On Friday 26 November 2004 03.34, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >
> > And, of course, postgrey as the very first line of defense.
> >
> > Coupled with the usual checking on HELO (blocking 'localhost' HELOs and
> > my own IP does wonders
On Fr, 26.11.2004, 03:34, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>>
>> And, of course, postgrey as the very first line of defense.
>>
>> Coupled with the usual checking on HELO (blocking 'localhost' HELOs and
>> my
>> own IP does wonders!), SMTP p
* Christian Storch:
>> Things which increase the load on the remote mail servers are *bad*.
>> That would include responding with temporary errors unnecessairly and
>> adding unnecessary delays in communication. pipelining by itself isn't
>> necessairly terrible- adding things like 2 minute delay
On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 10:04:38AM +0100, Christian Storch wrote:
> What about greylisting depending on results of e.g. SA?
> Only above a limit of scores from SA greylisting would be become active.
Use as many RBLs instead of the SA score, but use them not for blocking but
for activating greylist
On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 10:57:31AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
>* Christian Storch:
>
>>> Things which increase the load on the remote mail servers are *bad*.
>>> That would include responding with temporary errors unnecessairly and
>>> adding unnecessary delays in communication. pipelining by it
George Georgalis schrieb/wrote/a écrit/escribió:
> On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 10:57:31AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> >* Christian Storch:
> >> What about greylisting depending on results of e.g. SA?
> >> Only above a limit of scores from SA greylisting would be become active.
> >This is very impoli
Hello,
Current CAN-2004-1010 was fixed on zip 2.30-8 but current sarge
version still vulnerable. This package need to be included on sarge to
solve it.
Thanks in advance,
Otavio
--
O T A V I OS A L V A D O R
-
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Friday 26 November 2004 03.34, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > * Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > >
> > > And, of course, postgrey as the very first line of defense.
> > >
> > > Coupled with the usu
On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 05:21:03PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Current CAN-2004-1010 was fixed on zip 2.30-8 but current sarge
> version still vulnerable. This package need to be included on sarge to
> solve it.
zip 2.30-8 is already in sarge:
zip | 2.30-8 | testing | source,
On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 05:21:03PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Current CAN-2004-1010 was fixed on zip 2.30-8 but current sarge
> version still vulnerable. This package need to be included on sarge to
> solve it.
It already has been.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
De
This one time, at band camp, Stephen Frost said:
> * Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > On Friday 26 November 2004 03.34, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > > * Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > >
> > > > And, of course, postgrey as the ve
Below are the errors reported by apt-get update. Is this correct?
Could someone explain please?
Thanks.
=== 16:35 CST 2004-11-26
Failed to fetch
http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/dists/sarge/main/binary-i386/Packages.gz
MD5Sum mismatch
Failed to fetch
http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/dists/sarg
Hi!
After the last security update with libkpathsea3 and tetex-bin my
LaTeX installation doesn't work any more. When I try to compile a
LaTeX file I get:
I can't find the format file `latex.fmt'!
What can I do to get a working LaTeX installation back? I urgently
need it!
Thanks a lot in advance
Andreas Goesele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> After the last security update with libkpathsea3 and tetex-bin my
> LaTeX installation doesn't work any more. When I try to compile a
> LaTeX file I get:
>
> I can't find the format file `latex.fmt'!
>
> What can I do to get a working LaTeX installatio
On Sat, 27 Nov 2004, Andreas Goesele wrote:
> Andreas Goesele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > After the last security update with libkpathsea3 and tetex-bin my
> > LaTeX installation doesn't work any more. When I try to compile a
> > LaTeX file I get:
> >
> > I can't find the format file `latex.fmt
Incoming from Andreas Goesele:
> Andreas Goesele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > After the last security update with libkpathsea3 and tetex-bin my
> > LaTeX installation doesn't work any more. When I try to compile a
> > LaTeX file I get:
> >
> > I can't find the format file `latex.fmt'!
> >
> >
## Andreas Goesele ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > After the last security update with libkpathsea3 and tetex-bin my
> > LaTeX installation doesn't work any more. When I try to compile a
> > LaTeX file I get:
> > I can't find the format file `latex.fmt'!
> > What can I do to get a working LaTeX installat
* Stephen Gran ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> This one time, at band camp, Stephen Frost said:
> > That's a *terrible* and just plain stupid assumption. Queue size makes
> > a difference to me, both on a machine I run for some friends and in the
> > part-time work that I do for a small ISP (which, h
"s. keeling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Incoming from Andreas Goesele:
>> I found the solution. There is a bug in the new package:
>>
>> /usr/share/texmf/web2c does not link to /var/lib/texmf/web2c (as it
>
> Odd. It worked for me (though I haven't tried any LaTeX commands):
>
> (0) keeling /
This one time, at band camp, Stephen Frost said:
> * Stephen Gran ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > A sensible greylisting scheme will auto-whitelist a sending IP after
> > so many whitelisted entries (successful retries) - the only point of
> > greylisting is that we know that the remote end won't re
20 matches
Mail list logo
