On Tue, 24 Jan 2006, Jaroslaw Tabor wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> Has anyone know a network scanner I can run on Debian to search
you can use the debian package "gnomba" to easily browse through all the
windows shares that are available on your local network... very
straightforward to use!
kind re
On Thu, 26 Aug 2004, Almut Behrens wrote:
On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 01:15:13AM -0400, Hubert Chan wrote:
... So the only useful notion of oneway is that the hash is not easily
invertible (i.e. you can't easily find some string that produces a
given hash value).
So, if you can somehow come up with a
On Tue, 24 Aug 2004, Almut Behrens wrote:
On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 09:18:46PM +0200, Danny De Cock wrote:
On Tue, 24 Aug 2004, Almut Behrens wrote:
On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 12:44:53PM +0200, Danny De Cock wrote:
(...) but the verification of password hashes, such as used in pam,
rely on the hash
On Tue, 24 Aug 2004, Almut Behrens wrote:
On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 12:44:53PM +0200, Danny De Cock wrote:
(...) but the verification of password hashes, such as used in pam,
rely on the hash function's oneway-feature rather than on its
collision-resistance...
not sure I understand -- s
hi,
it is true that collisions have been found in md5 (and a lot of other hash
functions of that `family', cfr. the links you mention).
this means that the hash functions should certainly no longer be used in
applications relying on the collision-resistance of the hash function,
e.g., everythin
have a look at /usr/local/ssl/bin. it may be wise to include
/usr/local/ssl in your default PATH.
cu, g.
On Thu, 3 Jul 2003, Jim wrote:
> Hey,
>
> i have installed openssl latest source, and everything installed fine,
> but when i open a program that requires ssl it tells me ssl not
> install
have a look at /usr/local/ssl/bin. it may be wise to include
/usr/local/ssl in your default PATH.
cu, g.
On Thu, 3 Jul 2003, Jim wrote:
> Hey,
>
> i have installed openssl latest source, and everything installed fine,
> but when i open a program that requires ssl it tells me ssl not
> install
hi,
using mac addresses for client authentication seems to me as an extremely
risky business as a mac address can easily be copied/cloned/spoofed...
imho, it does not offer any authentication at all...
g.
On Fri, 2 May 2003, Hans van Leeuwen wrote:
> Hello,
>
> My company has created an applica
On Sun, 18 Aug 2002, xterm wrote:
> I've been looking for some sort of utility (without success) that will
> look at keyboard/mouse activity in X and then run a couple of
> commands. I don't want to log the current use out (aka: idled
> daemon), or lock the screen with xscreensaver (already done)
On Wed, 14 Aug 2002, Siegbert Baude wrote:
> So we have to think for those, who aren't able to follow this
> discussion, too.
> > I think as a system administrator, one is out of luck if one can't
> > follow the English announcements anyway.
> [snip]
>
> I dislike this attitude "No English, no IT"
10 matches
Mail list logo
