, ...
--
Emmanuel Lacour Easter-eggs
44-46 rue de l'Ouest - 75014 Paris - France - Métro Gaité
Phone: +33 (0) 1 43 35 00 37- Fax: +33 (0) 1 41 35 00 76
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -http://www.easter-eggs.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
'
--
Emmanuel Lacour Easter-eggs
44-46 rue de l'Ouest - 75014 Paris - France - Métro Gaité
Phone: +33 (0) 1 43 35 00 37- Fax: +33 (0) 1 41 35 00 76
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -http://www.easter-eggs.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
children
Just checkout: man spamd
I would suggest having a look at amavisd-new for running SA. I saw a big
performance gain when switching from spamc+spamd to amavisd-new + SA
deb http://www.backports.org/debian/ woody amavisd-new
--
Emmanuel Lacour Easter
children
Just checkout: man spamd
I would suggest having a look at amavisd-new for running SA. I saw a big
performance gain when switching from spamc+spamd to amavisd-new + SA
deb http://www.backports.org/debian/ woody amavisd-new
--
Emmanuel Lacour Easter
Hi,
For the first time I saw those curious errors. I don't understand where
is the error, in my bind or in the remote client/server??
Any idea?
Apr 21 22:00:50 volubilis named[12517]: socket.c:1100: unexpected error:
Apr 21 22:00:50 volubilis named[12517]: internal_send: 203.147.0.49#0:
Hi,
For the first time I saw those curious errors. I don't understand where
is the error, in my bind or in the remote client/server??
Any idea?
Apr 21 22:00:50 volubilis named[12517]: socket.c:1100: unexpected error:
Apr 21 22:00:50 volubilis named[12517]: internal_send: 203.147.0.49#0:
Hi,
As i saw that some people uses my packages with the chroot patch for
woody, and as sarge is going to be stable in a week, a month, a year or
so ;-), I just wan't to notice that I now maintain also the unofficial
ssh package with chroot patch for sarge.
(those packages are just the latest
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 01:24:31PM +0700, Jean Christophe ANDRÉ wrote:
* Raffaele D'Elia wrote:
This antivirus should protect web clients, not the proxy itself: I'm
quite sure I've already protected the server choosing debian...
Le vendredi 27 février 2004 à 12h38 (+0100), Norbert
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 01:24:31PM +0700, Jean Christophe ANDRÉ wrote:
* Raffaele D'Elia wrote:
This antivirus should protect web clients, not the proxy itself: I'm
quite sure I've already protected the server choosing debian...
Le vendredi 27 février 2004 à 12h38 (+0100), Norbert
-7955TMP.txt.gz file could be?
It's a gzip file of the perl modules available from CPAN...
Try zcat your_file
--
Emmanuel Lacour Easter-eggs
44-46 rue de l'Ouest - 75014 Paris - France - Métro Gaité
Phone: +33 (0) 1 43 35 00 37- Fax: +33 (0) 1 41 35 00 76
generated at the time you create the md5
pass.
--
Emmanuel Lacour Easter-eggs
44-46 rue de l'Ouest - 75014 Paris - France - Métro Gaité
Phone: +33 (0) 1 43 35 00 37- Fax: +33 (0) 1 41 35 00 76
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -http://www.easter
generated at the time you create the md5
pass.
--
Emmanuel Lacour Easter-eggs
44-46 rue de l'Ouest - 75014 Paris - France - Métro Gaité
Phone: +33 (0) 1 43 35 00 37- Fax: +33 (0) 1 41 35 00 76
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -http://www.easter
fix)
--
Emmanuel Lacour Easter-eggs
44-46 rue de l'Ouest - 75014 Paris - France - Métro Gaité
Phone: +33 (0) 1 43 35 00 37- Fax: +33 (0) 1 41 35 00 76
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -http://www.easter-eggs.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 12:41:48PM +0200, Lukas Ruf wrote:
do you also provide the sources of your unofficial distribution?
