RE: pop mail recommendations

illip Hofmeister [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 06 December 2002 13:43 > To: Jeff AA > Cc: debian-security@lists.debian.org > Subject: Re: pop mail recommendations > > > On Fri, 06 Dec 2002 at 12:48:19PM -, Jeff AA wrote: > > We have exim / courier [pop imap pops imap

RE: pop mail recommendations

Second the recommendation for courier. We have exim / courier [pop imap pops imaps] using maildir formats and controlled from mysql for virtual users accepting mail for about 20 domains. We did compare with Cyrus, but that fell down on integration with exim. This is the list dpkg -l *courier* |

RE: pop mail recommendations

illip Hofmeister [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 06 December 2002 13:43 > To: Jeff AA > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: pop mail recommendations > > > On Fri, 06 Dec 2002 at 12:48:19PM -, Jeff AA wrote: > > We have exim / courier [pop imap pops imaps] using maildi

RE: pop mail recommendations

Second the recommendation for courier. We have exim / courier [pop imap pops imaps] using maildir formats and controlled from mysql for virtual users accepting mail for about 20 domains. We did compare with Cyrus, but that fell down on integration with exim. This is the list dpkg -l *courier* |

RE: [d-security] woody apache/ssl - security issue?

Thanks you for the heads up! Some quick research and I conclude we have not been infected for the following reasons: *) no compiler on the webserver *) no /tmp files or processes [cinik unlock uubugtraq bugtraq] *) tripwires not reporting altered binaries etc *) no unusual network traffic on ports

RE: [d-security] woody apache/ssl - security issue?

Thanks you for the heads up! Some quick research and I conclude we have not been infected for the following reasons: *) no compiler on the webserver *) no /tmp files or processes [cinik unlock uubugtraq bugtraq] *) tripwires not reporting altered binaries etc *) no unusual network traffic on port