forwarded 609641 todd.mil...@courtesan.com
thanks
On Tue, 11 Jan 2011 08:13:04 +0100, Alexander Kurtz kurtz.a...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Either this bug should be fixed[3] or
sudo should stop asking for a password completely. The current behavior
is inconsistent and violates the principle of
On Tue, 2006-03-28 at 05:27 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Again? I wrote a bug about this years ago with a fix. I think is was
just adding --rsh=/usr/bin/rsh to the configure call.
Your patch in response to 185594 added an RSH environment variable
definition to the configure invocation.
On Fri, 2006-03-24 at 22:07 +0100, Julien Danjou wrote:
Finally, I solved it this way:
diff -u tar-1.14/debian/rules tar-1.14/debian/rules
--- tar-1.14/debian/rules
+++ tar-1.14/debian/rules
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
build-stamp:
dh_testdir
- $(MAKE)
+ RSH=/usr/bin/rsh
On Fri, 2006-03-24 at 15:53 +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
If noone minds we reupload tar with a bumped version number to s-p-u.
Ok with me.
Bdale
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Wichert Akkerman) writes:
Previously P Prince wrote:
The eaisest and most failsafe way to secure bind is to install djbdns.
And the simple answer to that is:
1. bind is not DFSG-free and not packaged for Debian which makes it
off-topic here.
s/bind/djbdns/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Wichert Akkerman) writes:
Previously P Prince wrote:
The eaisest and most failsafe way to secure bind is to install djbdns.
And the simple answer to that is:
1. bind is not DFSG-free and not packaged for Debian which makes it
off-topic here.
s/bind/djbdns/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tim Uckun) writes:
Ideally the packages themselves should be labled stable, milestone,
snapshot (or something similar) and you ought to be able to subscribe to
packages themselves.
A good idea, that doesn't work all that well in practice.
Packages rarely stand alone...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tim Uckun) writes:
Ideally the packages themselves should be labled stable, milestone,
snapshot (or something similar) and you ought to be able to subscribe to
packages themselves.
A good idea, that doesn't work all that well in practice.
Packages rarely stand alone...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Juha_J=E4ykk=E4?=) writes:
- xntp3 w/patch (just keeps CAP_SYS_TIME, drops uid 0)
As far as I can recall, xntp3 was split into ntp and ntpdate
somewhere around version 4.
You are correct that the Debian package is now derived from version 4 upstream
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Juha_J=E4ykk=E4?=) writes:
- xntp3 w/patch (just keeps CAP_SYS_TIME, drops uid 0)
As far as I can recall, xntp3 was split into ntp and ntpdate
somewhere around version 4.
You are correct that the Debian package is now derived from version 4 upstream
12 matches
Mail list logo
