done!
a href=mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]John Galt /a
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
done!
a href=mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]John Galt /a
to the expectations one gets on a first
read.
Prelude will actually use snort as a sensor...
What say ye?
- --
a mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Who is John Galt?/a
Failure is not an option. It comes bundled with your Microsoft product.
-- Ferenc Mantfeld
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version
to the expectations one gets on a first
read.
Prelude will actually use snort as a sensor...
What say ye?
- --
a mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Who is John Galt?/a
Failure is not an option. It comes bundled with your Microsoft product.
-- Ferenc Mantfeld
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version
?
none at all.
- --
When you are having a bad day, and it seems like everybody is trying to
tick you off, remember that it takes 42 muscles to produce a frown, but
only 4 muscles to work the trigger of a good sniper rifle.
Who is John galt? [EMAIL PROTECTED], that's who!
-BEGIN PGP
?
none at all.
- --
When you are having a bad day, and it seems like everybody is trying to
tick you off, remember that it takes 42 muscles to produce a frown, but
only 4 muscles to work the trigger of a good sniper rifle.
Who is John galt? [EMAIL PROTECTED], that's who!
-BEGIN PGP
the USA is going? Have you learned nothing?
--
Galt's sci-fi paradox: Stormtroopers versus Redshirts to the death.
Who is John Galt? [EMAIL PROTECTED], that's who!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the USA is going? Have you learned nothing?
--
Galt's sci-fi paradox: Stormtroopers versus Redshirts to the death.
Who is John Galt? [EMAIL PROTECTED], that's who!
and reported in
DSA-134
The 3.3p1 packages are vulnerable in some configurations. :-(
--
Customer: I'm running Windows '98 Tech: Yes. Customer:
My computer isn't working now. Tech: Yes, you said that.
Who is John Galt? [EMAIL PROTECTED], that's who!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
why using su root later would be worse. Can you
enlighten me?
--
FINE, I take it back: UNfuck you!
Who is John Galt? [EMAIL PROTECTED], that's who!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
networks,
firewalls, and such. The most obvious rule here is don't rely on any one
layer. Your above statement really relies on the patch vulnerabilities
layer, which means you violated the obvious rule.
c ya
alvin
On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, John Galt wrote:
That's how monkey.org got taken over
.
Who is John Galt? [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
Who is John Galt? [EMAIL PROTECTED]
a significant loss in security policy.
Now that woody draws near to being stable, perhaps the policy can be
altered to accomodate for that.
Micah
--
void hamlet()
{#define question=((bb)||(!bb))}
Who is John Galt? [EMAIL PROTECTED] that's who!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity.
Who is John Galt? [EMAIL PROTECTED], that's who!
how can you do an intrusion attack on a firewall
that you cannot address?
I like to think they call something like that Hogwash...:)
--
The early worm gets the bird.
Who is John Galt? [EMAIL PROTECTED], that's who!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
how can you do an intrusion attack on a firewall
that you cannot address?
I like to think they call something like that Hogwash...:)
--
The early worm gets the bird.
Who is John Galt? [EMAIL PROTECTED], that's who!
-Followup-To is a non-standard, un-RFC documented, generally
unsupported header.
This has been done to death on -devel. RFC 2076. However, the last part
about generally unsupported is right.
--
I can be immature if I want to, because I'm mature enough to make my own
decisions.
Who is John
mature enough to make my own
decisions.
Who is John Galt? [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Followup-To is a non-standard, un-RFC documented, generally
unsupported header.
This has been done to death on -devel. RFC 2076. However, the last part
about generally unsupported is right.
--
I can be immature if I want to, because I'm mature enough to make my own
decisions.
Who is John
mature enough to make my own
decisions.
Who is John Galt? [EMAIL PROTECTED]
)||(!bb))}
Who is John Galt? [EMAIL PROTECTED] that's who!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
))}
Who is John Galt? [EMAIL PROTECTED] that's who!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
))}
Who is John Galt? [EMAIL PROTECTED] that's who!
rulesets...
tks a lot...
