Re: Allow password auth for one user with sftp?

On Sun, 2007-01-14 at 14:36 +0100, Adrian von Bidder wrote: On Thursday 11 January 2007 20:15, Michel Messerschmidt wrote: On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 06:55:33PM +0100, Adrian von Bidder wrote: Anybody has an idea if and how this is possible? The obvious but ugly solution would be to run a

Re: Allow password auth for one user with sftp?

On Mon, 2007-01-15 at 16:08 +0100, Adrian von Bidder wrote: On Monday 15 January 2007 10:26, Berend De Schouwer wrote: On Sun, 2007-01-14 at 14:36 +0100, Adrian von Bidder wrote: I have users a, b, c, d, e. All users except e can have shell access, but beecause shell access is powerful

Re: Bind9 stopped after 34 days of uptime

spectrum of humanity as users, the technology is showing its weakness: it was designed to be used by friendly, smart people. Spammers, as an example of a class, are neither friendly nor smart. -- Berend De Schouwer

Re: Bind9 stopped after 34 days of uptime

spectrum of humanity as users, the technology is showing its weakness: it was designed to be used by friendly, smart people. Spammers, as an example of a class, are neither friendly nor smart. -- Berend De Schouwer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe

Re: logging iptables

- Albert Einstein -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Berend De Schouwer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Stupid Question - Proxy Internals

De Schouwer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Stupid Question - Proxy Internals

De Schouwer

Re: Fw: Can a daemon listen only on some interfaces?

destination as if they were for you? My rule above would prevent this whereas your rule would not. Both rules would prevent the attacker trying to circumvent the sshd bound IP address restriction however. Can you explain why you choose your rule. Cheers. Mark. -- Berend De Schouwer

Re: bind appears to restart before the kernel is fully loaded

, 412k reserved, 684k data, 40k init) -- Berend De Schouwer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: bind appears to restart before the kernel is fully loaded

code, 412k reserved, 684k data, 40k init) -- Berend De Schouwer

Re: UDP Port 1035

-- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Berend De Schouwer, +27-11-712-1435, UCS

Re: Re[2]: kernel patches

-- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Berend De Schouwer, +27-11-712-1435, UCS

Re: Sendmail DOS

Berend -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Berend De Schouwer, +27-11-712-1435, UCS -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Sendmail DOS

-- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Berend De Schouwer, +27-11-712-1435, UCS

Re: Sendmail DOS

On Thu, 22 Feb 2001 13:27:07 Antti Tolamo wrote: | At 13:16 22.2.2001, Berend De Schouwer wrote: | | | event a DoS, from | their description, if they are implemented correctly. At least, | they'll offer as much protection as inetd can. I've used them | before when a mail script when crazy

Re: Is debian OpenBSD ftpd secure?

o UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] | with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Kind regards, Berend -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Berend De Schouwer, +27-11-712-1435, UC

Re: Is debian OpenBSD ftpd secure?

On Tue, 30 Jan 2001 16:37:03 Mike Moran wrote: | Berend De Schouwer wrote: | | On Tue, 30 Jan 2001 15:45:50 Mike Moran wrote: | [ ... ] | | | However, SAINT still seems to pick this up as a vulnerability. Is | this | | just because the SAINT detection routines get fooled by the | | almost

Re: Is debian OpenBSD ftpd secure?

of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Kind regards, Berend -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Berend De Schouwer, +27-11-712-1435, UCS

Re: Is debian OpenBSD ftpd secure?

On Tue, 30 Jan 2001 16:37:03 Mike Moran wrote: | Berend De Schouwer wrote: | | On Tue, 30 Jan 2001 15:45:50 Mike Moran wrote: | [ ... ] | | | However, SAINT still seems to pick this up as a vulnerability. Is | this | | just because the SAINT detection routines get fooled by the | | almost

Re: mirroring security.debian.org?

Berend -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Berend De Schouwer, +27-11-712-1435, UCS -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: mirroring security.debian.org?

On Fri, 26 Jan 2001 17:10:51 Giacomo Mulas wrote: | On Fri, 26 Jan 2001, Berend De Schouwer wrote: | | I am in a similar situation. I would also like to have a local | mirror, so that the multiple Debian machines do not need to go | over the internet line. Some do not even have internet

Re: mirroring security.debian.org?

-- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Berend De Schouwer, +27-11-712-1435, UCS -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: mirroring security.debian.org?

-- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Berend De Schouwer, +27-11-712-1435, UCS

Re: mirroring security.debian.org?

On Fri, 26 Jan 2001 17:10:51 Giacomo Mulas wrote: | On Fri, 26 Jan 2001, Berend De Schouwer wrote: | | I am in a similar situation. I would also like to have a local | mirror, so that the multiple Debian machines do not need to go | over the internet line. Some do not even have internet

Re: mirroring security.debian.org?

-- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Berend De Schouwer, +27-11-712-1435, UCS