I just uploaded them (http://debian.home-dn.net/woody/ssh/)
apt-get source should work too
--
Emmanuel Lacour Easter-eggs
44
On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 12:41:48PM +0200, Lukas Ruf wrote:
do you also provide the sources of your unofficial distribution?
I just uploaded them (http://debian.home-dn.net/woody/ssh/)
apt-get source should work too
--
Emmanuel Lacour Easter-eggs
44
..., but it
seems to be in kernel-source-2.4.20!!!
+kernel-source-2.4.20 (2.4.20-3woody.2) stable; urgency=low
+
+ * Fixed ptrace security hole.
--
Emmanuel Lacour Easter-eggs
44-46 rue de l'Ouest - 75014 Paris - France - Métro Gaité
Phone: +33 (0) 1 43 35 00 37
to build it...
--
Emmanuel Lacour Easter-eggs
44-46 rue de l'Ouest - 75014 Paris - France - Métro Gaité
Phone: +33 (0) 1 43 35 00 37- Fax: +33 (0) 1 41 35 00 76
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -http://www.easter-eggs.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
, so I prepared a backport to woody of
opengate-proxy, an h323 proxy present in sid. I will test this soon
(this week probably).
deb http://debian.home-dn.net/woody opengate-proxy/
--
Emmanuel Lacour Easter-eggs
44-46 rue de l'Ouest - 75014 Paris - France
to build it...
--
Emmanuel Lacour Easter-eggs
44-46 rue de l'Ouest - 75014 Paris - France - Métro Gaité
Phone: +33 (0) 1 43 35 00 37- Fax: +33 (0) 1 41 35 00 76
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -http://www.easter-eggs.com
Hi,
Is there someone having information about this web vulnerability, goals
and risks and how to disable it?
--
Emmanuel Lacour Easter-eggs
44-46 rue de l'Ouest - 75014 Paris - France - Métro Gaité
Phone: +33 (0) 1 43 35 00 37- Fax: +33 (0
Hi,
Is there someone having information about this web vulnerability, goals
and risks and how to disable it?
--
Emmanuel Lacour Easter-eggs
44-46 rue de l'Ouest - 75014 Paris - France - Métro Gaité
Phone: +33 (0) 1 43 35 00 37- Fax: +33 (0
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 11:28:29AM +0100, Stefan Neufeind wrote:
On 20 Feb 2003 at 9:59, Alan James wrote:
On Thu, 20 Feb 2003 05:35:01 +, Dale Amon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
or maybe a FreeS/WAN implementation for cygwin (is there a native
win implementation?) ... but thats a
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 11:28:29AM +0100, Stefan Neufeind wrote:
On 20 Feb 2003 at 9:59, Alan James wrote:
On Thu, 20 Feb 2003 05:35:01 +, Dale Amon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
or maybe a FreeS/WAN implementation for cygwin (is there a native
win implementation?) ... but thats a
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 07:25:35PM +0100, Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote:
## Emmanuel Lacour ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
What about adding in default httpd.conf something like this to protect
from reading common editors backup files (index.php~ ...)
What about using the Right Editor[tm
What about adding in default httpd.conf something like this to protect
from reading common editors backup files (index.php~ ...)
FilesMatch .*(~|\.bak)$
Order allow,deny
Deny from all
/FilesMatch
I think it could avoid fresh debian installs (and fresh admins...)
giving us some unwanted
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 07:25:35PM +0100, Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote:
## Emmanuel Lacour ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
What about adding in default httpd.conf something like this to protect
from reading common editors backup files (index.php~ ...)
What about using the Right Editor[tm
On Sat, Dec 14, 2002 at 02:27:48PM +0100, Matthias Hentges wrote:
Hello all!
I'm in the process of setting up a dedicated firewall for my home
network. It only runs four services: smtp, snmp, ssh and fwlogwatch.
I've run into a problem configuring snmpd to only use a fixed local IP.
From
On Sat, Dec 14, 2002 at 02:27:48PM +0100, Matthias Hentges wrote:
Hello all!
