Re: securing server

2008-05-07 Thread Abdul Bijur Vallarkodath
> Le 07-05-2008, à 17:34:08 +0800, Abdul Bijur Vallarkodath ( > [EMAIL PROTECTED]) a écrit : > > >just my two pence. > > and my two centimes. > > >* Change the ports of most ports like ssh, ftp, smtp, imap etc. from > the > >default ones to some

Re: securing server

2008-05-07 Thread Abdul Bijur Vallarkodath
just my two pence. * Change the ports of most ports like ssh, ftp, smtp, imap etc. from the default ones to some other ones. It would be nice if you could mention what are you trying to shut out and against what are u trying to secure. Thanks, Abdul On 5/7/08, Jean-Paul Lacquement <[EMAIL PROT

Re: Default-Release 4.0*: security updates ignored

2007-05-02 Thread Abdul bijur Vallarkodath
Is there a solution to this? Someway to increase priority of the security updates? Thanks, Abdul On 5/2/07, Harald Staub <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello At our site, we define APT::Default-Release (in /etc/apt/apt.conf), so the consequences are limited when someone adds e.g. unstable to his

Re: Security Debian Questions

2007-04-23 Thread Abdul bijur Vallarkodath
Hi guys, Please do not mis interpret this, but I think you guys are posting on the wrong mailing list. Please take you doubts to #debian or some debian help mailing list. There are millions of people subscribed to the security mailing list hoping to hear about vulnerabilities if someone comes ac