Re: FTP-SSL

Quoting Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): sftp is of value if only because it lets you use lftp fish:// , so you get a kick-ass ftp client interface with ssh encrypted goodness in the backend. I quite forgot about the _very_ nice FISH (FIles over SHell) protocol, and have just now been playing

Re: Bind9 stopped after 34 days of uptime

As you can all see, my bind9 has been up for some while: 2664 ?S 0:00 /usr/sbin/named -u named 2665 ?S 0:16 \_ /usr/sbin/named -u named 2666 ?S137:29 \_ /usr/sbin/named -u named 2667 ?S 1:04 \_ /usr/sbin/named -u named 2668 ?

Re: Bind9 stopped after 34 days of uptime

On Thu, Dec 26, 2002 at 09:16:12AM -0500, Phillip Hofmeister wrote: This is on a Pentium 100 MHz with around 32 MB of RAM. The box itself has been up 134 days. This is the primary internet server for zionlth.org. Traffic to this domain is modest... I have a feeling that it's possible to

Re: UNSUBSCRIBE

Ops... Only a VAC period. :) -- -- Michelle Ribeiro Consultoria em Software Livre Campinas - SP -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: FTP-SSL

Quoting Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): sftp is of value if only because it lets you use lftp fish:// , so you get a kick-ass ftp client interface with ssh encrypted goodness in the backend. I quite forgot about the _very_ nice FISH (FIles over SHell) protocol, and have just now been playing

Re: Bind9 stopped after 34 days of uptime

Hey All, I have a machine running a 2.4.20 kernel on deb2.2R5, and bind 9.2.1, uptime of 43 days. I haven't had any issues with bind in this time, but will pop in a note if anything crops up. I have another machine running deb 2.2R5 with a 2.2.19 kernel, and bind 8 (not sure of

Re: Bind9 stopped after 34 days of uptime

El Jue 26 Dic 2002 13:26, escribió: Hey All, I have a machine running a 2.4.20 kernel on deb2.2R5, and bind 9.2.1, uptime of 43 days. I haven't had any issues with bind in this time, but will pop in a note if anything crops up. Okay. How much RAM do u have? I have 256 MB here (and 512

Re: Bind9 stopped after 34 days of uptime

As you can all see, my bind9 has been up for some while: 2664 ?S 0:00 /usr/sbin/named -u named 2665 ?S 0:16 \_ /usr/sbin/named -u named 2666 ?S137:29 \_ /usr/sbin/named -u named 2667 ?S 1:04 \_ /usr/sbin/named -u named 2668 ?

Re: Bind9 stopped after 34 days of uptime

On Thu, Dec 26, 2002 at 09:16:12AM -0500, Phillip Hofmeister wrote: This is on a Pentium 100 MHz with around 32 MB of RAM. The box itself has been up 134 days. This is the primary internet server for zionlth.org. Traffic to this domain is modest... I have a feeling that it's possible to

UNSUBSRIBE

-- -- Michelle Ribeiro Consultoria em Software Livre Campinas - SP

Re: UNSUBSCRIBE

Ops... Only a VAC period. :) -- -- Michelle Ribeiro Consultoria em Software Livre Campinas - SP