--- Kjetil Kjernsmo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Saturday 14 December 2002 22:53, bong sabolboro
> wrote:
> > I am currently implementing a firewall using a
> > notebook and Debian Woody. What is the best place
> to
> > put the firewall rules that I want implemented for
> my
> > local setup?
>
On Saturday 14 December 2002 22:53, bong sabolboro wrote:
> I am currently implementing a firewall using a
> notebook and Debian Woody. What is the best place to
> put the firewall rules that I want implemented for my
> local setup?
Check out the "Securing Debian Manual", specifically section 5.1
> What is the best place to
> put the firewall rules that I want implemented for my
> local setup?
I made them into a script and put them in.
/etc/network/if-pre-up.d
/etc/network/if-post-down.d
--
http://www.torrin.net
I am currently implementing a firewall using a
notebook and Debian Woody. What is the best place to
put the firewall rules that I want implemented for my
local setup?
Do I make a new script in /etc/init.d and make links
to it from the various run levels or do I place them
within network script?
--- Kjetil Kjernsmo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Saturday 14 December 2002 22:53, bong sabolboro
> wrote:
> > I am currently implementing a firewall using a
> > notebook and Debian Woody. What is the best place
> to
> > put the firewall rules that I want implemented for
> my
> > local setup?
>
On Saturday 14 December 2002 22:53, bong sabolboro wrote:
> I am currently implementing a firewall using a
> notebook and Debian Woody. What is the best place to
> put the firewall rules that I want implemented for my
> local setup?
Check out the "Securing Debian Manual", specifically section 5.1
On Sat, Dec 14, 2002 at 02:27:48PM +0100, Matthias Hentges wrote:
> Hello all!
>
> I'm in the process of setting up a dedicated firewall for my home
> network. It only runs four services: smtp, snmp, ssh and fwlogwatch.
(...)
> but snmpd still listens on port 199/tcp (smux) on my internet IP.
(..
> What is the best place to
> put the firewall rules that I want implemented for my
> local setup?
I made them into a script and put them in.
/etc/network/if-pre-up.d
/etc/network/if-post-down.d
--
http://www.torrin.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubsc
Am Sam, 2002-12-14 um 18.42 schrieb Emmanuel Lacour:
> On Sat, Dec 14, 2002 at 02:27:48PM +0100, Matthias Hentges wrote:
[...]
> Can't give you a solution, but just say that this is specific to debian
> > woody (>=snmpd 4.2.2-1 (see changelog)), it doesn't appear in potato.
>
> It seems it's
Am Sam, 2002-12-14 um 18.05 schrieb Phillip Hofmeister:
> On Sat, 14 Dec 2002 at 02:27:48PM +0100, Matthias Hentges wrote:
> > Ofcourse i have a packetfilter installed but i don't want *any* open
> > ports on this firewall.
> >
>
> Without researching for an *actual* solution you can run iptables
I am currently implementing a firewall using a
notebook and Debian Woody. What is the best place to
put the firewall rules that I want implemented for my
local setup?
Do I make a new script in /etc/init.d and make links
to it from the various run levels or do I place them
within network script?
On Sat, Dec 14, 2002 at 02:27:48PM +0100, Matthias Hentges wrote:
> Hello all!
>
> I'm in the process of setting up a dedicated firewall for my home
> network. It only runs four services: smtp, snmp, ssh and fwlogwatch.
(...)
> but snmpd still listens on port 199/tcp (smux) on my internet IP.
(..
Am Sam, 2002-12-14 um 18.42 schrieb Emmanuel Lacour:
> On Sat, Dec 14, 2002 at 02:27:48PM +0100, Matthias Hentges wrote:
[...]
> Can't give you a solution, but just say that this is specific to debian
> > woody (>=snmpd 4.2.2-1 (see changelog)), it doesn't appear in potato.
>
> It seems it's
Am Sam, 2002-12-14 um 18.05 schrieb Phillip Hofmeister:
> On Sat, 14 Dec 2002 at 02:27:48PM +0100, Matthias Hentges wrote:
> > Ofcourse i have a packetfilter installed but i don't want *any* open
> > ports on this firewall.
> >
>
> Without researching for an *actual* solution you can run iptables
On Sat, Dec 14, 2002 at 02:27:48PM +0100, Matthias Hentges wrote:
> Hello all!
>
> I'm in the process of setting up a dedicated firewall for my home
> network. It only runs four services: smtp, snmp, ssh and fwlogwatch.
>
> I've run into a problem configuring snmpd to only use a fixed local IP.
>
On Sat, 14 Dec 2002 at 02:27:48PM +0100, Matthias Hentges wrote:
> Ofcourse i have a packetfilter installed but i don't want *any* open
> ports on this firewall.
>
Without researching for an *actual* solution you can run iptables on
this firewall and drop all incoming connections. Then no packe
On Sat, Dec 14, 2002 at 02:27:48PM +0100, Matthias Hentges wrote:
> Hello all!
>
> I'm in the process of setting up a dedicated firewall for my home
> network. It only runs four services: smtp, snmp, ssh and fwlogwatch.
>
> I've run into a problem configuring snmpd to only use a fixed local IP.
>
On Sat, 14 Dec 2002 at 02:27:48PM +0100, Matthias Hentges wrote:
> Ofcourse i have a packetfilter installed but i don't want *any* open
> ports on this firewall.
>
Without researching for an *actual* solution you can run iptables on
this firewall and drop all incoming connections. Then no packe
Hello all!
I'm in the process of setting up a dedicated firewall for my home
network. It only runs four services: smtp, snmp, ssh and fwlogwatch.
I've run into a problem configuring snmpd to only use a fixed local IP.
>From the man-page it is enough to call snmpd with the following
parameters:
s
Hello all!
I'm in the process of setting up a dedicated firewall for my home
network. It only runs four services: smtp, snmp, ssh and fwlogwatch.
I've run into a problem configuring snmpd to only use a fixed local IP.
>From the man-page it is enough to call snmpd with the following
parameters:
s
20 matches
Mail list logo
