On 5/24/16, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 4:28 AM, Drake Wilson wrote:
>
>> Lacking any obvious way to talk to the security team without potentially
>> making my
>> message look more urgent than it was, I leave it to whoever else can
>> navigate the
>> Debian social structure to take
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 4:28 AM, Drake Wilson wrote:
> Lacking any obvious way to talk to the security team without potentially
> making my
> message look more urgent than it was, I leave it to whoever else can navigate
> the
> Debian social structure to take it up in the most appropriate manner
What is the legal problem here? I think the default license for the .spec file
is MIT:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main?rd=Licensing#License_of_Fedora_SPEC_Files
None now I'm aware of that policy - I just hadn't found it before.
On Mon, May 23, 2016, at 14:21, K & K Ruzicka-Eigenbauer wrote:
> UNSUBSCRIBE
Coming back to the horribly irritating and persistent flood of this---I filed
#821113 a
month ago about this, but the listmasters said I should ask the security team
instead,
since they set the policy for their own lis
UNSUBSCRIBE
Thank you!
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 5:38 AM wrote:
> Congratulations!___SHAQUANA___Claim___Y0ur__***VISA_GiftCard***
> Act_Now! Details_Apply.
Hello,
On 05/22/2016 12:25 AM, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote:
Control: merge -1 813809
I'd also like to see this (or an equivalent: I'm not aware of any, but
haven't looked much) in Debian, and am willing to try packaging it, but
am not sure whether it's a good idea for a non-DD,
non-security-special
7 matches
Mail list logo
