Mailman DoS CVE-2005-3573, debbug #339095

tags 339095 -unreproducible tags 339095 +security patch thanks Hi, I've noticed that an issue I have fixed in Mailman in sid has been issued a CVE and that Mandrake has issued a security advisory over it. I haven't been able to reproduce the DoS part of the report, so I didn't treat it as a

Byteventure Impulse 12/2005

Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren, lassen Sie sich von unseren Impulsen im Frühjahr 2006 verführen. IT-Schulungen in Kapstadt/Südafrika - Byteventure organisiert Trainings für IT-Fachleute an weltweit attraktiven Urlaubsorten. Wir haben uns erlaubt,

Re: Mailman DoS CVE-2005-3573, debbug #339095

On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 12:25:50PM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: I've noticed that an issue I have fixed in Mailman in sid has been issued a CVE and that Mandrake has issued a security advisory over it. The Mandrake security advisory also covers another DoS that's - again - already fixed

Re: Mailman DoS CVE-2005-3573, debbug #339095

On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 03:29:48PM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 12:25:50PM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: I've noticed that an issue I have fixed in Mailman in sid has been issued a CVE and that Mandrake has issued a security advisory over it. The Mandrake

Weihnachts-Angebot: Loesungen fuers Leben

Weihnachts-Angebot: Loesungen fuers Leben Hallo, Sie haben diese Email erhalten, weil jemand, der Sie kennt, Sie als Person mit aussergewoehnlichen Faehigkeiten empfohlen hat. Und, ja, es duerfte wohl die wichtigste Email sein, die Sie seit langem erhalten haben. Denn wir von CO-ART laden

Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 922-1] New Linux 2.6.8 packages fix several vulnerabilities

On 12/15/05, Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Package: kernel-source-2.4.27 Perhaps this should be kernel-source-2.6.8? -- GPG Key ID: 0xD6655C18 Linux Just Simply Rocks! http://deathwing.penarmac.com/

Port 699 listening

My apologies in advance if this is the wrong place to ask this, this is my first time asking for help.. What is running on port 699? I only have squid, ssh, and dhcpd listening on my 2 internal interfaces, but nothing on my external one (XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX below) I just ran nmap, and it returned:

Re: Port 699 listening

See interspersed comments below. Quoting Alex Pankratz [EMAIL PROTECTED]: My apologies in advance if this is the wrong place to ask this, this is my first time asking for help.. What is running on port 699? I only have squid, ssh, and dhcpd listening on my 2 internal interfaces, but nothing

Re: Port 699 listening

See interspersed comments below. My replies interspersed Quoting Alex Pankratz [EMAIL PROTECTED]: My apologies in advance if this is the wrong place to ask this, this is my first time asking for help.. What is running on port 699? I only have squid, ssh, and dhcpd listening on my 2

Re: Port 699 listening

Quoting Alex Pankratz [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [snip] Did, and that made both 111 and 699 not show up in nmap scan. sweet, thanks Jeffery. I could swear that in the past I saw 111 open and I sort of ignored it, why would 699 be open now, and then closed? why is statd running, i dont use NFS. There

Re: Port 699 listening

In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: netstat -na | grep 699 tcp0 0 0.0.0.0:699 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN if you run it as root and use netstat -lnpo it will give you the pid and process name of the open listening socket. In some rare cases netstat wont help,