I Knew I Loved You http://125.225.21.89/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi everyone,
If I am sending this to the wrong list please let me know!
I have a server, details below, that I've updated to address the ssl
random number generator issue but after generating the new ssh_host rsa
and ssh_host_dsa keys, ssh still complains they're still vulnerable. I
would
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 1:29 AM, James Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
libssl0.9.8:
Installed: 0.9.8e-4
Candidate: 0.9.8e-4
Version table:
*** 0.9.8e-4 0
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
0.9.8c-4etch3 0
500 http://security.debian.org etch/updates/main Packages
0.9.8c-4etch1 0
Hi,
(sorry James for sending it twice to you, forgot to press group reply)
On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 01:29:30PM -0500, James Miller wrote:
[...]
Reinstallation of libssl0.9.8 is not possible, it cannot be downloaded.
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
[...]
apt-cache
A n d i k a Triwidada wrote:
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 1:29 AM, James Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
libssl0.9.8:
Installed: 0.9.8e-4
Candidate: 0.9.8e-4
Version table:
*** 0.9.8e-4 0
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
0.9.8c-4etch3 0
500 http://security.debian.org etch/updates/main
On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 02:37:38PM -0500, James Miller wrote:
All I needed to do was run aptitude install libssl0.9.8=0.9.8c-4etch3
...
I have to admit, I _really_ need to learn aptitude, I'm kinda stuck in my
ways using apt-get and dselect.
I believe, that apt-get install package=version
W. Martin Borgert skrev:
On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 02:37:38PM -0500, James Miller wrote:
All I needed to do was run aptitude install libssl0.9.8=0.9.8c-4etch3
...
I have to admit, I _really_ need to learn aptitude, I'm kinda stuck in my ways
using apt-get and dselect.
I
yosh wrote:
W. Martin Borgert skrev:
On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 02:37:38PM -0500, James Miller wrote:
All I needed to do was run aptitude install
libssl0.9.8=0.9.8c-4etch3
...
I have to admit, I _really_ need to learn aptitude, I'm kinda stuck
in my ways using apt-get and dselect.
On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 10:24:53PM +0200, yosh wrote:
Sorry for hijacking the thread :)
If I choose install a package from stable and there is a newer copy in
testing (which I'm using) apt-get will try to replace that package on
the next apt-get upgrade. Is there any way to counteract
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 05, 2008 at 12:40:19AM +0300, Riku Valli wrote:
If I choose install a package from stable and there is a newer copy in
testing (which I'm using) apt-get will try to replace that package on
the next apt-get upgrade. Is there any way to counteract this?
regards
--
yosh
Harrison Conlin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 10:58 AM, Dan Christensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had this problem with a completely up-to-date Ubuntu gutsy install on
I can't reproduce this now, as I have since upgraded the machine to
hardy, which doesn't show the problem.
I use both debian and ubuntu, but the ubuntu lists are quite good as
well, so ubuntu users should stick to that for ubuntu question IMHO.
P.S. thanks to all the people who found the vulnerability and made the
fix. It was much more painless than i thought.
D.
On Jun 5, 2008, at 01:51, s.
s. keeling [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I don't use *buntu myself, but I've no problem with *buntu users
seeking Debian answers here.
Just to clarify: the original poster was a *Debian* user. I simply
was reporting that the same thing happened on Ubuntu, so this was not
restricted to a single
13 matches
Mail list logo