unsubscribe

-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: SOME ITEMS THAT YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN OR BE ABLE TO ADVISE ME ON

Hello, Yes we are *ALL* interested in your crap. So please email everyone with your street address so we can all come to your house and show you our appreciation! As for relavency goes it is relavent. Relavent as in how can we block this crap from the list. Ed -Original Message-

RE: SOME ITEMS THAT YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN OR BE ABLE TO ADVISE ME ON

Hello, Yes we are *ALL* interested in your crap. So please email everyone with your street address so we can all come to your house and show you our appreciation! As for relavency goes it is relavent. Relavent as in how can we block this crap from the list. Ed -Original Message-

RE: Hacked too?

I have run chkrootkit and get Anyone have a d/l site for the deb package of this? Ed -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Hacked too?

I have run chkrootkit and get Anyone have a d/l site for the deb package of this? Ed

some interesting attacks

Hello, Last night some interesting logs came to my inbox from a clients firewall box. Nov 21 23:20:05 system name sshd[11534]: Disconnecting: crc32 compensation attack: network attack detected This went on for a period of time until I went into the box retrieved the ip address of the person

RE: some interesting attacks

Message- From: Alvin Oga [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2001 10:03 AM To: Wichert Akkerman Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: some interesting attacks hi ya Previously Ed Street wrote: Any input/thoughts on this? Just that it's always amusing to watch

some interesting attacks

Hello, Last night some interesting logs came to my inbox from a clients firewall box. Nov 21 23:20:05 system name sshd[11534]: Disconnecting: crc32 compensation attack: network attack detected This went on for a period of time until I went into the box retrieved the ip address of the person and

RE: some interesting attacks

Message- From: Alvin Oga [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2001 10:03 AM To: Wichert Akkerman Cc: debian-security@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: some interesting attacks hi ya Previously Ed Street wrote: Any input/thoughts on this? Just that it's always amusing

SPAM was RE: INSURE GOOD RECEPTION! VITAL EMERGENCY STRATEGY!!!

Hey, Is there *anything* we can do about all this Spam that's getting on this list? Ed -Original Message-From: HotDeals [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 3:01 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: INSURE GOOD RECEPTION! VITAL EMERGENCY STRATEGY!!!

RE: SPAM was RE: INSURE GOOD RECEPTION! VITAL EMERGENCY STRATEGY!!!

To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: SPAM was RE: INSURE GOOD RECEPTION! VITAL EMERGENCY STRATEGY!!! On Friday 09 November 2001 16:43 pm, Sebastiaan wrote: High, On Fri, 9 Nov 2001, Ed Street wrote: Hey, Is there *anything* we can do about all this Spam that's getting on this list

SPAM was RE: INSURE GOOD RECEPTION! VITAL EMERGENCY STRATEGY!!!

Hey, Is there *anything* we can do about all this Spam that's getting on this list? Ed -Original Message-From: HotDeals [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 3:01 AMTo: debian-security@lists.debian.orgSubject: INSURE GOOD RECEPTION! VITAL EMERGENCY

RE: SPAM was RE: INSURE GOOD RECEPTION! VITAL EMERGENCY STRATEGY!!!

-security@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: SPAM was RE: INSURE GOOD RECEPTION! VITAL EMERGENCY STRATEGY!!! On Friday 09 November 2001 16:43 pm, Sebastiaan wrote: High, On Fri, 9 Nov 2001, Ed Street wrote: Hey, Is there *anything* we can do about all this Spam that's getting

RE: Which ssh should I have?

Hello, www.freshmeat.net Or if your running debian do an apt-get install ssh (most recommended) Ed -Original Message- From: Osvaldo Mundim Junior [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2001 7:47 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Which ssh should I have?

RE: Which ssh should I have?

Hello, www.freshmeat.net Or if your running debian do an apt-get install ssh (most recommended) Ed -Original Message- From: Osvaldo Mundim Junior [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2001 7:47 AM To: debian-security@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: Which ssh should

RE: Why do people do this? [Was fishingboat in root]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, You are on a public forum called debian security. Please see the bottom of this email for removal instructions. You was not added without your permission as you had to reply to the email message, and fyi it's not considered Spam in this

RE: Layne (was: Re: Is ident secure?)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, Already sent mail to the list admin on the bottom of each email. Ed - -Original Message- From: Jakub Jankowski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 11:19 PM To: debian-security@lists.debian.org Subject: Layne (was:

RE: Layne (was: Re: Is ident secure?)

