On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 12:15 AM, Chris Frey wrote:
> Can someone please point me to the upstream announcement for
> dropping gcc 4.7 support? I can't seem to find it, and I'd like
> to read up on the details why.
The answer is in the previous mail I sent. The short answer is C++11.
Best wishes,
On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 02:50:31PM +0100, Ml Ml wrote:
> Thank you very much! Your comments has been really helpful.
>
> Cheers,
> Mario
>
> On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 12:53 PM, Michael Zoet wrote:
> > Hi,
> >>
> >> Hello List,
> >>
> >> i have got about 50 Debian 6+7 Servers. They are doing all ki
Hi,
Can someone please point me to the upstream announcement for
dropping gcc 4.7 support? I can't seem to find it, and I'd like
to read up on the details why.
Thanks,
- Chris
On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 05:13:26PM -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
This should be fixed in the latest version. See https://bugs.debian.org/741678.
On 01.02.2015 03:09, John Goerzen wrote:
> Hello,
>
> A friend of mine pointed out to me recently that the Debian Live CD has
> ssh open to the network by default, and the "user" account -- which has
> passwordless su
Hello,
A friend of mine pointed out to me recently that the Debian Live CD has
ssh open to the network by default, and the "user" account -- which has
passwordless sudo to root privileges -- has a password that is
well-known and easily found via Google. This poses some nasty surprises
for people
On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 5:44 PM, Darius Jahandarie wrote:
>> Security support for the chromium web browser is now discontinued
>> for the stable distribution (wheezy). Chromium upstream stopped
>> supporting wheezy's build environment (gcc 4.7, make, etc.), so
>> there is no longer any practical w
On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 5:13 PM, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> - -
> Debian Security Advisory DSA-3148-1 secur...@debian.org
> http://www.debian.org/security/ Michael Gilbert
> January 31
Mario,
I use 'unattended-upgrades' on a couple hundred enduser desktop
workstations. The idea being that most potential exploits in our
environment might be through end-user browser/surfing.
I choose not to use it on a few hundred servers, most of which are internal
or perform specialized scien
Thank you very much! Your comments has been really helpful.
Cheers,
Mario
On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 12:53 PM, Michael Zoet wrote:
> Hi,
>>
>> Hello List,
>>
>> i have got about 50 Debian 6+7 Servers. They are doing all kind of
>> things like Webserver, Mailserver, DNS, etc…
>>
>> I am using apticr
Hi,
Hello List,
i have got about 50 Debian 6+7 Servers. They are doing all kind of
things like Webserver, Mailserver, DNS, etc…
I am using apticron to keep track of the updates, but i seem to use
more and more time updating the hosts.
I use apticron, cron-apt on various servers for several ye
We use cron-apt for over a year now to patch around 120 Debian Servers with
security fixes every night. In this time we never had a broken security update.
But we mostly use them as Webservers or Appservers who run Java-Apps. So if u
use highly specialized Software you need to consider for yours
On Sat, 2015-01-31 at 09:58 +0100, Ml Ml wrote:
> Do you think it is a good idea to do security updates automatically?
I've always avoided this for the same reasons as you, but thinking back
over the last 10 years, I don't think I've ever had an update break
something, so maybe it's time to try...
Hello List,
i have got about 50 Debian 6+7 Servers. They are doing all kind of
things like Webserver, Mailserver, DNS, etc…
I am using apticron to keep track of the updates, but i seem to use
more and more time updating the hosts.
Recently i came across the unattended-upgrade project
https://wik
13 matches
Mail list logo
