On Sun, Jul 24, 2005 at 09:54:28AM +0200, Nejc Novak wrote:
> I think one of my servers has been compromised. Since i don't have a lot
> of experiencei with these things, i beg you for your help.
>
> Information i have gathered together till now are the following. Server
> is runnin latest debia
Dear list...
our package 'pdns' in Sarge has a serious bug which can be abused to run a
DoS attack against a name server. My co-maintainer already mailed the
security team but did not get a response yet.
Currently we are preparing a new package to upload into 'unstable'.
How else can we get the f
x "drop-in: "
$IPT -A logdrop -j DROP
# log+drop incoming port 445 traffic
$IPT -A INPUT -i eth1 --dport 445 -j logdrop
Cheers
Christoph
--
Dipl.-Inform Christoph Haas
OTTO GmbH & Co. KG / Wandsbeker Straße 3-7 / 22172 Hamburg
Department IT-KS-SN (Server & Networks)
Phone
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 06:33:07AM -0400, Snyder, Dave (D.F.) wrote:
> Is Linux vulnerable to these unwanted downloads and if so, how do I protect
> Linux so I don't have a similar issue?
In theory, yes. Surfing security depends mainly on your web browser.
However generally security standards on L
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 06:43:28PM -0300, Leandro Rodrigo Saad Cruz wrote:
> I want all users that send email on my smtp gateway to use sasl
> authentication.
You are invited to verify your configuration with my tutorial at
workaround.org/ispmail.shtml - perhaps that'll help you.
> smtpd_recipien
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 06:43:28PM -0300, Leandro Rodrigo Saad Cruz wrote:
> I want all users that send email on my smtp gateway to use sasl
> authentication.
You are invited to verify your configuration with my tutorial at
workaround.org/ispmail.shtml - perhaps that'll help you.
> smtpd_recipien
On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 10:22:33AM +0200, Volker Tanger wrote:
> ...which is the official license to shoot yourself into the foot. What
> happens if I send you a forged, suspicious packet with source-IP equal
> to the IP address of your gateway router, your DNS server, your internal
> system(s), ..
On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 10:22:33AM +0200, Volker Tanger wrote:
> ...which is the official license to shoot yourself into the foot. What
> happens if I send you a forged, suspicious packet with source-IP equal
> to the IP address of your gateway router, your DNS server, your internal
> system(s), ..
On Sun, Jun 29, 2003 at 10:32:54PM +0200, Christian Kujau wrote:
> hm, patches. i'm not good at creating patches. would it help too if i/we
> send you "this word, sentence, page XX.." and the like?
That's a terrible burden for Alexander to create text from it. Please
get the docbook formatted cod
On Sun, Jun 29, 2003 at 10:32:54PM +0200, Christian Kujau wrote:
> hm, patches. i'm not good at creating patches. would it help too if i/we
> send you "this word, sentence, page XX.." and the like?
That's a terrible burden for Alexander to create text from it. Please
get the docbook formatted cod
Hi, Alexander...
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 11:32:56PM +0200, Alexander Schmehl wrote:
> I just finished the translation of the security howto to german, but
> some parts are very ugly hacked.
>
> It would be very nice, if some of you would review my translation (or
> at least small parts of it), an
Hi, Alexander...
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 11:32:56PM +0200, Alexander Schmehl wrote:
> I just finished the translation of the security howto to german, but
> some parts are very ugly hacked.
>
> It would be very nice, if some of you would review my translation (or
> at least small parts of it), an
On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 01:54:33PM +0200, Adam ENDRODI wrote:
> How widely do you think changing the MAC address of a NIC via
> ``ifconfig hw'' is supported by the various network cards
> and drivers out there nowadays?
>
> My collegue and me have debated several times whether watching
> the LAN
On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 01:54:33PM +0200, Adam ENDRODI wrote:
> How widely do you think changing the MAC address of a NIC via
> ``ifconfig hw'' is supported by the various network cards
> and drivers out there nowadays?
>
> My collegue and me have debated several times whether watching
> the LAN
On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 08:29:10PM +0100, Hamish Marson wrote:
> I've noticed some strange traffic on our firewalls recently. Someone (Or
> multiple someones) are attempting to send tcp packets inbound to our
> network FROM well known ports (e.g. port 80) to multiple port numbers,
> and usually
On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 08:29:10PM +0100, Hamish Marson wrote:
> I've noticed some strange traffic on our firewalls recently. Someone (Or
> multiple someones) are attempting to send tcp packets inbound to our
> network FROM well known ports (e.g. port 80) to multiple port numbers,
> and usually
Hi, Daniel...
> I have found a nice "HOSTS" list for windows (similar to the /etc/hosts file
> in linux) which matches some bad sites to localhost, so your pc won't access
> them! With windows this works very nice, but how can I do this with Debian?
This works only when resolving names from the l
17 matches
Mail list logo
