On Fri, 25 Jan 2008, Török Edwin wrote:
> If it is 2.6, I suggest you to contact the netfilter mailing list [1],
> and show them your firewall rules,
What makes you think they don't know about this? It is a design detail of
the way netfilter is implemented, and the two methods of acceleration I
m
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Jan 2008, Rolf Kutz wrote:
>
>> On 23/01/08 08:29 -0700, Michael Loftis wrote:
>>
>>> It's better to leave the service disabled, or even better, completely
>>> uninstalled from a security standpoint, and from a DoS standpoint as
>>> well. T
On Wed, 23 Jan 2008, Rolf Kutz wrote:
> On 23/01/08 08:29 -0700, Michael Loftis wrote:
>> It's better to leave the service disabled, or even better, completely
>> uninstalled from a security standpoint, and from a DoS standpoint as
>> well. The Linux kernel isn't very efficient at processing fir
Hi
Little something on the side, while its in my mind.
If there was anything i would like to see, that is more of the netfilters patch
o matic's available in the kernel.
Hence, less need to wget patch o matic and to follow the process. Its not a big
task, but still, total time waster.
Anyway
4 matches
Mail list logo