ScanMail Message to recipient: eManager settings were matched and action was taken.

2003-08-30 Thread System Attendant
eManager Notification * The following message was blocked because it contains sensitive content. Source mailbox: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Destination mailbox(es): [EMAIL PROTECTED] Rule/Policy: Sexual Discrimination Action: Quarantine to

ScanMail Message to recipient: eManager settings were matched and action was taken.

2003-08-30 Thread System Attendant
eManager Notification * The following message was blocked because it contains sensitive content. Source mailbox: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Destination mailbox(es): [EMAIL PROTECTED];[EMAIL PROTECTED] Rule/Policy: Sexual Discrimination Action: Quarantine to

Re: ScanMail Message to recipient: eManager settings were matchedand action was taken.

2003-08-30 Thread Thomas Horsten
Who are mpuk and why are they censoring debian's mailing list, apparently from several different senders? On Sat, 30 Aug 2003, System Attendant wrote: eManager Notification * The following message was blocked because it contains sensitive content. Source

Re: Debian Stable server hacked

2003-08-30 Thread Adam Majer
On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 10:32:27AM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote: On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 05:23:30PM +0200, Adam ENDRODI wrote: You don't need an executable stack to get control of execution, you only need to be able to change the instruction pointer, which is stored on the stack (as

Re: 2.4.21 IPSEC problems

2003-08-30 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Fri, 29 Aug 2003, Herbert Xu wrote: John Leach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I haven't been able to get Linux to send any ESP packets at all yet. Your setkey command is probably incompatible with your kernel. Try recompiling setkey from the upstream source. If you use the Debian source then

Re: ScanMail Message to recipient: eManager settings were matched and action was taken.

2003-08-30 Thread Neil McGovern
On Sat, Aug 30, 2003 at 12:28:26PM +0100, Thomas Horsten wrote: Who are mpuk and why are they censoring debian's mailing list, apparently from several different senders? Bear in mind that tese message could simply be a result of spam. Neil -- A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of

Re: Eric Allman has changed jobs

2003-08-30 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 10:37:14PM -0400, Noah L. Meyerhans wrote: His autoresponder was replying to a forged message. Not a thing he could do about it. Which is a great reason not to use autoresponders. At all. Either the message was received, in which case there is no need to have an

loggin with iptables, syslog problem

2003-08-30 Thread Rudy Gevaert
Hello, I have the following entry: LOGall -- anywhere anywhere limit: avg 3/hour burst 5 LOG level debug prefix `IPT INPUT packet died: ' and the following thing in syslog.conf ahmed:/var/log# grep kern /etc/syslog.conf kern.*

KerberosV OpenLDAP and PAM

2003-08-30 Thread Matthijs Mohlmann
ey all, I use for authentication KerberosV. For all types of data i use OpenLDAP and for login on into a computer on a network i use PAM. When i use KerberosV then i do so: auth requisite pam_securetty.so auth requisite pam_nologin.so auth required pam_env.so auth sufficient pam_krb5.so

Re: KerberosV OpenLDAP and PAM

2003-08-30 Thread Cajus Pollmeier
On Samstag, 30. August 2003 23:06, Matthijs Mohlmann wrote: ey all, I use for authentication KerberosV. For all types of data i use OpenLDAP and for login on into a computer on a network i use PAM. When i use KerberosV then i do so: auth requisite pam_securetty.so auth requisite

Re: KerberosV OpenLDAP and PAM

2003-08-30 Thread Stephen Frost
* Matthijs Mohlmann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: I use for authentication KerberosV. For all types of data i use OpenLDAP and for login on into a computer on a network i use PAM. [...] Now i want this together. But i don't know how. I've read the documentation from PAM but i don't get it.

ScanMail Message to recipient: eManager settings were matched and action was taken.

2003-08-30 Thread System Attendant
eManager Notification * The following message was blocked because it contains sensitive content. Source mailbox: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Destination mailbox(es): debian-security@lists.debian.org Rule/Policy: Sexual Discrimination Action: Quarantine to

ScanMail Message to recipient: eManager settings were matched and action was taken.

2003-08-30 Thread System Attendant
eManager Notification * The following message was blocked because it contains sensitive content. Source mailbox: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Destination mailbox(es): [EMAIL PROTECTED];debian-security@lists.debian.org Rule/Policy: Sexual Discrimination Action: Quarantine to

Re: ScanMail Message to recipient: eManager settings were matched and action was taken.

2003-08-30 Thread Thomas Horsten
Who are mpuk and why are they censoring debian's mailing list, apparently from several different senders? On Sat, 30 Aug 2003, System Attendant wrote: eManager Notification * The following message was blocked because it contains sensitive content. Source

Re: Debian Stable server hacked

2003-08-30 Thread Adam Majer
On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 10:32:27AM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote: On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 05:23:30PM +0200, Adam ENDRODI wrote: You don't need an executable stack to get control of execution, you only need to be able to change the instruction pointer, which is stored on the stack (as

Re: ScanMail Message to recipient: eManager settings were matched and action was taken.

2003-08-30 Thread Neil McGovern
On Sat, Aug 30, 2003 at 12:28:26PM +0100, Thomas Horsten wrote: Who are mpuk and why are they censoring debian's mailing list, apparently from several different senders? Bear in mind that tese message could simply be a result of spam. Neil -- A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of

Re: Eric Allman has changed jobs

2003-08-30 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 10:37:14PM -0400, Noah L. Meyerhans wrote: His autoresponder was replying to a forged message. Not a thing he could do about it. Which is a great reason not to use autoresponders. At all. Either the message was received, in which case there is no need to have an

loggin with iptables, syslog problem

2003-08-30 Thread Rudy Gevaert
Hello, I have the following entry: LOGall -- anywhere anywhere limit: avg 3/hour burst 5 LOG level debug prefix `IPT INPUT packet died: ' and the following thing in syslog.conf ahmed:/var/log# grep kern /etc/syslog.conf kern.*

KerberosV OpenLDAP and PAM

2003-08-30 Thread Matthijs Mohlmann
ey all, I use for authentication KerberosV. For all types of data i use OpenLDAP and for login on into a computer on a network i use PAM. When i use KerberosV then i do so: auth requisite pam_securetty.so auth requisite pam_nologin.so auth required pam_env.so auth sufficient pam_krb5.so

Re: KerberosV OpenLDAP and PAM

2003-08-30 Thread Cajus Pollmeier
On Samstag, 30. August 2003 23:06, Matthijs Mohlmann wrote: ey all, I use for authentication KerberosV. For all types of data i use OpenLDAP and for login on into a computer on a network i use PAM. When i use KerberosV then i do so: auth requisite pam_securetty.so auth requisite

Re: KerberosV OpenLDAP and PAM

2003-08-30 Thread Stephen Frost
* Matthijs Mohlmann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: I use for authentication KerberosV. For all types of data i use OpenLDAP and for login on into a computer on a network i use PAM. [...] Now i want this together. But i don't know how. I've read the documentation from PAM but i don't get it.

Re: KerberosV OpenLDAP and PAM

2003-08-30 Thread Matthijs Mohlmann
On Sat, 2003-08-30 at 23:37, Cajus Pollmeier wrote: On Samstag, 30. August 2003 23:06, Matthijs Mohlmann wrote: ey all, I use for authentication KerberosV. For all types of data i use OpenLDAP and for login on into a computer on a network i use PAM. When i use KerberosV then i do so: