-Original Message-
From: Matt Zimmerman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Zimmerman
Sent: Saturday, June 05, 2004 12:23 PM
To: debian-security@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 02:42:59AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> Has [EMAIL PROTECTED
-Original Message-
From: Matt Zimmerman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Zimmerman
Sent: Saturday, June 05, 2004 12:23 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 02:42:59AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> Has [EMAIL PROTECTED] been directed
hi ya
On Fri, 4 Jun 2004, Michael Stone wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 04, 2004 at 05:26:07PM -0700, Rick Moen wrote:
> >You mean like having extra meanings of the term "vaporware", ones that
> >you alone are aware of? OK.
vaporware is good and bad ...
good, because if its features gets implemented "ri
hi ya
On Fri, 4 Jun 2004, Michael Stone wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 04, 2004 at 05:26:07PM -0700, Rick Moen wrote:
> >You mean like having extra meanings of the term "vaporware", ones that
> >you alone are aware of? OK.
vaporware is good and bad ...
good, because if its features gets implemented "ri
* Emmanuel Lacour:
> For the first time I saw those curious errors. I don't understand where
> is the error, in my bind or in the remote client/server??
>
> Any idea?
>
> Apr 21 22:00:50 volubilis named[12517]: socket.c:1100: unexpected error:
> Apr 21 22:00:50 volubilis named[12517]: internal_sen
* David Stanaway:
> Has anyone else been receiving unusual spam recently which contains no
> content?
Yes, I've seen it, too.
> Is this some spam engine checking MTAs to see if the addresses are
> accepted?
Looks like a mass-mailer bug to me.
--
Current mail filters: many dial-up/DSL/cable mo
On fredag 4. juni 2004, 03:24, s. keeling wrote:
> I'm sick of whitelisting. It doesn't work if you care about
> communicating with people you've never met.
Me too. And I think that most absolutes, whether it is a single rule to
accept an e-mail or a single rule to reject is a Bad Thing[tm]
But
* Emmanuel Lacour:
> For the first time I saw those curious errors. I don't understand where
> is the error, in my bind or in the remote client/server??
>
> Any idea?
>
> Apr 21 22:00:50 volubilis named[12517]: socket.c:1100: unexpected error:
> Apr 21 22:00:50 volubilis named[12517]: internal_sen
* David Stanaway:
> Has anyone else been receiving unusual spam recently which contains no
> content?
Yes, I've seen it, too.
> Is this some spam engine checking MTAs to see if the addresses are
> accepted?
Looks like a mass-mailer bug to me.
--
Current mail filters: many dial-up/DSL/cable mo
Hello, I have a special_offer for you...
WANT TO LOSE WEIGHT?
The most powerful weightloss is now available
without prescription. All natural Adipren720
100% Money Back Guarantée!
- Lose up to 19% Total Body Weight.
- Up to 300% more Weight Loss while dieting.
- Loss of 20-35% abdominal Fat.
- Redu
On fredag 4. juni 2004, 03:24, s. keeling wrote:
> I'm sick of whitelisting. It doesn't work if you care about
> communicating with people you've never met.
Me too. And I think that most absolutes, whether it is a single rule to
accept an e-mail or a single rule to reject is a Bad Thing[tm]
But
Hello, I have a special_offer for you...
WANT TO LOSE WEIGHT?
The most powerful weightloss is now available
without prescription. All natural Adipren720
100% Money Back Guarantée!
- Lose up to 19% Total Body Weight.
- Up to 300% more Weight Loss while dieting.
- Loss of 20-35% abdominal Fat.
- Redu
12 matches
Mail list logo
