Rolf Kutz un jour écrivit:
On 23/04/08 07:00 -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
disk"--systems maintainence issue.) The end result of data security
processes should lead you to backups or some other contingency plan,
no shoving arbitrary software into stable because it scratches your
itch. Instead
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 01:13:46PM -0400, Hubert Chathi wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 18:01:12 +1000 Alex Samad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > This is an error I was getting on xscreensaver that i noticed was
> > being caused by pam.
>
> This is probably bugs #295526, #309037, #362954, #440955,
Mark H. Weaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Although this advisory says that a stable update is available for
> sparc, the sparc binary packages are missing from the advisory, and
> they do not seem to be on security.debian.org either.
>
> Are you aware of this issue? Is it being worked on?
The s
I have started 2 weeks holidays. If you have any technical support
requests, please create a ticket with your online ticket system. Thanks!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 18:01:12 +1000 Alex Samad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is an error I was getting on xscreensaver that i noticed was
> being caused by pam.
This is probably bugs #295526, #309037, #362954, #440955, (have I
missed any?).
From #295526, it looks like the pam_unix2 maintainer
On 23/04/08 07:00 -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
needs to be scoped. There is no benefit whatsoever to defining
*anything bad that happens* as a computer security issue. ("Oops, I
acidentally deleted my own file"--no, you screwed up, "Oops, the
building burned down"--bigger problem than compute
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 09:14:28AM +0200, Vladislav Kurz wrote:
This bight be a little off-topic, but I'd like to know if there is a
definition of what is a "security issue" ? Once I learned that security
consists of confidentiality, integrity and availability. And data corruption
destroys inte
Hi
This is an error I was getting on xscreensaver that i noticed was being
caused by pam.
I tied the debian-user list, but thought it more appropriate in deb-sec
basically I have this in my common-auth
auth [success=1 default=ignore] pam_unix2.so
auth required pam_ldap.so use_first_pass
auth re
On Wednesday 23 of April 2008, dann frazier wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 04:45:53PM -0600, Michael Loftis wrote:
> > --On April 22, 2008 11:21:25 PM +0200 Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > wrote:
> >> I guess the number of systems with amd64 and a 3ware 7xxx/8 PATA
> >> controllers
* dann frazier:
> But that doesn't make them security issues. Don't get me wrong, I'd be
> all for a more fluid update process for non-security/critical issues,
> but it doesn't exist at the moment. The security team controls what
> goes out as a security update, and we're not going to get the sec
10 matches
Mail list logo
