On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 07:12:21PM -0800, peace bwitchu wrote:
> This has been bothering me as well. They dropped
> support for kernel 2.4.18 when Herbert Xu left but I
> don't remember seeing any notification of this. I
> roll my own but how many boxes out there havn't been
> patched because the
On Sat, 29 Jan 2005, michael wrote:
On debian-user it was suggested I also post this here, thanks, Michael
I notice that frequently many machines around here get attacked by a
potential hacker (a prog I guess) trying lots of usernames to get in to
all the machines, using the same set of usernames
This has been bothering me as well. They dropped
support for kernel 2.4.18 when Herbert Xu left but I
don't remember seeing any notification of this. I
roll my own but how many boxes out there havn't been
patched because they didn't know?
--- Norbert Tretkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> *
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>> There are Security Updates for kernel 2.4.18
>
> The last update for kernel-source-2.4.18 in stable was in April 2004.
BTW: I wonder why http://packages.qa.debian.org/k/kernel-source-2.4.18.html
contains the latest version 2.4.18-14.3 but no entry in t
* Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Am 2005-01-29 14:45:37, schrieb Harald Krammer:
> > You are right, but why is the kernel image from woody not up-to
> > date ?
>
> There are Security Updates for kernel 2.4.18
The last update for kernel-source-2.4.18 in stable was in April 2004.
Norbert
--
To UNSUB
* Michal J. Gajda:
> When can I hope new Debian Archive for 2005 to appear?
> Who can fix the problem?
I've suggested to the ftp-masters to add a new self-signature to the
2004 key as a temporary measure. This should fix the Release file
signing.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 03:05:35PM +, michael wrote:
> On debian-user it was suggested I also post this here, thanks, Michael
> Forwarded Message
> From: michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: debian user
> Subject: security
> Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 09:46:31 +
> I notice that
A possible improvement:
http://www.soloport.com/iptables.html
Quoting Steve Suehring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Could it be this?
>
> http://lists.sans.org/pipermail/intrusions/2004-August/008357.html
>
> You didn't specify which usernames were being used, so it's tough to
> tell if that's the
Am 2005-01-29 14:45:37, schrieb Harald Krammer:
> Hi !
> You are right, but why is the kernel image from woody not up-to date ?
There are Security Updates for kernel 2.4.18
> A simple 'apt-get update && apt-get upgrade' will not help. Is is not
> better to remove the kernel image from woody and
On Sat, 2005-01-29 at 09:44 -0600, Steve Suehring wrote:
> Could it be this?
>
> http://lists.sans.org/pipermail/intrusions/2004-August/008357.html
>
> You didn't specify which usernames were being used, so it's tough to
> tell if that's the same.
There seems to be two sets, one is half a dozen
>
> I'm sure others have appropriate suggestions as well.
>
I've had similar problems myself so I threw together a little perl
just to check what usernames are being used so I can make a note of
never allowing any of them to be a valid one.
It's not very pretty, but you're welcome to it:
http:/
Hello
I'm probably not the only one to notice, that Release.gpg files for unstable and
testing are empty, and that Debian Archive key for 2005 seems not to appear in
/usr/share/apt/debian-archive.gpg.
When can I hope new Debian Archive for 2005 to appear?
Who can fix the problem?
Is there a workaro
Could it be this?
http://lists.sans.org/pipermail/intrusions/2004-August/008357.html
You didn't specify which usernames were being used, so it's tough to
tell if that's the same.
A couple of simple and quick things that I might do if this was a
concern:
-Setup an iptables firewall on the boxe
Greetings,...
Am Samstag, 29. Januar 2005 16:05 schrieb michael:
> On debian-user it was suggested I also post this here, thanks, Michael
> Forwarded Message
> From: michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: debian user
> Subject: security
> Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 09:46:31 +
> I not
Greetings,
Am Freitag, 28. Januar 2005 21:25 schrieb Harald Krammer:
> hi !
>
> I have running some debian/woody machines with kernel 2.4.18.
>
> @:~$ cat /proc/version
> Linux version 2.4.18-1-k7 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 2.95.4 20011002
> (Debian prerelease)) #1 Wed Apr 14 19:20:42 UTC 20
On debian-user it was suggested I also post this here, thanks, Michael
Forwarded Message
From: michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: debian user
Subject: security
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 09:46:31 +
I notice that frequently many machines around here get attacked by a
potential hacker
+++ Nick Boyce [29/01/05 02:56 +]:
> I think it
> should be okay to simply change the permissions on
> /var/run/samba/locking.tdb so only root can access it. There's no
> real need for ordinary users to use smbstatus anyway. IMHO.
Have you actually *tried* that 'solution'? Perhaps smbstatus
Hi !
You are right, but why is the kernel image from woody not up-to date ?
A simple 'apt-get update && apt-get upgrade' will not help. Is is not
better to remove the kernel image from woody and take the kernel image
2.4.27 ( I know , it is a version update). A lot of people use only the
kerne
18 matches
Mail list logo