Re: Upcoming changes to Debian Linux kernel packages

2023-10-03 Thread Andreas Beckmann
On 03/10/2023 19.30, Bastian Blank wrote: thread. Or freak out because meta packages remain uninstallable in backports for days. ... plus gcc or we change how backports works. If uninstallable packages in backports are a problem, perhaps backports needs something like britney to migrate

Re: Upcoming changes to Debian Linux kernel packages

2023-09-24 Thread Andreas Beckmann
On 25/09/2023 00.50, Bastian Blank wrote: Already built modules remain until someone deletes it. So you can also switch back to the still installed older kernel version and it will have the still working module available. This is what I expect not to work. Assume I have Linux 6.6 and a

Re: Upcoming changes to Debian Linux kernel packages

2023-09-24 Thread Andreas Beckmann
On 24/09/2023 15.01, Bastian Blank wrote: ## Kernel modules will be signed with an ephemeral key The modules will not longer be signed using the Secure Boot CA like the EFI kernel image itself. Instead a key will be created during the build and thrown away after. Do I correctly assume that

Re: Reintroducing openjdk-8 for Bullseye?

2020-04-09 Thread Andreas Beckmann
On 09/04/2020 22.12, Graham Inggs wrote: > I don't know about the AdoptOpenJDK builds, but Visual Profiler and > Nsight do work with openjdk-8 8u252-b07-1 from unstable. > > [1] > https://docs.nvidia.com/cuda/archive/10.1/cuda-toolkit-release-notes/index.html The version previously bundled by