Quoting Matt Zimmerman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Regarding point #3 in the last message at that URL:
>
> > 3. Multiple recursive gets/puts using ftp is fast, easy, and reliable.
> > Closest http alternative is wget, which is nice but not quite as
> > nice.
>
> lftp http://http.us.debian.or
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> Unfortunately some customers want to pay for a solution where they can just
> use their silly M$ program like they're used to, and refuse 'complicated'
> solutions.
In that case, WebDAV is the way to go, or using WinSCP3 and ssh.
Greetings
Bernd
--
eck
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 04:41:25PM -0700, Rick Moen wrote:
> Quoting Bernd Eckenfels ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > Actually one should think about using FTP at all :)
>
> http://linuxmafia.com/~rick/linux-info/ftp-justification
Regarding point #3 in the last message at that URL:
> 3. Multiple re
Hi Dan (& list)
Quoting Daniel Jacobowitz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> 1.2.0-3 is in incoming, or remove the pam_ftp line.
Thanks! (I've migrated to $other_ftpd for the time being, but will switch
back)
> If you're running something in situations that could be "quite a
> disaster", I suggest you immed
Quoting Robert Brockway ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> If he really cares about the data (and let's face it, everyone cares about
> their data :) then I'd recommend dispensing with ftp entirely and using
> scp or sftp (ssh v2) if the client needs to shift data to or from the box.
> Configure this for RSA/
Quoting Bernd Eckenfels ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Actually one should think about using FTP at all :)
http://linuxmafia.com/~rick/linux-info/ftp-justification
--
Cheers, Founding member of the Hyphenation Society, a grassroots-based,
Rick Moen not-for-profit, locally-owned-and-operated, coo
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> Unfortunately some customers want to pay for a solution where they can just
> use their silly M$ program like they're used to, and refuse 'complicated'
> solutions.
In that case, WebDAV is the way to go, or using WinSCP3 and ssh.
Greetings
Bernd
--
eck
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 04:41:25PM -0700, Rick Moen wrote:
> Quoting Bernd Eckenfels ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > Actually one should think about using FTP at all :)
>
> http://linuxmafia.com/~rick/linux-info/ftp-justification
Regarding point #3 in the last message at that URL:
> 3. Multiple re
Hi Dan (& list)
Quoting Daniel Jacobowitz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> 1.2.0-3 is in incoming, or remove the pam_ftp line.
Thanks! (I've migrated to $other_ftpd for the time being, but will switch
back)
> If you're running something in situations that could be "quite a
> disaster", I suggest you immed
Quoting Robert Brockway ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> If he really cares about the data (and let's face it, everyone cares about
> their data :) then I'd recommend dispensing with ftp entirely and using
> scp or sftp (ssh v2) if the client needs to shift data to or from the box.
> Configure this for RSA/
Quoting Bernd Eckenfels ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Actually one should think about using FTP at all :)
http://linuxmafia.com/~rick/linux-info/ftp-justification
--
Cheers, Founding member of the Hyphenation Society, a grassroots-based,
Rick Moen not-for-profit, locally-owned-and-operated, coo
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> If you're running something in situations that could be "quite a
> disaster", I suggest you immediately rething using the version of
> vsftpd from _unstable_.
Actually one should think about using FTP at all :)
Greetings
Bernd
--
eckes privat - http://
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 12:47:21PM +0200, Robert van der Meulen wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I was working on a newly-installed machine for a customer who requires an
>> ftp server. After installing vsftpd (which i *had* good experience with), I
>> noticed that t
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 12:47:21PM +0200, Robert van der Meulen wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I was working on a newly-installed machine for a customer who requires an
>> ftp server. After installing vsftpd (which i *had* good experience with), I
>> noticed that t
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 10:40:40PM +0400, tokza wrote:
>
> > > I was working on a newly-installed machine for a customer who requires an
> > > ftp server. After installing vsftpd (which i *had* good experience with),
> > > I noticed that the 'anonymous_enable' switch in /etc/vsftpd.conf, when
> >
> > I was working on a newly-installed machine for a customer who requires an
> > ftp server. After installing vsftpd (which i *had* good experience with),
> > I noticed that the 'anonymous_enable' switch in /etc/vsftpd.conf, when
> > set to 'NO' *does* allow anonymous access.
> > Logging in using
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> If you're running something in situations that could be "quite a
> disaster", I suggest you immediately rething using the version of
> vsftpd from _unstable_.
