Sam Morris wrote:
Michael Stone wrote:
IMO, if people really intend for the package to have no security support
in the long term then it should exist only in volatile. I think it is
dangerously irresponsible to ship software we do not intend to support.
But back to Debian. The system we have
Michael Stone wrote:
IMO, if people really intend for the package to have no security support
in the long term then it should exist only in volatile. I think it is
dangerously irresponsible to ship software we do not intend to support.
Would we have to move Sarge's kernel packages to 'volatile'
I compiled the following list this morning:
CAN-2004-0718
CAN-2005-1937 = MFSA-2005-51
CAN-2005-2114
CAN-2005-2260 = MFSA-2005-45
CAN-2005-2261 = MFSA-2005-46
CAN-2005-2262 = MFSA-2005-47
CAN-2005-2263 = MFSA-2005-48
CAN-2005-2264 = MFSA-2005-49
CAN-2005-2265 = MFSA-2005-50
CAN-2005-2266 = MFSA-2
Hi!
I have this entry in my smbd.log file:
[2005/07/28 15:38:03, 2] smbd/open.c:open_file(245)
nobody opened file /elite/rewrites_01 read=Yes write=No (numopen=3)
But how can I configure samba to log the remote's host or ip, or anything from
what I could trail who is copying from me?
Thanks
On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 04:55:26AM +0100, Sam Morris wrote:
I think it's up to the package's maintainer to propose that it go into
Volatile (if indeed Volatile is a suitable place for it--backports.org
seems like a better fit, once it starts hosting packages for Sarge).
IMO, if people really i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 27 Jul 2005, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Holger Mense:
>
[mozilla and firefox security issues]
> > But as far as I can overlook the situation, they are still unfixed in
> > Sarge. Are there going to be fixed uploads in the foreseeable future?
>
6 matches
Mail list logo
