Re: Linux infected ?

2009-01-29 Thread Celejar
On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 11:52:59 -0800 Rick Moen wrote: ... > Matt Moen (no relation, but a friend) has done ground-breaking > research/comedy -- yes, it really was both at the same time -- on this > subject: http://www.linux.com/articles/42031 ROtFL! His writeup is utterly hilarious. Celejar --

Re: dhcp delivered subnet broadcast address: 255.255.255.255

2009-01-29 Thread Miroslaw Kwasniak
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 12:26:46PM -0800, Matt Kincaid wrote: > Hello, I'm having the same issue. > > > > I can broadcast to the ###.###.###.255 fine but my switches/routers > throw out 255.255.255.255. Routers must have dhcp-relay function. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-security-requ

Re: Linux infected ?

2009-01-29 Thread Ralph Jenkin
Am I the only one thinking; "Wine can actually manage to get infected by malware now? Cool." Props to those guys for their hard work implementing the Win32 API so completely. Last time I tried testing that (in a quarantined sandbox) it was an insta-crash. That was a few years ago, admittedly. M

Re: dhcp delivered subnet broadcast address: 255.255.255.255

2009-01-29 Thread Matt Kincaid
Hello, I'm having the same issue. I can broadcast to the ###.###.###.255 fine but my switches/routers throw out 255.255.255.255. Have you found any solution? Matt Kincaid --- DISCLAIMER: Information contained in this m

Re: Linux infected ?

2009-01-29 Thread Miroslaw Kwasniak
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 09:31:33AM -0700, Scott Edwards wrote: > > Try scanning your .wine directory like this: > $ clamscan -ri ~/.wine An interesting idea (a recipe for Debian): http://www.burghardt.pl/2007/11/wine-with-on-access-clamav-scanning/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-security-

Re: Linux infected ?

2009-01-29 Thread Fabricio Cannini - Yahoo
On Thursday 29 January 2009 14:31:33 Scott Edwards wrote: > It still has the same permissions as any other process by that user. There > are a few viruses that can infect elf binaries when running from a windows > host, so it's not all that isolated based on execution platform. Out of curiosity,

Re: Linux infected ?

2009-01-29 Thread Rick Moen
Quoting Sam Kuper (sam.ku...@uclmail.net): > 2009/1/29 Rodrigo Hashimoto > > In the first attempt the iceweasel didn't respond, then I tried again and I > > realized the iceweasel was trying to use the wine. > > I never let weasels drink alcohol ;-) > > Seriously, though, I hope you get to the

Re: Linux infected ?

2009-01-29 Thread Sam Kuper
2009/1/29 Rodrigo Hashimoto > In the first attempt the iceweasel didn't respond, then I tried again and I > realized the iceweasel was trying to use the wine. I never let weasels drink alcohol ;-) Seriously, though, I hope you get to the bottom of this. I've long wondered about cross-platform s

Re: Linux infected ?

2009-01-29 Thread Rodrigo Hashimoto
Hi Henri, In fact I received this file from a friend, and when I saw the attached file it sounds like a html file, that's why I tried to use the iceweasel. In the first attempt the iceweasel didn't respond, then I tried again and I realized the iceweasel was trying to use the wine. Then I realize

Re: Linux infected ?

2009-01-29 Thread Scott Edwards
It still has the same permissions as any other process by that user. There are a few viruses that can infect elf binaries when running from a windows host, so it's not all that isolated based on execution platform. On Jan 29, 2009 4:00 AM, "Török Edwin" wrote: Rodrigo Hashimoto wrote: > Hi, > >

Re: Linux infected ?

2009-01-29 Thread John Goerzen
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 09:04:46AM -0200, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote: > Rodrigo Hashimoto wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I received a file via e-mail and tried to open it, then the iceweasel > > did nothing. I tried again and I realized the iceweasel was trying to > > user the "wine" to open a file ".com".

Re: Linux infected ?

2009-01-29 Thread Henri Salo
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 09:04:46AM -0200, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote: > Rodrigo Hashimoto wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I received a file via e-mail and tried to open it, then the iceweasel > > did nothing. I tried again and I realized the iceweasel was trying to > > user the "wine" to open a file ".com".

Re: Linux infected ?

2009-01-29 Thread Eduardo M KALINOWSKI
Rodrigo Hashimoto wrote: > Hi, > > I received a file via e-mail and tried to open it, then the iceweasel > did nothing. I tried again and I realized the iceweasel was trying to > user the "wine" to open a file ".com". Then I run the command "file" > and I realized this is king of a virus to Windows

Re: Linux infected ?

2009-01-29 Thread Török Edwin
Rodrigo Hashimoto wrote: > Hi, > > I received a file via e-mail and tried to open it, then the iceweasel > did nothing. I tried again and I realized the iceweasel was trying to > user the "wine" to open a file ".com". Then I run the command "file" > and I realized this is king of a virus to Windows

Re: Linux infected ?

2009-01-29 Thread Henri Salo
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 08:38:06AM -0200, Rodrigo Hashimoto wrote: > Hi, > > I received a file via e-mail and tried to open it, then the iceweasel did > nothing. I tried again and I realized the iceweasel was trying to user the > "wine" to open a file ".com". Then I run the command "file" and I re

Linux infected ?

2009-01-29 Thread Rodrigo Hashimoto
Hi, I received a file via e-mail and tried to open it, then the iceweasel did nothing. I tried again and I realized the iceweasel was trying to user the "wine" to open a file ".com". Then I run the command "file" and I realized this is king of a virus to Windows and not Linux. This is a security

Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 1715-1] New moin packages fix insufficient input sanitising

2009-01-29 Thread Andy Smith
Thank you Devin, the problem was solved yesterday by other member helps. 2009. 01. 29, csütörtök keltezéssel 07.14-kor Devin Carraway ezt írta: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > - > Debian Security Advis