Re:从网上查询到贵公司的信息

2002-11-26 Thread 高先生
尊敬的debian-security:您好! 从网上查询到贵公司的信息,我们是大路网络国内专业 的网络营销公司。您的企业发展离不开广告宣传,但广告费 用过于高昂,现在使用大路网络营销推广,做千万人的广告、 全面开拓市场、寻求全球买家、疯狂增加销售订单、树立企 业形象、将企业广告投入缩减为零。这一切您都可以在瞬间 做到。现在国内大多数企业已经开始实施自己的网络营销计 划,您还在等什么。详细请访问我们的站点。 邮件营销方案:http://www.yuefeng2000.com/index-e.htm 我们的站点:http://www.yuefeng2000.com [特别注明:

Re:从网上查询到贵公司的信息

2002-11-26 Thread 高先生
×ð¾´µÄdebian-security:ÄúºÃ! ´ÓÍøÉϲéѯµ½¹ó¹«Ë¾µÄÐÅÏ¢£¬ÎÒÃÇÊÇ´ó·ÍøÂç¹úÄÚרҵ µÄÍøÂçÓªÏú¹«Ë¾¡£ÄúµÄÆóÒµ·¢Õ¹Àë²»¿ª¹ã¸æÐû´«£¬µ«¹ã¸æ·Ñ ÓùýÓڸ߰º£¬ÏÖÔÚʹÓôó·ÍøÂçÓªÏúÍƹ㣬×öǧÍòÈ˵Ĺã¸æ¡¢ È«Ã濪ÍØÊг¡¡¢Ñ°ÇóÈ«ÇòÂò¼Ò¡¢·è¿ñÔö¼ÓÏúÊÛ¶©µ¥¡¢Ê÷Á¢Æó ÒµÐÎÏó¡¢½«ÆóÒµ¹ã¸æͶÈëËõ¼õΪÁã¡£ÕâÒ»ÇÐÄú¶¼¿ÉÒÔÔÚ˲¼ä ×öµ

Re: test of non-subscribed user

2002-11-26 Thread Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 09:50:16PM +0100, Thomas Fischer wrote: > hi Ted > > On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 09:19:43AM -0800, Ted Parvu wrote: > > Hmmm, my bad > > > > No need to dredge up an old topic. However, I could > > not find a FAQ for this list? Does one exist? > > > > not a faq, but i

unsubscribe

2002-11-26 Thread ruben . guerra

Re: test of non-subscribed user

2002-11-26 Thread Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 09:50:16PM +0100, Thomas Fischer wrote: > hi Ted > > On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 09:19:43AM -0800, Ted Parvu wrote: > > Hmmm, my bad > > > > No need to dredge up an old topic. However, I could > > not find a FAQ for this list? Does one exist? > > > > not a faq, but i

Re: test of non-subscribed user

2002-11-26 Thread Thomas Fischer
hi Ted On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 09:19:43AM -0800, Ted Parvu wrote: > Hmmm, my bad > > No need to dredge up an old topic. However, I could > not find a FAQ for this list? Does one exist? > not a faq, but i think solutions disscussed here go there: http://www.debian.org/doc/user-manuals#secu

unsubscribe

2002-11-26 Thread ruben . guerra
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: test of non-subscribed user

2002-11-26 Thread Thomas Fischer
hi Ted On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 09:19:43AM -0800, Ted Parvu wrote: > Hmmm, my bad > > No need to dredge up an old topic. However, I could > not find a FAQ for this list? Does one exist? > not a faq, but i think solutions disscussed here go there: http://www.debian.org/doc/user-manuals#secu

Re: filtering between bridge device (br0) and regular ethernet device (ethx)

2002-11-26 Thread Nils Radtke
Hi Marcel, # I ask this question as I often heard that you can't netfilter bridged # devices without special kernel patches (of course I do not need to # filter between eth2 to eth4). But I can filter between the bridge device # and a regular ethx device that is not member of the bridge,

