Bart Martens wrote:
Hello debian-release team,
debian-volatile team,
debian-security team,
I have updated bug report 457291 flashplugin-nonfree: decision
2007-12-21: keep this package out of stable starting with lenny.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=457291
I
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-security-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hi Luk,
On Wednesday 22 April 2009, Luk Claes wrote:
Bart Martens wrote:
I have updated bug report 457291 flashplugin-nonfree: decision
2007-12-21: keep this package out of stable starting with lenny.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=457291
I hereby invite you to
Hi !
Le Wednesday 22 April 2009 09:07:58 Jan Wagner, vous avez écrit :
I've requested a slot at DebConf to discuss this into detail, though
feel free to start a discussion already on debian-devel.
sorry for coming around with another issue. While reading your comment
without giving
Hi Romain,
On Wednesday 22 April 2009, Romain Beauxis wrote:
However, I wonder if this would need yet another archive, or just an update
of a policy, either in backports.org or volatile..
DUNNO for volatile, but the ftp-master of bpo, which is actually doing the
main work clarified, that
[Dropping -release and -volatile]
Jan Wagner wrote:
Hi Romain,
On Wednesday 22 April 2009, Romain Beauxis wrote:
However, I wonder if this would need yet another archive, or just an
update of a policy, either in backports.org or volatile..
DUNNO for volatile, but the ftp-master of bpo,
Le Wednesday 22 April 2009 12:35:12 Raphael Geissert, vous avez écrit :
[Dropping -release and -volatile]
Jan Wagner wrote:
Hi Romain,
On Wednesday 22 April 2009, Romain Beauxis wrote:
However, I wonder if this would need yet another archive, or just an
update of a policy, either in
[Don't CC me, thanks]
Romain Beauxis wrote:
Le Wednesday 22 April 2009 12:35:12 Raphael Geissert, vous avez écrit :
I think you have a wrong view, probably due to the fact that you don't
maintain or develop webapps (I might be wrong, please apologize in this
case).
I do not maintain any
Le Wednesday 22 April 2009 18:52:48 Raphael Geissert, vous avez écrit :
I gave this example precisely because mediawiki upstream release
management is one of the most serious I know in webapps. And even though
they fix issues with care, and their code is surely very good, then this
ends up
Hi Romain (and others)
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 09:23:24 am Romain Beauxis wrote:
Le Wednesday 22 April 2009 18:52:48 Raphael Geissert, vous avez écrit :
I gave this example precisely because mediawiki upstream release
management is one of the most serious I know in webapps. And even
though
10 matches
Mail list logo