I'm in the process of setting up a dedicated firewall for my home
network. It only runs four services: smtp, snmp, ssh and fwlogwatch.
I've run into a problem configuring snmpd to only use a fixed local IP.
From
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 10:55:28AM +, jjj3 wrote:
Hi All,
Logs in my firewall shows me incoming connections to port 113 of the
firewall!! What it means?
start here!!
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=port+113meta=site%3Dgroups
--
Easter-eggs
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 12:26:12PM +0100, Mathieu Laurent wrote:
Hi,
My webserver with apache (+ mod_ssl) failed when I receive a worms attack.
I see this message in the error log: [error] [client xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx]
client sent HTTP/1.1 request without hostname (see RFC2616 section 14.23):
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 02:59:32PM +0100, Mathieu Laurent wrote:
It 's not the error messages when logrotate reload apache config. I have
this problem after a request.
I have two webserver with the same config. And I can see that the two
servers receive this request and one of them died
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 10:55:28AM +, jjj3 wrote:
Hi All,
Logs in my firewall shows me incoming connections to port 113 of the
firewall!! What it means?
start here!!
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=port+113meta=site%3Dgroups
--
Easter-eggs
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 12:26:12PM +0100, Mathieu Laurent wrote:
Hi,
My webserver with apache (+ mod_ssl) failed when I receive a worms attack.
I see this message in the error log: [error] [client xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx]
client sent HTTP/1.1 request without hostname (see RFC2616 section 14.23):
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 02:59:32PM +0100, Mathieu Laurent wrote:
It 's not the error messages when logrotate reload apache config. I have
this problem after a request.
I have two webserver with the same config. And I can see that the two
servers receive this request and one of them died
On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 07:26:13PM +0200, Costas Magos wrote:
Hi all,
Anyone knows what 1025 udp stands for? This is a newly installed woody
on a sparc classic.
try
netstat -lp
as root, to show the pid doing this.
--
Easter-eggsSpécialiste GNU/Linux
On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 07:26:13PM +0200, Costas Magos wrote:
Hi all,
Anyone knows what 1025 udp stands for? This is a newly installed woody
on a sparc classic.
try
netstat -lp
as root, to show the pid doing this.
--
Easter-eggsSpécialiste GNU/Linux
On Sat, Nov 09, 2002 at 03:48:39AM +0100, Michael Ablassmeier wrote:
On Sat, Nov 09, 2002 at 12:32:40AM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
You could have a proper MTA outside the chroots (like postfix or exim). And
a bogus, stupid, cat-it-to-localhost-port-25 MTA inside the chroot,
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 03:24:06PM +0100, Domonkos Czinke wrote:
Hi ppl :)
My question is related to a chrooted Apache(+php) and Mysql. They live
in two different chrooted environment and the problem is that I have
several php programs which wanna use the mysql, but they can't use it
since
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 03:24:06PM +0100, Domonkos Czinke wrote:
Hi ppl :)
My question is related to a chrooted Apache(+php) and Mysql. They live
in two different chrooted environment and the problem is that I have
several php programs which wanna use the mysql, but they can't use it
since
I'm in doubt, the difference between 1.3.26 and 1.3.27 is security
bugfix. Is the 1.3.26 debian apache from security containing all of those
bugfixes?
--
Easter-eggsSpécialiste GNU/Linux
44-46 rue de l'Ouest - 75014 Paris - France - Métro Gaité
Phone: +33
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 03:10:13PM +0700, Indra Kusuma wrote:
On Thu, 5 Sep 2002, David Raulo wrote:
# Did you login via SSH ??
#
#
# No (I don't have a sshd running). The problem occurs when I log directly on
# console, or when I do su - from an xterm.
# Have you got an idea?
hmm ..
