Re: [SRM] clamav 0.94.x EOL

2009-10-08 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
On 2009-10-07, Paul Wise wrote: > Just in case the stable release managers what to do something about it > and don't know about this yet, clamav upstream are taking some > interesting measures to "encourage" people to upgrade from the now > EOLed 0.94.x series. The mail isn't fully clear, but it s

Re: rootkit not found by rkhunter

2009-10-08 Thread Noah Meyerhans
On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 09:08:31AM +, Jörg Sommer wrote: > > You need to make sure that the machine actually gets rebooted when > > security updates are made. > > I thought for security fixes in modules it's enough to update/replace > the module. Isn't it? No. If the module is already loaded

Re: [SRM] clamav 0.94.x EOL

2009-10-08 Thread Bastian Blank
On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 02:11:39PM +0200, Tomasz Papszun wrote: > On Thu, 08 Oct 2009 at 13:09:02 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 12:25:51PM +0200, Tomasz Papszun wrote: > > > Sorry, it may seem a little harsh, > > Why? > Well, from the Paul's message I had an impression he

Re: [Pkg-clamav-devel] [SRM] clamav 0.94.x EOL

2009-10-08 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Thu, 8 Oct 2009 12:25:51 +0200 Tomasz Papszun wrote: >On Wed, 07 Oct 2009 at 14:47:21 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: >> Just in case the stable release managers what to do something about it >> and don't know about this yet, clamav upstream are taking some >> interesting measures to "encourage" people

Re: [SRM] clamav 0.94.x EOL

2009-10-08 Thread Tomasz Papszun
On Thu, 08 Oct 2009 at 13:09:02 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 12:25:51PM +0200, Tomasz Papszun wrote: > > Sorry, it may seem a little harsh, > > Why? Well, from the Paul's message I had an impression he felt so :-). > >but the reason is

Re: running vs. installed kernel

2009-10-08 Thread Guntram Trebs
Peter Palfrader schrieb: On Mon, 05 Oct 2009, dann frazier wrote: cat /proc/version is nice because it is the running kernel, and includes the package version. Also, maybe http://git.debian.org/?p=mirror/dsa-nagios.git;a=blob;f=dsa-nagios-checks/checks/dsa-check-running-kernel;hb=HEAD

Re: [SRM] clamav 0.94.x EOL

2009-10-08 Thread Bastian Blank
On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 12:25:51PM +0200, Tomasz Papszun wrote: > Sorry, it may seem a little harsh, Why? >but the reason is that unless the > majority of ClamAV users upgrade to >= 0.95.x, old freshclams will put > an excessive load on ClamAV database mirror

Re: [SRM] clamav 0.94.x EOL

2009-10-08 Thread Tomasz Papszun
On Wed, 07 Oct 2009 at 14:47:21 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > Just in case the stable release managers what to do something about it > and don't know about this yet, clamav upstream are taking some > interesting measures to "encourage" people to upgrade from the now > EOLed 0.94.x series. The mail isn'

Re: rootkit not found by rkhunter

2009-10-08 Thread Jörg Sommer
Hi, Mark van Walraven wrote: >> AFAIK, the best way to know if you're running a stale kernel is to >> compare the uptime of the machine against the mtime of the actual kernel >> (using, e.g. "stat /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.26-2-686"). If the uptime of the >> machine places the last reboot sometime befor

Re: rootkit not found by rkhunter

2009-10-08 Thread Jörg Sommer
Hello Noah, Noah Meyerhans wrote: > You need to make sure that the machine actually gets rebooted when > security updates are made. I thought for security fixes in modules it's enough to update/replace the module. Isn't it? Bye, Jörg. -- NetBSD ist für Frauen: es läuft auf Waschmaschinen --