Marko Randjelovic:
> SELinux security benefits are vague because it makes possible to
> use it's hooks to add a backdoor which would be nearly impossible
> to detect:
>
> https://www.rsbac.org/documentation/why_rsbac_does_not_use_lsm
> https://grsecurity.net/lsm.php
SELinux, AppArmor, Smack and
On 01/19/2014 04:06 PM, Kevin Olbrich wrote:
I did not know about grsecurity. Thanks for the hint. After some quick browsing
it seemed it works like the windows code execution protection. I will try to
compile the kernel with this patch like you did.
Linux is the most secure OS IMHO - distribu
On Mon, 20 Jan 2014 11:45:08 +0800
Paul Wise wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 7:27 AM, Celejar wrote:
>
> > A lot of people in this discussion seem to have your tacit assumption,
> > that the NSA and its tactics are fundamentally at odds with morality.
> > JFTR, many of us do not agree.
>
> Cou
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 7:27 AM, Celejar wrote:
> A lot of people in this discussion seem to have your tacit assumption,
> that the NSA and its tactics are fundamentally at odds with morality.
> JFTR, many of us do not agree.
Could you explain the reason for your disagreement with this assumption
Hi,
I did not know about grsecurity. Thanks for the hint. After some quick browsing
it seemed it works like the windows code execution protection. I will try to
compile the kernel with this patch like you did.
Linux is the most secure OS IMHO - distributing this patch in debian would be
great
On 19 Jan 2014 12:16:25 +0100
"Andreas Kuckartz" wrote:
> Bjoern Meier:
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Security-Enhanced_Linux
>
> I proposed this Debian Release Goal:
> https://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/SELinux
>
> Cheers,
> Andreas
>
>
SELinux security benefits are vague because it ma
On Sat, 18 Jan 2014 15:04:48 -0500
Noah Meyerhans wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 08:30:49PM +0100, Marco Saller wrote:
> > i am not sure if this question has been asked or answered yet, please do
> > not mind if i would ask it again.
> > Is it possible that the NSA or other services included i
On Sun, 19 Jan 2014 22:58:54 +0100
"JKAbrams.se" wrote:
...
> And no, least there be speculation, I have no information to this
> effect, and from what I've learned of the open source community I
> don't think this is likely, for many of us it's a kind of moral
> calling that brought us here in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2014-01-18 21:04, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 08:30:49PM +0100, Marco Saller wrote:
>> i am not sure if this question has been asked or answered yet,
>> please do not mind if i would ask it again. Is it possible that
>> the NSA
Hi,
there is an open bug report:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=707006
http://osdir.com/ml/debian-live/2013-06/msg00029.html
You can post to:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-live/
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / best regards,
Kevin Olbrich.
Web: http://kevin-olbrich.de/
--
Diese E-M
Hi,
i want to verify the checksum files of current debian live cds. gpg says they
were signed with key id AD11CF6A. The instructions on http://keyring.debian.
org/ say this key is included in debian gpg keyring:
[...]
pub 4096R/AD11CF6A 2013-05-06
Key fingerprint = 1E4F 435C 4E9A 42B3 D9
Bjoern Meier:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Security-Enhanced_Linux
I proposed this Debian Release Goal:
https://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/SELinux
Cheers,
Andreas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-security-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas.
Even if there would not be a manipulated software package - hardware
manipulation in mainboards or network hardware (like cisco does) is already
known.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / best regards,
Kevin Olbrich.
(mobil vom iPhone)
--
Diese E-Mail enthält vertrauliche und/oder rechtlich geschützte I
13 matches
Mail list logo
