On 2009-10-07, Paul Wise wrote:
> Just in case the stable release managers what to do something about it
> and don't know about this yet, clamav upstream are taking some
> interesting measures to "encourage" people to upgrade from the now
> EOLed 0.94.x series. The mail isn't fully clear, but it s
On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 09:08:31AM +, Jörg Sommer wrote:
> > You need to make sure that the machine actually gets rebooted when
> > security updates are made.
>
> I thought for security fixes in modules it's enough to update/replace
> the module. Isn't it?
No. If the module is already loaded
On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 02:11:39PM +0200, Tomasz Papszun wrote:
> On Thu, 08 Oct 2009 at 13:09:02 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 12:25:51PM +0200, Tomasz Papszun wrote:
> > > Sorry, it may seem a little harsh,
> > Why?
> Well, from the Paul's message I had an impression he
On Thu, 8 Oct 2009 12:25:51 +0200 Tomasz Papszun wrote:
>On Wed, 07 Oct 2009 at 14:47:21 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
>> Just in case the stable release managers what to do something about it
>> and don't know about this yet, clamav upstream are taking some
>> interesting measures to "encourage" people
On Thu, 08 Oct 2009 at 13:09:02 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 12:25:51PM +0200, Tomasz Papszun wrote:
> > Sorry, it may seem a little harsh,
>
> Why?
Well, from the Paul's message I had an impression he felt so :-).
> >but the reason is
Peter Palfrader schrieb:
On Mon, 05 Oct 2009, dann frazier wrote:
cat /proc/version is nice because it is the running kernel, and
includes the package version.
Also, maybe
http://git.debian.org/?p=mirror/dsa-nagios.git;a=blob;f=dsa-nagios-checks/checks/dsa-check-running-kernel;hb=HEAD
On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 12:25:51PM +0200, Tomasz Papszun wrote:
> Sorry, it may seem a little harsh,
Why?
>but the reason is that unless the
> majority of ClamAV users upgrade to >= 0.95.x, old freshclams will put
> an excessive load on ClamAV database mirror
On Wed, 07 Oct 2009 at 14:47:21 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> Just in case the stable release managers what to do something about it
> and don't know about this yet, clamav upstream are taking some
> interesting measures to "encourage" people to upgrade from the now
> EOLed 0.94.x series. The mail isn'
Hi,
Mark van Walraven wrote:
>> AFAIK, the best way to know if you're running a stale kernel is to
>> compare the uptime of the machine against the mtime of the actual kernel
>> (using, e.g. "stat /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.26-2-686"). If the uptime of the
>> machine places the last reboot sometime befor
Hello Noah,
Noah Meyerhans wrote:
> You need to make sure that the machine actually gets rebooted when
> security updates are made.
I thought for security fixes in modules it's enough to update/replace
the module. Isn't it?
Bye, Jörg.
--
NetBSD ist für Frauen: es läuft auf Waschmaschinen
--
10 matches
Mail list logo