On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 09:03:12AM +1000, Andrew Vaughan wrote:
> > Package: qt4-x11
>
> > For the stable distribution (etch), this problem has been fixed in
> > version 4.2.1-2etch1
> >
> Etch shipped with 4.2.1-2+b1 packages.
>
> $ dpkg --compare-versions "4.2.1-2+b1" ">>" "4.2.1-2etc
Noah Meyerhans wrote:
>
> Debian Security Advisory DSA-1291-1[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.debian.org/security/ Noah Meyerhans
> May 15, 2007
> -
On Wednesday 16 May 2007 08:22, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
>
> Package: qt4-x11
> For the stable distribution (etch), this problem has been fixed in
> version 4.2.1-2etch1
>
Etch shipped with 4.2.1-2+b1 packages.
$ dpkg --compare-versions "4.2.1-2+b1" ">>" "4.2.1-2etch1" && echo yes
yes
Per
[not subscribed to -security, so please keep me on the CC]
On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 07:34:53PM +0200, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
>
> For the stable distribution (etch), these problems have been fixed in
> version 3.0.24-6etch1
>
> For the testing and unstable distributions (lenny and sid,
> respective
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Philip Hands wrote:
> Tomas Nykung wrote:
>> On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 10:04:46AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
>>> FYI:
>>>
>>> < weinholt> one of the security.debian.org mirrors is out of date.
>>> 128.101.240.212 has a /debian-security/dists/etch/upda
martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Giacomo A. Catenazzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.05.15.1646 +0200]:
the theory: zone transfer of a DNS gives internal information about
structure and IPs of internal machines.
my theory: that information should be public, or at least if it
were, the network sh
also sprach Giacomo A. Catenazzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.05.15.1646 +0200]:
> the theory: zone transfer of a DNS gives internal information about
> structure and IPs of internal machines.
my theory: that information should be public, or at least if it
were, the network should not be unsafer bec
martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Abel Martín <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.05.15.1356 +0200]:
I thought zone transfers should only be possible between DNSs
which have records for the same domain, so why are debian.org DNSs
(raff, rietz, klecker) allowing zone transfers? Maybe I'm
paranoid, but I t
also sprach Abel Martín <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.05.15.1356 +0200]:
> I thought zone transfers should only be possible between DNSs
> which have records for the same domain, so why are debian.org DNSs
> (raff, rietz, klecker) allowing zone transfers? Maybe I'm
> paranoid, but I think there are sec
Hi,
I thought zone transfers should only be possible between DNSs which
have records for the same domain, so why are debian.org DNSs (raff,
rietz, klecker) allowing zone transfers? Maybe I'm paranoid, but I
think there are security issues related to this, including the
possibility of suffering Do
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 11:19:32PM +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
>
> no. Bad karma.
I like this explanation the most :)
This would explain a lot...
Funny thing is that today when i run "host security.debian.org" i get
alternating results exactly as it should be, so today it looks like
rerunni
11 matches
Mail list logo