--
Galt's sci-fi paradox: Stormtroopers versus Redshirts to the death.
Who is John Galt? [EMAIL PROTECTED], that's who!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
rulesets...
tks a lot...
--
Galt's sci-fi paradox: Stormtroopers versus Redshirts to the death.
Who is John Galt? [EMAIL PROTECTED], that's who!
On Tue, 23 Oct 2001, Martin Schulze wrote:
John Galt wrote:
On Tue, 23 Oct 2001, Martin Schulze wrote:
John Galt wrote:
It really didn't need to go to -devel in the first place: this is internal
to debian-security until there's a candidate. Folloups redirected.
Err... you have
On 22 Oct 2001, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
John Galt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 22 Oct 2001, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
John Galt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I take it then that you volunteer. If not, shut up. Throwing artifical
barriers at this office isn't going to add
On 22 Oct 2001, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
John Galt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
They aren't reasonable things to add at the last minute. The search
happened, AFAICT there is a candidate, yet you had to object now. If it
was so reasonable, why didn't you mention it when it came up
On Tue, 23 Oct 2001, Martin Schulze wrote:
John Galt wrote:
It really didn't need to go to -devel in the first place: this is internal
to debian-security until there's a candidate. Folloups redirected.
Err... you have noticed that there are already two people filling
this position, haven't
On Tue, 23 Oct 2001, Martin Schulze wrote:
John Galt wrote:
On Tue, 23 Oct 2001, Martin Schulze wrote:
John Galt wrote:
It really didn't need to go to -devel in the first place: this is
internal
to debian-security until there's a candidate. Folloups redirected.
Err... you have
message id's.
On Mon, Oct 22, 2001 at 09:43:05AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
John Galt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I take it then that you volunteer. If not, shut up. Throwing artifical
barriers at this office isn't going to add volunteers.
How is it a barrier
On 22 Oct 2001, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
John Galt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 22 Oct 2001, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
John Galt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I take it then that you volunteer. If not, shut up. Throwing artifical
barriers at this office isn't going to add
On 22 Oct 2001, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
John Galt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
They aren't reasonable things to add at the last minute. The search
happened, AFAICT there is a candidate, yet you had to object now. If it
was so reasonable, why didn't you mention it when it came up
On 22 Oct 2001, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
John Galt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The whole problem here is they DIDN'T ask you. You threw in your two
cents worth without a corresponding pledge of support.
It's a public mailing list, and I was simply contributing my
suggestion. You
volunteer. If not, shut up. Throwing artifical
barriers at this office isn't going to add volunteers.
But it doesn't have to be someone who is already a Debian developer,
and I have no objection to fast-tracking their application.
--
Be Careful! I have a black belt in sna-fu!
Who is John
On 22 Oct 2001, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
John Galt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I take it then that you volunteer. If not, shut up. Throwing artifical
barriers at this office isn't going to add volunteers.
How is it a barrier?
It's an extra qualification. It's one that until you
On Mon, 22 Oct 2001, Colin Phipps wrote:
On Mon, Oct 22, 2001 at 07:12:57AM -0600, John Galt wrote:
On 21 Oct 2001, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Q: Is a requirement being a Debian developer?
No. It is my understanding that it would be good
On Tue, 23 Oct 2001, Martin Schulze wrote:
John Galt wrote:
It really didn't need to go to -devel in the first place: this is internal
to debian-security until there's a candidate. Folloups redirected.
Err... you have noticed that there are already two people filling
this position, haven't
volunteer. If not, shut up. Throwing artifical
barriers at this office isn't going to add volunteers.
But it doesn't have to be someone who is already a Debian developer,
and I have no objection to fast-tracking their application.
--
Be Careful! I have a black belt in sna-fu!
Who is John
On Mon, 22 Oct 2001, Colin Phipps wrote:
On Mon, Oct 22, 2001 at 07:12:57AM -0600, John Galt wrote:
On 21 Oct 2001, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Q: Is a requirement being a Debian developer?