On Tue, Jun 04, 2002 at 09:58:55AM -0400, Jon McCain wrote:
Renato Lozano wrote:
Hi All,
I am trying to implement a way of transfering files securely over the
snip
You can remove the sftp-server program to disable
On Tue, Jun 04, 2002 at 09:58:55AM -0400, Jon McCain wrote:
Renato Lozano wrote:
Hi All,
I am trying to implement a way of transfering files securely over the
snip
You can remove the sftp-server program to disable sftp
Is there anyone working in/near Coventry in England who can act as a
debian consultant for file server installation/admin.
Thx.
Reply directly to me ... this is out of list topic
--
Easter-eggsSpécialiste GNU/Linux
44-46 rue de l'Ouest - 75014
Is there anyone working in/near Coventry in England who can act as a
debian consultant for file server installation/admin.
Thx.
Reply directly to me ... this is out of list topic
--
Easter-eggsSpécialiste GNU/Linux
44-46 rue de l'Ouest - 75014
PROTECTED]
To: Emmanuel Lacour [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: cups security
Hmmm . . . you forgot,
apt-get install cupsys-driver-gimpprint
gunzip driver.gz
cp driver /usr/share/cups/model
I guess that is only if the proper driver isn't included with cups.
Yep, that's only for unsuported
PROTECTED]
To: Emmanuel Lacour [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: cups security
Hmmm . . . you forgot,
apt-get install cupsys-driver-gimpprint
gunzip driver.gz
cp driver /usr/share/cups/model
I guess that is only if the proper driver isn't included with cups.
Yep, that's only for unsuported
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 09:56:51AM -0500, Torrin wrote:
Good morning everybody, well at least morning over here in Cali. For
everybody else, Good afternoon, good evening and good night.
I just installed cups and I was wondering if it's possible to have cups
run properly without having port
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 06:56:30PM +0200, eim wrote:
First of all thanks to all for responses.
On Wed, 2002-04-03 at 20:22, Holger Eitzenberger wrote:
On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 09:16:03AM +0200, Emmanuel Lacour wrote:
'time' is RFC 868, a pre-NTP time synchronization protocol. It just
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 06:56:30PM +0200, eim wrote:
First of all thanks to all for responses.
On Wed, 2002-04-03 at 20:22, Holger Eitzenberger wrote:
On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 09:16:03AM +0200, Emmanuel Lacour wrote:
'time' is RFC 868, a pre-NTP time synchronization protocol. It just
On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 11:49:53AM -0700, Will Aoki wrote:
On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 10:23:21AM -0800, Anne Carasik wrote:
On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 07:45:21PM +0200, eim wrote:
A question about some network services
==
Hallo Debian folks,
By
On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 11:49:53AM -0700, Will Aoki wrote:
On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 10:23:21AM -0800, Anne Carasik wrote:
On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 07:45:21PM +0200, eim wrote:
A question about some network services
==
Hallo Debian folks,
By
On Sat, Mar 30, 2002 at 10:24:28PM -0500, Jon McCain wrote:
I've been playing around with the scp and sftp components of putty and
noticed what I consider a security hole. Winscp does the same thing.
The user can change to directories above their home. Is there a way to
chroot them like
On Sat, Mar 30, 2002 at 10:24:28PM -0500, Jon McCain wrote:
I've been playing around with the scp and sftp components of putty and
noticed what I consider a security hole. Winscp does the same thing.
The user can change to directories above their home. Is there a way to
chroot them like you
On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 04:10:10PM +0100, Alexander Reelsen wrote:
Hiya
On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 03:40:18PM +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 09:21:45AM -0300, Pedro Zorzenon Neto wrote:
Which is the best way to create a POP only account? just change
On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 04:10:10PM +0100, Alexander Reelsen wrote:
Hiya
On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 03:40:18PM +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
wrote:
On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 09:21:45AM -0300, Pedro Zorzenon Neto wrote:
Which is the best way to create a POP only account? just change
Hi,
I'm just testing mysql authentication with pam and libnss and I saw that
all files in /etc/pam.d/ are 0644 mode. But with libpam-mysql I have to
put in /etc/pam.d/qpopper (for example) login and password of the user
who can show paswords in my database
So who can tell me one thing which
On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 09:16:05AM -0800, J C Lawrence wrote:
On 17 Jan 2002 07:06:37 +0100
eim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was thinking about a partition for /, one for boot, one for
/var/spool/mail and some other important system parts.