Actually one should think about using FTP at all :)
Greetings
Bernd
--
eckes privat - http://
On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 12:47:21PM +0200, Robert van der Meulen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was working on a newly-installed machine for a customer who requires an
> ftp server. After installing vsftpd (which i *had* good experience with), I
> noticed that the 'anonymous_enable' switch in /etc/vsftpd.conf,
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 12:47:21PM +0200, Robert van der Meulen wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I was working on a newly-installed machine for a customer who requires an
>> ftp server. After installing vsftpd (which i *had* good experience with), I
>> noticed that t
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 12:47:21PM +0200, Robert van der Meulen wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I was working on a newly-installed machine for a customer who requires an
>> ftp server. After installing vsftpd (which i *had* good experience with), I
>> noticed that t
On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 12:47:21PM +0200, Robert van der Meulen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was working on a newly-installed machine for a customer who requires an
> ftp server. After installing vsftpd (which i *had* good experience with), I
> noticed that the 'anonymous_enable' switch in /etc/vsftpd.conf,
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 10:40:40PM +0400, tokza wrote:
>
> > > I was working on a newly-installed machine for a customer who requires an
> > > ftp server. After installing vsftpd (which i *had* good experience with),
> > > I noticed that the 'anonymous_enable' switch in /etc/vsftpd.conf, when
> >
> > I was working on a newly-installed machine for a customer who requires an
> > ftp server. After installing vsftpd (which i *had* good experience with),
> > I noticed that the 'anonymous_enable' switch in /etc/vsftpd.conf, when
> > set to 'NO' *does* allow anonymous access.
> > Logging in using
On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 12:47:21PM +0200, Robert van der Meulen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was working on a newly-installed machine for a customer who requires an
> ftp server. After installing vsftpd (which i *had* good experience with), I
> noticed that the 'anonymous_enable' switch in /etc/vsftpd.conf,
On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 12:47:21PM +0200, Robert van der Meulen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was working on a newly-installed machine for a customer who requires an
> ftp server. After installing vsftpd (which i *had* good experience with), I
> noticed that the 'anonymous_enable' switch in /etc/vsftpd.conf,
Title: tijlN WV
It's funny 'Here's your skateboard' Texas Saturday
in 2003 in 1840 HjT CDC: West Nile dtkm ONnffpg Just a moment! Let's face facts.
Firefighters in 1903 in 1882 in 1842 in 1918
On Sat, 20 Sep 2003, Robert van der Meulen wrote:
> If anyone here is running vsftpd on a non-anonymous box, I'd make sure to
> check this too. In the case of this customer (who has pretty sensitive data
> on his box), this could have been quite a disaster.
If he really cares about the data (and
Title: tijlN WV
It's funny 'Here's your skateboard' Texas Saturday
in 2003 in 1840 HjT CDC: West Nile dtkm ONnffpg Just a moment! Let's face facts.
Firefighters in 1903 in 1882 in 1842 in 1918
On Sat, 20 Sep 2003, Robert van der Meulen wrote:
> If anyone here is running vsftpd on a non-anonymous box, I'd make sure to
> check this too. In the case of this customer (who has pretty sensitive data
> on his box), this could have been quite a disaster.
If he really cares about the data (and
On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 06:34:53AM +0300, Birzan George Cristian wrote:
> When is there going to be a patched version of OpenSSH for stable? Sid
> got the fixed one (3.6.1p2-9), but there's no fixed version for Stable
> on security.debian.org.
I've rolled my own version of this. It can be found at
On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 11:13:35 -0700, Bill Moseley wrote:
> Will Bind9 in stable get the delegation-only patch?
Probably not. Stable only gets updated for security issues.
A Bind9 with the delegation-only patch is available for woody from
http://people.debian.org/~lamont/ .
> I would conside
Am 2003-09-19 08:47:35, schrieb Michel Messerschmidt:
>On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 07:20:08PM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
>Be careful!
>These files are really infected and will infect other ELF binaries if
>you execute them (and if user rights allow it).
>I've done replication tests
Am 2003-09-17 10:48:33, schrieb Oliver Hitz:
>Hi all,
>
>By now probably everybody has heard about Verisign's latest change to
>the .net and .com domains (otherwise read about it in your favourite
>tech news site). While the security of dns per se is not really
>affected, the change influences othe
On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 06:34:53AM +0300, Birzan George Cristian wrote:
> When is there going to be a patched version of OpenSSH for stable? Sid
> got the fixed one (3.6.1p2-9), but there's no fixed version for Stable
> on security.debian.org.
I've rolled my own version of this. It can be found at
On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 11:13:35 -0700, Bill Moseley wrote:
> Will Bind9 in stable get the delegation-only patch?
Probably not. Stable only gets updated for security issues.
A Bind9 with the delegation-only patch is available for woody from
http://people.debian.org/~lamont/ .
> I would conside
Am 2003-09-19 08:47:35, schrieb Michel Messerschmidt:
>On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 07:20:08PM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
>Be careful!
>These files are really infected and will infect other ELF binaries if
>you execute them (and if user rights allow it).
>I've done replication tests
Am 2003-09-17 10:48:33, schrieb Oliver Hitz:
>Hi all,
>
>By now probably everybody has heard about Verisign's latest change to
>the .net and .com domains (otherwise read about it in your favourite
>tech news site). While the security of dns per se is not really
>affected, the change influences othe
37 matches
Mail list logo