?) Ed Street [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Hello, Already sent mail to the list admin on the bottom of each email. I just submitted his address in at http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/unsubscribe to be unsubscribed, hopefully that will work... - --paulv -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version

RE: Problem with logging firewall packets

Hello, # # LOG level option. NOTE klogd reflects these values for console broadcast # Simply start klogd with -c 4 to ONLY display errors and above on the console. LOG_LEVEL=notice #define KERN_EMERG 0 /* system is unusable

RE: Problem with logging firewall packets

Hello, # # LOG level option. NOTE klogd reflects these values for console broadcast # Simply start klogd with -c 4 to ONLY display errors and above on the console. LOG_LEVEL=notice #define KERN_EMERG 0 /* system is unusable

RE: strange log entry

Hello, that's simple ;) If they was stable/non-exploitable then we'd be using rpc inplace of ssh ;) Ed -Original Message- From: Jacob Meuser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 8:41 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: strange log entry On Thu, May 24, 2001 at

RE: Problem with logging firewall packets

Hello, Make sure you have klogd and syslogd running. Ed -Original Message- From: Paul Dossett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 12:00 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Problem with logging firewall packets Hi guys/gals, Okay, I'm *really* embarrassed about

msg from list when posting.

Hello, anyone know why I get this when I post anything to this list? Fatal Error: \n \nQuota for user [EMAIL PROTECTED] exceeded! \n \nOriginal message follows: \n \n it's from their mail delivery subsystem. Ed -Original Message- From: Ed Street [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent

RE: detecting portscanning

Hello, there's several methods to tell that. a) use a product like portsentry b) use iptables/ipchains to reject all forms of portscans c) don't connect the box to the inet as portscans are a fact of life ;) portsentry will trashcan any system that attempts to portscan you. If your using

RE: detecting portscanning

PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 8:11 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: detecting portscanning Ed == Ed Street [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Ed Ed iptables has an awsome mechanism for portscans ;) in fact you Ed can set it up so that all portscans (well most I should say) Ed

RE: strange log entry

Hello, Well first off WHY are you running the rpc stuff? (i.e. I can root a redhat 6.x box in under 30 seconds with a rpc exploit from a clean install) Turn that stuff OFF. Ed -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 1:08 AM

RE: strange log entry

PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 4:34 AM To: debian-security@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: strange log entry On Thu, May 24, 2001 at 01:24:50AM -0400, Ed Street wrote: Hello, Well first off WHY are you running the rpc stuff? (i.e. I can root a redhat 6.x box in under 30 seconds with a rpc

RE: strange log entry

Hello, that's simple ;) If they was stable/non-exploitable then we'd be using rpc inplace of ssh ;) Ed -Original Message- From: Jacob Meuser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 8:41 AM To: debian-security@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: strange log entry On Thu, May

RE: wdm security

Hello, If memory serves me correctly there's a line in /etc/X11 that you can add/modify to tell it to NOT lissen. Ed -Original Message- From: Noah L. Meyerhans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 10:47 AM To: Debian Security List Subject: Re: wdm security On Thu,

RE: Problem with logging firewall packets

Hello, Make sure you have klogd and syslogd running. Ed -Original Message- From: Paul Dossett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 12:00 PM To: debian-security@lists.debian.org Subject: Problem with logging firewall packets Hi guys/gals, Okay, I'm *really*

msg from list when posting.

Hello, anyone know why I get this when I post anything to this list? Fatal Error: \n \nQuota for user [EMAIL PROTECTED] exceeded! \n \nOriginal message follows: \n \n it's from their mail delivery subsystem. Ed -Original Message- From: Ed Street [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent

RE: Problem with logging firewall packets

*/ #define KERN_DEBUG 7 /* debug-level messages */ # Ed -Original Message- From: Paul Dossett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 12:24 PM To: Ed Street; debian-security

RE: detecting portscanning

Hello, there's several methods to tell that. a) use a product like portsentry b) use iptables/ipchains to reject all forms of portscans c) don't connect the box to the inet as portscans are a fact of life ;) portsentry will trashcan any system that attempts to portscan you. If your using 2.2.x

RE: detecting portscanning

PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 8:11 PM To: debian-security@lists.debian.org Subject: RE: detecting portscanning Ed == Ed Street [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Ed Ed iptables has an awsome mechanism for portscans ;) in fact you Ed can set it up so that all portscans (well most I should