Bonjour,
Ceci est une confirmation que vous vous êtes désabonné de notre base.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-security-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/31086d433c06273ea9bea4a96281a...@smt
Cette newsletter vous a été envoyée au format graphique HTML.
Si vous lisez cette version, alors votre logiciel de messagerie préfère les
e-mails au format texte.
Vous pouvez lire la version originale en ligne:
http:/
On Monday, October 11, 2010 17:18:34 you wrote:
>On 10/11/2010 12:21 PM, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
>>> Anyone else perceive this situation as being a bit sub-optimal from
>>> the security perspective?
>>
>> No.
>
>Interesting. Do you happen to run any such systems in a production
>environment?
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 17:18:34 -0500 Marsh Ray wrote:
> > You would need to convince the kernel team that the bigmem kernel
> > should be the default on i386 systems.
>
> "Please?"
Don't ask this list, ask the kernel team (via bug report and/or
mailing list message). Note that ubuntu uses some kin
On 10/11/2010 12:21 PM, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
Anyone else perceive this situation as being a bit sub-optimal from
the security perspective?
No.
Interesting. Do you happen to run any such systems in a production
environment?
Debian server admins are running amd64, not i386, and NX
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 11:50:54 -0500, Marsh Ray wrote:
> On 10/10/2010 12:40 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 01:35:10PM -0400, Brchk05 wrote:
> >> this means that my CPU supports nx but I do
> >> not have the right type of kernel, i.e., one that uses PAE
> >> addressing, to suppo
In <4cb3406e.5020...@extendedsubset.com>, Marsh Ray wrote:
>On 10/10/2010 12:40 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
>> On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 01:35:10PM -0400, Brchk05 wrote:
>>> this means that my CPU supports nx but I do
>>> not have the right type of kernel, i.e., one that uses PAE
>>> addressing, to support
On 10/10/2010 12:40 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 01:35:10PM -0400, Brchk05 wrote:
this means that my CPU supports nx but I do
not have the right type of kernel, i.e., one that uses PAE
addressing, to support enforcement (or is that part Ubuntu
specific). Does this sound plausib
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 10:39:37 -0500, Jordon Bedwell wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 11:15 -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> > I highly doubt that there is anything malicious going on here, and there
> > is always the "Debian does not hide problems" mantra. The simplest,
> > and most-likely explanation
On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 11:15 -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> I highly doubt that there is anything malicious going on here, and there
> is always the "Debian does not hide problems" mantra. The simplest,
> and most-likely explanation is that it was easier to update to the new
> upstream, rather tha
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 09:46:04 -0500, Jordon Bedwell wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 10:40 -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> > The problem here appears to be the jump to the new upstream version
> > (1.8.2 to 1.8.13), which has a different dependency set. New
> > upstreams are usually disallowed in sec
On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 10:40 -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> The problem here appears to be the jump to the new upstream version
> (1.8.2 to 1.8.13), which has a different dependency set. New
> upstreams are usually disallowed in security uploads. The question
> is why was that OK in this case, ra
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 14:14:41 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Florian Weimer writes ("[SECURITY] [DSA-2115-2] New moodle packages fix
> several vulnerabilities"):
> > DSA-2115-1 introduced a regression because it lacked a dependency on
> > the wwwconfig-common package, leading to installations problems
Florian Weimer writes ("[SECURITY] [DSA-2115-2] New moodle packages fix several
vulnerabilities"):
> DSA-2115-1 introduced a regression because it lacked a dependency on
> the wwwconfig-common package, leading to installations problems. This
> update addresses this issue. For reference, the text
14 matches
Mail list logo