RE: Spammers using a non-existant address as return-path

2002-11-26 Thread Costas Magos
> -Original Message- > From: Robert L. Waite [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 7:30 PM > To: Costas Magos > Subject: Re: Spammers using a non-existant address as return-path > > > On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 07:27:26PM +0200, Costas Magos wrote: > > > > > But, i

RE: Spammers using a non-existant address as return-path

2002-11-26 Thread Costas Magos
> But, is there something I _should_ do in this situation, like > including > some text in the bounce saying that this address has never > existed, and > is being abused by spammers? If yes, _how_ should I do it? I don't know what exactly you should do, i am not aware of the best practices ab

Re: test of non-subscribed user

2002-11-26 Thread Ted Parvu
Hmmm, my bad No need to dredge up an old topic. However, I could not find a FAQ for this list? Does one exist? I have been on this list for a few months now and I find it informative enough to stay subscribed but I have to admit there is a fair amount of noise to which I am now adding. :(

Re: filtering between bridge device (br0) and regular ethernet device (ethx)

2002-11-26 Thread Nils Radtke
Hi Marcel, # I ask this question as I often heard that you can't netfilter bridged # devices without special kernel patches (of course I do not need to # filter between eth2 to eth4). But I can filter between the bridge device # and a regular ethx device that is not member of the bridge,

Re: test of non-subscribed user

2002-11-26 Thread Noah L. Meyerhans
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 08:08:40AM -0800, Ted Parvu wrote: > This is a test to see if a non-subscribed user can > post to the debian security list. > > This is only a test. If you are reading this, then > the answer is yes and that just doesn't seem > right. *plonk* This has been discusse

test of non-subscribed user

2002-11-26 Thread Ted Parvu
This is a test to see if a non-subscribed user can post to the debian security list. This is only a test. If you are reading this, then the answer is yes and that just doesn't seem right. __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affor

RE: Spammers using a non-existant address as return-path

2002-11-26 Thread Costas Magos
> -Original Message- > From: Robert L. Waite [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 7:30 PM > To: Costas Magos > Subject: Re: Spammers using a non-existant address as return-path > > > On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 07:27:26PM +0200, Costas Magos wrote: > > > > > But,

Re:

2002-11-26 Thread Michael Renzmann
Andrea Grandi (LevOn Inf.) wrote: subscribe Does that mean one can send mails to the list without being subscribed? Maybe this should be changed then in order to keep spammers away... just a thought. Bye, Mike

RE: Spammers using a non-existant address as return-path

2002-11-26 Thread Costas Magos
> But, is there something I _should_ do in this situation, like > including > some text in the bounce saying that this address has never > existed, and > is being abused by spammers? If yes, _how_ should I do it? I don't know what exactly you should do, i am not aware of the best practices ab

[no subject]

2002-11-26 Thread Andrea Grandi (LevOn Inf.)
subscribe

Re: test of non-subscribed user

2002-11-26 Thread Ted Parvu
Hmmm, my bad No need to dredge up an old topic. However, I could not find a FAQ for this list? Does one exist? I have been on this list for a few months now and I find it informative enough to stay subscribed but I have to admit there is a fair amount of noise to which I am now adding. :(

Re: test of non-subscribed user

2002-11-26 Thread Noah L. Meyerhans
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 08:08:40AM -0800, Ted Parvu wrote: > This is a test to see if a non-subscribed user can > post to the debian security list. > > This is only a test. If you are reading this, then > the answer is yes and that just doesn't seem > right. *plonk* This has been discusse

test of non-subscribed user

2002-11-26 Thread Ted Parvu
This is a test to see if a non-subscribed user can post to the debian security list. This is only a test. If you are reading this, then the answer is yes and that just doesn't seem right. __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affor

Re:

2002-11-26 Thread Michael Renzmann
Andrea Grandi (LevOn Inf.) wrote: subscribe Does that mean one can send mails to the list without being subscribed? Maybe this should be changed then in order to keep spammers away... just a thought. Bye, Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tr

[no subject]

2002-11-26 Thread Andrea Grandi (LevOn Inf.)
subscribe -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]