missing DSA for python2.2 ?

2004-08-31 Thread Noèl Köthe
Hello, there is a stable update for python2.2 (http://security.debian.org/pool/updates/main/p/python2.2/) available but there is no DSA for python2.2 on the webpage or mailinglist. Is it missing or is the update wrong? thx. -- NoÃl KÃthe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Debian GNU/Linux, www.debian.org s

Re: missing DSA for python2.2 ?

2004-08-31 Thread Martin Schulze
Noèl Köthe wrote: > Hello, > > there is a stable update for python2.2 > (http://security.debian.org/pool/updates/main/p/python2.2/) available > but there is no DSA for python2.2 on the webpage or mailinglist. > > Is it missing or is the update wrong? Hmm, you are correct. I started to send out

Dirk Bonengel ist außer Haus.

2004-08-31 Thread Dirk Bonengel
Ich werde ab 27.08.2004 nicht im Büro sein. Ich kehre zurück am 13.09.2004. Ich werde Ihre Nachricht nach meiner Rückkehr beantworten. In dringenden Fällen wenden Sie sich bitte an Herrn Christian Treml ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) oder Herr Stefan Höfele ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

Abwesenheit

2004-08-31 Thread Sebastian Hennebrueder
Abwesenheit Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren, ich bin in der Zeit vom 21. August bis zum 9. September im Urlaub. In dieser Zeit können Sie sich an Herrn Zander wenden. Telefon 0391 544 56 70 Mit freundlichen Grüßen Sebastian Hennebrüder Leitung eCommerce - Internet --- Grass GmbH, eCommerce - In

Re: apt 0.6 and how it does *not* solve the problem

2004-08-31 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.08.31.0233 +0200]: > > the Debian project as we have it. Bear with me for a second... > > I am not about to take the piss out of the APT 0.6 people, who > > have done an outstanding job. The problem is deeper... > > If the issues you mean to add

Spyware / Adware

2004-08-31 Thread Snyder, Dave (D.F.)
Title: Spyware / Adware Security, I just purchased Debian Linux for my home PC and waiting for the CD's to arrive this week.  I'm looking forward to installing so I can eventually divorce myself from Microsoft Windows. I've had more calls in the last few weeks from friends and relatives re

Re: Spyware / Adware

2004-08-31 Thread Martin Fries
I´m not an expert. Just a normal user. But I think Linux is vulnerable like any other OS. But at this time the risk is not as high as under Windows. In my opinion it depends on how many people are using one specific OS or browser. At home I´ve installed both Windows and Linux. And if you configure

Re: Spyware / Adware

2004-08-31 Thread Volker Tanger
Greetings! On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 13:17:22 +0200 (MEST) "Martin Fries" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I´m not an expert. Just a normal user. But I think Linux is vulnerable > like any other OS. Yes and no. When surfing as normal user *ware programs cannot install themselves as system services or overw

Re: Spyware / Adware

2004-08-31 Thread Sels, Roger
Furthermore, it all depends on your (download) sources. If you install from Debian packages, you should have the implied guarantee that these don't contain backdoors or virii. Of course, if you download some unknown program from a website, apply someone's patches or make any other modifications wi

Re: Spyware / Adware

2004-08-31 Thread Davide Prina
Snyder, Dave (D.F.) wrote: Security, I just purchased Debian Linux for my home PC and waiting for the CD's to arrive this week. I'm looking forward to installing so I can eventually divorce myself from Microsoft Windows. I've had more calls in the last few weeks from friends and relatives rega

Re: Spyware / Adware

2004-08-31 Thread Edward Faulkner
I have been using Linux continuously for 4 years and have never once been infected with a virus, trojan, or adware. It simply doesn't happen. However, I have seen unmaintained machines get hacked. Like any software, you need to stay current to stay safe. Debian has an excellent security record,

Re: Spyware / Adware

2004-08-31 Thread Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder
On Tuesday 31 August 2004 13.30, Volker Tanger wrote: [spyware/adware/trojans/...:] > Yes and no. When surfing as normal user *ware programs cannot install > themselves as system services or overwrite programs simply as you/they > do not have the (file) permissions to do so. Technically, for mos

Re: Spyware / Adware

2004-08-31 Thread Manfred Schmitt
Davide Prina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Under GNU/Linux I never see a program with some Adware/Spyware, all > program I have see are free software, but all come with source so it is > very hard to hide a SpyWare or an Adware. > > So I think that GNU/Linux is free of this type of pests if yo

Dirk Bonengel ist außer Haus.

