ruby needs to
open that port if it wants to communicate with Apache.
I don't know i something is bad or good on your machine. Only u should
know what apps are running on your machine
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 11:08:11AM +0200, Massimiliano Mirra wrote:
Am I missing something or should a bug be filed?
I would say a bug needs to be fixed (based on your account of
the issue :) Let the maintainer/security team, take a further look into
this..
Javi
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 09:02:58PM +0100, Karl E. Jorgensen wrote:
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 11:59:44AM -0500, David wrote:
In an attempt to learn more about the workings of gpg, I've been trying
to verify emails from the command line.
When I try to verify a saved message - one which has
On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 08:13:15PM +0200, Noel Koethe wrote:
is it correct that apache and postgresql are still waiting for
a DSA fix?
see:
postgresql #155419
This was fixed a month ago:
http://www.debian.org/security/2002/dsa-165
and #163311
Hmm...I was not aware that the VACUUM bug
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 11:08:11AM +0200, Massimiliano Mirra wrote:
When slapd (LDAP server daemon) is configured to replicate itself to
another server, on each addition/modification to the directory it will
store the changes to be replicated in /var/lib/ldap/replog. This
directory is world
hi John,
thanks for your answers :-)
can i safely apply the grsecurity patch?
Yes. It does nothing by default.
is it true too with an apt-get install?
Ivan Rambeau
FranceOnLine
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin Grape [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
15 Oct 2002, Jussi Ekholm wrote:
Still, the connection attempt from localhost to port 111 puzzles me...
Of the top of my head: Do you have any nfs services running on the
machine? I seem to remember sunrpc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Olaf Dietsche [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jussi Ekholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So, what would try to connect to my system's port 16001 and 111
from within my own system? Should I be concerned? Should I expect
the worst? Any insight on this issue
On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 07:15:08PM +0300, Jussi Ekholm wrote:
The same answer as a luser and as a root. What should I deduct from
this? It's just so weird as I'm not running NFS, NIS or any other
thingie that should use this port...
What do you get from:
netstat -ntlp | grep 16001
--
Stephan Schmieder [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello,
I`ve just read an article at linuxsecurity.com regrading the ABfrag exploit.
http://www.linuxsecurity.com/articles/intrusion_detection_article-5933.html
Does anyone know something about that one?
I find this part both intersting and
Hi Massimiliano, Matt,
On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 11:15:31AM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
When slapd (LDAP server daemon) is configured to replicate itself to
another server, on each addition/modification to the directory it will
store the changes to be replicated in /var/lib/ldap/replog.
Not sure if this is real.
He's using a hushmail account to post to the lists which is somewhat
suspicious.
He claims to have attached the binary but no one seems to have a copy of it.
Some co-workers and other people have asked for a copy of it without success.
I woudln't be too surprised if
37 matches
Mail list logo
