Re: bitcoind: 0.3.24~dfsg-1~bpo60+1 policy on backports?

On Sunday, July 22, 2012 10:27:21 PM Mike Mestnik wrote: > It seams as though packaging this may have been premature as the > software is still in development and Debian would continually have an > outdated version. Beginning with 0.4, I have been maintaining stable branches with only bugfixes. C

Re: bitcoind: 0.3.24~dfsg-1~bpo60+1 policy on backports?

I've not got more of the story, every release of bitcoin is BETA currently. >From doc/README: Bitcoin 0.3.24 BETA CC luke+bitc...@dashjr.org on discussions. It seams as though packaging this may have been premature as the software is still in development and Debian would continually have an outd

bitcoind: 0.3.24~dfsg-1~bpo60+1 policy on backports?

What's the policy(or usual outcome) on security issues in squeeze-backports/main? I'm told that 0.3.24 may be vulnerable to these at the vary least... CVE-2012-1909, BIP-0016, CVE-2012-2459, and CVE-2012-3789 https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Common_Vulnerabilities_and_Exposures It doesn't look like th