Re: FTP-SSL

Quoting Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > sftp is of value if only because it lets you use lftp fish:// , so you > get a kick-ass ftp client interface with ssh encrypted goodness in the > backend. I quite forgot about the _very_ nice FISH (FIles over SHell) protocol, and have just now been playing

Re: Bind9 stopped after 34 days of uptime

Hey All, I have a machine running a 2.4.20 kernel on deb2.2R5, and bind 9.2.1, uptime of 43 days. I haven't had any issues with bind in this time, but will pop in a note if anything crops up. I have another machine running deb 2.2R5 with a 2.2.19 kernel, and bind 8 (not sure of th

Re: Bind9 stopped after 34 days of uptime

El Jue 26 Dic 2002 13:26, escribió: > Hey All, > I have a machine running a 2.4.20 kernel on deb2.2R5, and bind > 9.2.1, uptime of 43 days. I haven't had any issues with bind in this > time, but will pop in a note if anything crops up. Okay. How much RAM do u have? I have 256 MB here (and 5

Re: Bind9 stopped after 34 days of uptime

As you can all see, my bind9 has been up for some while: 2664 ?S 0:00 /usr/sbin/named -u named 2665 ?S 0:16 \_ /usr/sbin/named -u named 2666 ?S137:29 \_ /usr/sbin/named -u named 2667 ?S 1:04 \_ /usr/sbin/named -u named 2668 ?

Re: Bind9 stopped after 34 days of uptime

On Thu, Dec 26, 2002 at 09:16:12AM -0500, Phillip Hofmeister wrote: > This is on a Pentium 100 MHz with around 32 MB of RAM. The box itself > has been up 134 days. This is the primary internet server for > zionlth.org. Traffic to this domain is modest... I have a feeling that it's possible to m

UNSUBSRIBE

-- -- Michelle Ribeiro Consultoria em Software Livre Campinas - SP

Re: UNSUBSCRIBE

Ops... Only a VAC period. :) -- -- Michelle Ribeiro Consultoria em Software Livre Campinas - SP

Re: FTP-SSL

Quoting Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > sftp is of value if only because it lets you use lftp fish:// , so you > get a kick-ass ftp client interface with ssh encrypted goodness in the > backend. I quite forgot about the _very_ nice FISH (FIles over SHell) protocol, and have just now been playing

Re: Bind9 stopped after 34 days of uptime

Hey All, I have a machine running a 2.4.20 kernel on deb2.2R5, and bind 9.2.1, uptime of 43 days. I haven't had any issues with bind in this time, but will pop in a note if anything crops up. I have another machine running deb 2.2R5 with a 2.2.19 kernel, and bind 8 (not sure of th

Re: Bind9 stopped after 34 days of uptime

El Jue 26 Dic 2002 13:26, escribió: > Hey All, > I have a machine running a 2.4.20 kernel on deb2.2R5, and bind > 9.2.1, uptime of 43 days. I haven't had any issues with bind in this > time, but will pop in a note if anything crops up. Okay. How much RAM do u have? I have 256 MB here (and 5

Re: Bind9 stopped after 34 days of uptime

As you can all see, my bind9 has been up for some while: 2664 ?S 0:00 /usr/sbin/named -u named 2665 ?S 0:16 \_ /usr/sbin/named -u named 2666 ?S137:29 \_ /usr/sbin/named -u named 2667 ?S 1:04 \_ /usr/sbin/named -u named 2668 ?

Re: Bind9 stopped after 34 days of uptime

On Thu, Dec 26, 2002 at 09:16:12AM -0500, Phillip Hofmeister wrote: > This is on a Pentium 100 MHz with around 32 MB of RAM. The box itself > has been up 134 days. This is the primary internet server for > zionlth.org. Traffic to this domain is modest... I have a feeling that it's possible to m

UNSUBSRIBE

-- -- Michelle Ribeiro Consultoria em Software Livre Campinas - SP -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: UNSUBSCRIBE

Ops... Only a VAC period. :) -- -- Michelle Ribeiro Consultoria em Software Livre Campinas - SP -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]