Re: best way to create pop only accounts

2002-03-11 Thread Eelco van Beek
Hi, If I were you I'd use Dbmail (www.dbmail.org, cvs version). It has got all this and more. Best regards, Eelco On 11-03-2002 13:21, "Pedro Zorzenon Neto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > Which is the best way to create a POP only account? just change the > last field in /etc/passwd to

Re: best way to create pop only accounts

2002-03-11 Thread Eelco van Beek
Hi, If I were you I'd use Dbmail (www.dbmail.org, cvs version). It has got all this and more. Best regards, Eelco On 11-03-2002 13:21, "Pedro Zorzenon Neto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > Which is the best way to create a POP only account? just change the > last field in /etc/passwd t

Re: [2] Mailserver HDD organization

2002-01-19 Thread Eelco van Beek
gards, Eelco On Sat, 2002-01-19 at 19:41, Wichert Akkerman wrote: > Previously Eelco van Beek wrote: > > Why not put your mail into a database?. No more security and scalability > > hassles. (www.dbmail.org) > > Because it restricts you to using dbmail stuff. Personally I

Re: [2] Mailserver HDD organization

2002-01-19 Thread Eelco van Beek
Why not put your mail into a database?. No more security and scalability hassles. (www.dbmail.org) Best regards, Eelco On Sat, 2002-01-19 at 19:07, Hans-Joachim Picht wrote: > On Sat, Jan 19, 2002 at 01:04:00PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hi Thomas, > > > why schould i not use exim for

Re: [2] Mailserver HDD organization

2002-01-19 Thread Eelco van Beek
gards, Eelco On Sat, 2002-01-19 at 19:41, Wichert Akkerman wrote: > Previously Eelco van Beek wrote: > > Why not put your mail into a database?. No more security and scalability > > hassles. (www.dbmail.org) > > Because it restricts you to using dbmail stuff. Personally I

Re: [2] Mailserver HDD organization

2002-01-19 Thread Eelco van Beek
Why not put your mail into a database?. No more security and scalability hassles. (www.dbmail.org) Best regards, Eelco On Sat, 2002-01-19 at 19:07, Hans-Joachim Picht wrote: > On Sat, Jan 19, 2002 at 01:04:00PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hi Thomas, > > > why schould i not use exim fo

Re: The Next Yahoo

2001-02-06 Thread IC&S - Eelco van Beek
Where is a moderator when you need one? On Mon, 5 Feb 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > * > Hi, debian-security > > What if Yahoo Paid You ? Now a reality !!! > > World's first completely commissionable Portal just released. > > Get paid as thous

Re: The Next Yahoo

2001-02-05 Thread IC&S - Eelco van Beek
Where is a moderator when you need one? On Mon, 5 Feb 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > * > Hi, debian-security > > What if Yahoo Paid You ? Now a reality !!! > > World's first completely commissionable Portal just released. > > Get paid as thou

Re: Port forwarding for potato

2001-02-01 Thread IC&S - Eelco van Beek
Even more stable: use fastforward (it's on freshmeat somewhere). Eelco On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, [iso-8859-1] Johan Bergstr?m wrote: > > There is also a little application called redir. > Simple and easy. > > Johbe > > On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Michael Boman wrote: > > > Kelsey Damas wrote: > > > > > >

Re: Port forwarding for potato

2001-02-01 Thread IC&S - Eelco van Beek
Even more stable: use fastforward (it's on freshmeat somewhere). Eelco On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, [iso-8859-1] Johan Bergström wrote: > > There is also a little application called redir. > Simple and easy. > > Johbe > > On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Michael Boman wrote: > > > Kelsey Damas wrote: > > > > > >

Re: portsentry dangerous? hardly

2001-01-29 Thread IC&S - Eelco van Beek
rts that do have a specific function (imap, smtp etc). Real crackers are more host specific. They don't do subnetscans. Ciao, Eelco van Beek

Re: portsentry dangerous? hardly

2001-01-29 Thread IC&S - Eelco van Beek
ns for certain ports that you're machine isn't providing any services for (services like rpc and lpd are mostly not usefull for other people on a webserver). In those cases portsentry will block those hosts completely without the risk of trying exploits on service ports that do have a speci

Re: Suspending services

2001-01-29 Thread IC&S - Eelco van Beek
Hi Piotr, Just use one of the free runlevels (4,5 even 2). Go to /etc/rc and remove the links that you don't need and add the ones you do. After that you can switch to that runlevel bij doing telinit . All your services will be started and stopped for that runlevel. Good luck, Eelco van

Re: Suspending services

2001-01-29 Thread IC&S - Eelco van Beek
Hi Piotr, Just use one of the free runlevels (4,5 even 2). Go to /etc/rc and remove the links that you don't need and add the ones you do. After that you can switch to that runlevel bij doing telinit . All your services will be started and stopped for that runlevel. Good luck, Eelco van