Quoting Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> sftp is of value if only because it lets you use lftp fish:// , so you
> get a kick-ass ftp client interface with ssh encrypted goodness in the
> backend.
I quite forgot about the _very_ nice FISH (FIles over SHell) protocol, and
have just now been playing
Hey All,
I have a machine running a 2.4.20 kernel on deb2.2R5, and bind
9.2.1, uptime of 43 days. I haven't had any issues with bind in this
time, but will pop in a note if anything crops up.
I have another machine running deb 2.2R5 with a 2.2.19 kernel, and
bind 8 (not sure of th
El Jue 26 Dic 2002 13:26, escribió:
> Hey All,
> I have a machine running a 2.4.20 kernel on deb2.2R5, and bind
> 9.2.1, uptime of 43 days. I haven't had any issues with bind in this
> time, but will pop in a note if anything crops up.
Okay. How much RAM do u have? I have 256 MB here (and 5
As you can all see, my bind9 has been up for some while:
2664 ?S 0:00 /usr/sbin/named -u named
2665 ?S 0:16 \_ /usr/sbin/named -u named
2666 ?S137:29 \_ /usr/sbin/named -u named
2667 ?S 1:04 \_ /usr/sbin/named -u named
2668 ?
On Thu, Dec 26, 2002 at 09:16:12AM -0500, Phillip Hofmeister wrote:
> This is on a Pentium 100 MHz with around 32 MB of RAM. The box itself
> has been up 134 days. This is the primary internet server for
> zionlth.org. Traffic to this domain is modest...
I have a feeling that it's possible to m
--
--
Michelle Ribeiro
Consultoria em Software Livre
Campinas - SP
Ops...
Only a VAC period. :)
--
--
Michelle Ribeiro
Consultoria em Software Livre
Campinas - SP
Quoting Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> sftp is of value if only because it lets you use lftp fish:// , so you
> get a kick-ass ftp client interface with ssh encrypted goodness in the
> backend.
I quite forgot about the _very_ nice FISH (FIles over SHell) protocol, and
have just now been playing
Hey All,
I have a machine running a 2.4.20 kernel on deb2.2R5, and bind
9.2.1, uptime of 43 days. I haven't had any issues with bind in this
time, but will pop in a note if anything crops up.
I have another machine running deb 2.2R5 with a 2.2.19 kernel, and
bind 8 (not sure of th
El Jue 26 Dic 2002 13:26, escribió:
> Hey All,
> I have a machine running a 2.4.20 kernel on deb2.2R5, and bind
> 9.2.1, uptime of 43 days. I haven't had any issues with bind in this
> time, but will pop in a note if anything crops up.
Okay. How much RAM do u have? I have 256 MB here (and 5
As you can all see, my bind9 has been up for some while:
2664 ?S 0:00 /usr/sbin/named -u named
2665 ?S 0:16 \_ /usr/sbin/named -u named
2666 ?S137:29 \_ /usr/sbin/named -u named
2667 ?S 1:04 \_ /usr/sbin/named -u named
2668 ?
On Thu, Dec 26, 2002 at 09:16:12AM -0500, Phillip Hofmeister wrote:
> This is on a Pentium 100 MHz with around 32 MB of RAM. The box itself
> has been up 134 days. This is the primary internet server for
> zionlth.org. Traffic to this domain is modest...
I have a feeling that it's possible to m
--
--
Michelle Ribeiro
Consultoria em Software Livre
Campinas - SP
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ops...
Only a VAC period. :)
--
--
Michelle Ribeiro
Consultoria em Software Livre
Campinas - SP
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
14 matches
Mail list logo