MTAs are inherently disk IO bound. As such,
On Mon, Nov 12, 2001 at 10:46:13AM +0100, Beno?t MARTINET wrote:
Hi,
I've just compiled installed openssh-3.0p1 on my Debian 2.2 but failed
to login
using root and users' passwords. Password authentication failed all the time
and it
prompted Permission Denied on the command line.
Hi,
I've got an ix86 with woody installed today, made a separate partition
for /tmp and mounted it noexec (I thinks it's a good Idea...).
When apt-get installing ntpdate, I got the folowing error:
Can't exec /tmp/config.4271: Permission denied at
/usr/share/perl/5.6.1/IPC/Open3.pm line 159
...
Ok, thanks for all the comments, I remember have been seen that we could
run a program in a noexec partition like you said. So I will continue
without noexec (and do more stuff on more usefull security tricks). Just
one question:
What's the use of noexec flag???
--
Easter-eggs
Hi,
I've got an ix86 with woody installed today, made a separate partition
for /tmp and mounted it noexec (I thinks it's a good Idea...).
When apt-get installing ntpdate, I got the folowing error:
Can't exec /tmp/config.4271: Permission denied at
/usr/share/perl/5.6.1/IPC/Open3.pm line 159
...
Ok, thanks for all the comments, I remember have been seen that we could
run a program in a noexec partition like you said. So I will continue
without noexec (and do more stuff on more usefull security tricks). Just
one question:
What's the use of noexec flag???
--
Easter-eggs
On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 01:51:48PM +0100, Christian Kurz wrote:
On 29/10/01, Emmanuel Lacour wrote:
On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 09:48:00AM +1300, Stephen Andrew wrote:
What about a package ssh-chroot in debian? I think the pam module is
more interesting as it can be aplied to other thinks
On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 09:48:00AM +1300, Stephen Andrew wrote:
There is a chroot patch for the potato openssh-1.2.3 source in /contrib
however it appears to be broken.
I have created a modified diff for the Debian package source which will
apply the patch correctly and build an
On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 01:51:48PM +0100, Christian Kurz wrote:
On 29/10/01, Emmanuel Lacour wrote:
On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 09:48:00AM +1300, Stephen Andrew wrote:
What about a package ssh-chroot in debian? I think the pam module is
more interesting as it can be aplied to other thinks
On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 12:09:36PM +0200, Emmanuel Lacour wrote:
Hi,
It's maybe a little bit off topic, but I think someone in this list can
help me:
I've got a firewall debian potato, kernel 2.2.17pre6, doing masquerading
and other rules over an adsl pppoe line. All worked perfectly
On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 12:09:36PM +0200, Emmanuel Lacour wrote:
Hi,
It's maybe a little bit off topic, but I think someone in this list can
help me:
I've got a firewall debian potato, kernel 2.2.17pre6, doing masquerading
and other rules over an adsl pppoe line. All worked perfectly
Hi,
It's maybe a little bit off topic, but I think someone in this list can
help me:
I've got a firewall debian potato, kernel 2.2.17pre6, doing masquerading
and other rules over an adsl pppoe line. All worked perfectly but since
two weeks ( without doing any changes ) I'm unable to go to
Hi,
It's maybe a little bit off topic, but I think someone in this list can
help me:
I've got a firewall debian potato, kernel 2.2.17pre6, doing masquerading
and other rules over an adsl pppoe line. All worked perfectly but since
two weeks ( without doing any changes ) I'm unable to go to
On Sat, 22 Sep 2001 03:33:31 -0800
Ethan Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Sep 22, 2001 at 10:30:53AM +0200, Luca Gibelli wrote:
I created a new account for testing purposes and put the following limits on
its password age:
known bug in potato's ssh, password expiration
On Sat, 22 Sep 2001 03:33:31 -0800
Ethan Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Sep 22, 2001 at 10:30:53AM +0200, Luca Gibelli wrote:
I created a new account for testing purposes and put the following limits on
its password age:
known bug in potato's ssh, password expiration simply
On Thu, 23 Aug 2001 11:09:59 -0500
Paul C. Nendick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The reason the web based solution to this is not forthcoming is
that this is not a web problem. The real solution is to hire
trustworthy admins capable of learning the right way to admin
their systems. I'm not
On Thu, 23 Aug 2001 13:26:45 +0200
Michael Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I haven't been following the thread. Do you get the message as
soon as you run sshd or just when someone tries to log in?
