Incoming from Rick Moen:
> Quoting Milan Jurik ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > The question isn't if stop using telnet. The question is why Debian's
> > telnetd is still vunerable.
>
> I'd apologise for the off-topic digression -- if I thought I'd given
> offence. ;->
No-one should have to apologise
On Sun, Sep 26, 2004 at 11:45:23AM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
That's unfortunate. Do you know of any workarounds?
Haven't looked into it lately.
We're seriously considering using RSA secureid with ssh (and quite
possibly other things via pam...). Has RSA acknowledged this or said
anything abou
Quoting Milan Jurik ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> The question isn't if stop using telnet. The question is why Debian's
> telnetd is still vunerable.
I'd apologise for the off-topic digression -- if I thought I'd given
offence. ;->
--
Cheers,"A raccoon tangled with a 23,000 volt line, today.
* Michael Stone ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> This is something that should be handled at the pam level and shouldn't
> require special handling from ssh. (Assuming a good ssh pam
> implementation.) The last time I looked at the securid pam module from
> rsa it didn't work with our ssh, but that's b
* Jose Luis Domingo Lopez ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Saturday, 25 September 2004, at 10:34:43 -0500,
> hanasaki wrote:
> > When IPSEC is being used, telnet works the same; however is secure
> > because it, like all traffic, is sent over a transparent tunnel.
> >
> But an IPsec tunnel encrypt
Hi Russell,
El dom, 26-09-2004 a las 14:02, Russell Coker escribió:
> On Sun, 26 Sep 2004 07:22, Lorenzo Hernandez Garcia-Hierro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > - openssh (i'm working on the patches that bring SecurID Token use
> > features, and others from independent hackers)
>
> Most of the
On Sun, Sep 26, 2004 at 10:02:03PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
On Sun, 26 Sep 2004 07:22, Lorenzo Hernandez Garcia-Hierro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
- openssh (i'm working on the patches that bring SecurID Token use
features, and others from independent hackers)
Most of the features you list are t
On Sat, Sep 25, 2004 at 12:13:26PM +0200, Jan Minar wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 04:15:09PM -0600, s. keeling wrote:
> > Is anyone still using telnet when there's ssh? Why? I wouldn't even
> > use it inside my own firewalled LAN. ssh is just better.
>
> I've been told telnet *does* make a
On Sun, 26 Sep 2004 07:22, Lorenzo Hernandez Garcia-Hierro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> - openssh (i'm working on the patches that bring SecurID Token use
> features, and others from independent hackers)
Most of the features you list are things that are difficult to get into
Debian/main. But to
On Saturday, 25 September 2004, at 10:34:43 -0500,
hanasaki wrote:
> When IPSEC is being used, telnet works the same; however is secure
> because it, like all traffic, is sent over a transparent tunnel.
>
But an IPsec tunnel encrypts traffic just between the tunnel endpoints.
But this need not t
On Friday, 24 September 2004, at 16:15:09 -0600,
s. keeling wrote:
> Is anyone still using telnet when there's ssh? Why? I wouldn't even
> use it inside my own firewalled LAN. ssh is just better.
>
Yes, many people have a curious sense of "computer security". They ask
for mega-cool (and MEGA e
11 matches
Mail list logo