2004-08-31 Thread Dirk Bonengel
Ich werde ab 27.08.2004 nicht im Büro sein. Ich kehre zurück am 13.09.2004. Ich werde Ihre Nachricht nach meiner Rückkehr beantworten. In dringenden Fällen wenden Sie sich bitte an Herrn Christian Treml ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) oder Herr Stefan Höfele ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

Abwesenheit

2004-08-31 Thread Sebastian Hennebrueder
Abwesenheit Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren, ich bin in der Zeit vom 21. August bis zum 9. September im Urlaub. In dieser Zeit können Sie sich an Herrn Zander wenden. Telefon 0391 544 56 70 Mit freundlichen Grüßen Sebastian Hennebrüder Leitung eCommerce - Internet --- Grass GmbH, eCommerce - In

Re: Spyware / Adware

2004-08-31 Thread Jim Richardson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 16:50:09 +0200, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --nextPart1758276.ghG6qVoQ34 > Content-Type: text/plain; > charset="iso-8859-1" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > Content-Disposition

Re: apache / exe process taking 99 % cpu

2004-08-31 Thread Timo Veith
On Tuesday 31 August 2004 03:24, Marcin Owsiany wrote: > On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 12:59:48AM +0200, Timo Veith wrote: > > On Monday 30 August 2004 21:06, Marcin Owsiany wrote: > > I added a iptables rule to the OUTPUT chain dropping all tcp packets to > > that box:port and guess what? My server was

Re: apache / exe process taking 99 % cpu

2004-08-31 Thread Steve Kemp
On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 12:25:19AM +0200, Timo Veith wrote: > > I seems to be a php issue. I > searched through all php files that "include" or "fopen" something ... > whew there are way too many. > > Any ideas ? If you have pristine logfiles for apache you might want to look for suspicious

Re: apache / exe process taking 99 % cpu

2004-08-31 Thread Marcin Owsiany
On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 12:25:19AM +0200, Timo Veith wrote: > On Tuesday 31 August 2004 03:24, Marcin Owsiany wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 12:59:48AM +0200, Timo Veith wrote: > > > On Monday 30 August 2004 21:06, Marcin Owsiany wrote: > > > I added a iptables rule to the OUTPUT chain dropping

Re: apache / exe process taking 99 % cpu

2004-08-31 Thread Timo Veith
Am Wednesday, 1. September 2004 01:32 schrieb Marcin Owsiany: > A DoS does not necessarily mean a lot of traffic byte-wise. Remember > that it only takes 2 packets sent and one received to initiate a TCP > connection. And creating a huge number of connections certainly can be > considered a DoS. Yo

(no subject)

2004-08-31 Thread Rockinbob13
up date info.

Re: Spyware / Adware

2004-08-31 Thread Daniel Pittman
On 1 Sep 2004, Jim Richardson wrote: > On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 16:50:09 +0200, > Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Tuesday 31 August 2004 13.30, Volker Tanger wrote: >> >> [spyware/adware/trojans/...:] >> >>> Yes and no. When surfing as normal user *ware programs can

Re: Spyware / Adware

2004-08-31 Thread s. keeling
Incoming from Daniel Pittman: > > *Most* mail clients under Unix are better written than to do that, but Even mutt (a terrific MUA) _can be told_ to automatically "handle" MIME types for you, if you want. It just depends what's in your ~/.mailcap, and that can contain any sort of command you can

Re: Spyware / Adware

2004-08-31 Thread Daniel Pittman
On 1 Sep 2004, s. keeling wrote: > Incoming from Daniel Pittman: >> >> *Most* mail clients under Unix are better written than to do that, but > > Even mutt (a terrific MUA) _can be told_ to automatically "handle" > MIME types for you, if you want. It just depends what's in your > /.mailcap, and th