I get the message when I try to do an scp from local to the chrooted host(as it must
run scp
Hi,
I wan't to get some opinions on doing this:
Making someone to be able to create unix users by an http method (from an http
browser).
Making someone to be able to restart a daemon under the identity of root from http.
I think about some methods:
Running a cgi or
On Thu, 23 Aug 2001 15:21:32 +0200
Jean Baptiste Lallement [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
U could use sudo ?
Excerpt from http://www.courtesan.com/sudo/
---
Sudo (superuser do) allows a system administrator to give certain
users (or groups of users) the ability to run some (or all)
On Thu, 23 Aug 2001 11:19:58 +0100
Nick Phillips [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone having an Idea?
Can't see that you got a response to this... you probably need the PAM
stuff in the chroot (most likely just /etc/pam.d/ssh, but maybe /etc/pam.conf
or other stuff in pam.d).
Cheers,
On Thu, 23 Aug 2001 13:26:45 +0200
Michael Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I haven't been following the thread. Do you get the message as
soon as you run sshd or just when someone tries to log in?
I get the message when I try to do an scp from local to the chrooted host(as it
must run scp
Hi,
I wan't to get some opinions on doing this:
Making someone to be able to create unix users by an http method (from an http
browser).
Making someone to be able to restart a daemon under the identity of root from
http.
I think about some methods:
Running a cgi or
On Thu, 23 Aug 2001 09:46:52 -0400 (EDT)
Eric LeBlanc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do u know webmin?
http://webadmin.sourceforge.net/webmin/
Of course, but I think it's not necessary to use an as big program for this
purpose.
--
Easter-eggsSpécialiste
On Thu, 23 Aug 2001 15:21:32 +0200
Jean Baptiste Lallement [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
U could use sudo ?
Excerpt from http://www.courtesan.com/sudo/
---
Sudo (superuser do) allows a system administrator to give certain
users (or groups of users) the ability to run some (or all)
On Thu, 23 Aug 2001 15:21:23 +0100
Karl E. Jorgensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sounds like you're getting into doing normal remote admin of a box.
But why over HTTP ? If you have network connectivity to it, ssh should
do the job (ssh in as yourself and su/sudo to root?).
If you can get to
On Fri, 17 Aug 2001 14:01:54 -0400
Dan Hutchinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to setup a VPN between the Sparc and and Intel PC, but
the Sparc only has one NIC, will this be a problem?
Does a Linux VPN work with a commercial VPN such as Gauntlet or Checkpoint?
Browse the
On Fri, 17 Aug 2001 14:01:54 -0400
Dan Hutchinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to setup a VPN between the Sparc and and Intel PC, but
the Sparc only has one NIC, will this be a problem?
Does a Linux VPN work with a commercial VPN such as Gauntlet or Checkpoint?
Browse the
Hi,
I used openssh-2.9p2-4 from sid, recompiled for potato, it works fine. After
applying the chroot patch from the contrib directory, ssh sftp scp works fine
with this new version on a standard user, but with a chrooted user in his home
directory, only ssh and sftp works, scp
Hi,
I need a pop3 proxy to protect a bad pop3server (Exc...ge). I founded:
popular
pop3proxy
perdition
Is there anyone who used some of them. What is the best from a security view (I
will not have a lot of connections on it).
Thanks.
pgp0iDprHXzWh.pgp
Description: PGP
86 matches
Mail list logo