No. It is my understanding that it would be good
On 22 Oct 2001, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
John Galt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I take it then that you volunteer. If not, shut up. Throwing artifical
barriers at this office isn't going to add volunteers.
How is it a barrier?
It's an extra qualification. It's one that until you objected
message id's.
On Mon, Oct 22, 2001 at 09:43:05AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
John Galt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I take it then that you volunteer. If not, shut up. Throwing artifical
barriers at this office isn't going to add volunteers.
How is it a barrier
only if you have VB installed
---snip---
script language='VBScript'
---snip---
bye
Haris
--
I can be immature if I want to, because I'm mature enough to make my own
decisions.
Who is John Galt? [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PROTECTED]
Date: 1 Sep 2001 13:18:18 -
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: Is ident secure?
--
EMACS == Eight Megabytes And Constantly Swapping
Who is John Galt? [EMAIL PROTECTED], that's who!
PROTECTED]
Date: 1 Sep 2001 13:18:18 -
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: Is ident secure?
--
EMACS == Eight Megabytes And Constantly Swapping
Who is John Galt? [EMAIL PROTECTED], that's who!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE7kGHKqubYQA0P91YRAoJ0AJ9aV0PgvG/k5pqjKA8Vh2znFu5zEQCeKUeR
7a/oZf06K4/guyOyiDWGURM=
=4dRs
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
Sacred cows make the best burgers
Who is John Galt? [EMAIL PROTECTED
]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Sacred cows make the best burgers
Who is John Galt? [EMAIL PROTECTED], that's who!!!
of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Sacred cows make the best burgers
Who is John Galt? [EMAIL PROTECTED], that's who!!!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
%u00
00%u00=a HTTP/1.0 404 205
is my apache logs from several ip's. Anyone have an idea of what they are. I've got
about
20 of them. Is this 'Code Red' stuff ?
grt Wouter
--
EMACS == Eight Megabytes And Constantly Swapping
Who is John Galt? [EMAIL PROTECTED], that's who
%u00
00%u00=a HTTP/1.0 404 205
is my apache logs from several ip's. Anyone have an idea of what they are.
I've got about
20 of them. Is this 'Code Red' stuff ?
grt Wouter
--
EMACS == Eight Megabytes And Constantly Swapping
Who is John Galt? [EMAIL PROTECTED], that's who!
Master is kind,
Answering his FAQ quickly,
With thought and sarcasm.
John Galt ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Master is kind,
Answering his FAQ quickly,
With thought and sarcasm.
John Galt ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
of Phineas Taylor Barnum regarding fools and money?
Who is John Galt? [EMAIL PROTECTED], that's who!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
of Phineas Taylor Barnum regarding fools and money?
Who is John Galt? [EMAIL PROTECTED], that's who!
, because I'm mature enough to make my own
decisions.
Who is John Galt? [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to make my own
decisions.
Who is John Galt? [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Be Careful! I have a black belt in sna-fu!
Who is John Galt? [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Be Careful! I have a black belt in sna-fu!
Who is John Galt? [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Be Careful! I have a black belt in sna-fu!
Who is John Galt? [EMAIL PROTECTED]
of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Be Careful! I have a black belt in sna-fu!
Who is John Galt? [EMAIL PROTECTED]
o UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
The Internet must be a medium for it is neither Rare nor Well done!
a href="mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]"John Galt /a
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
The Internet must be a medium for it is neither Rare nor Well done!
a href=mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]John Galt /a
I filed a bug against hostname for this behavior. Perhaps I should refile
it against libc6... Doogie, if you're reading this and you beat me to the
punch, go for it...
On Tue, 9 Jan 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I got the following (alarming) messages on syslog:
Jan 8 13:34:23 yuban
On Thu, 28 Dec 2000, Andres Salomon wrote:
On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 04:46:00PM -0800, Joe Buck wrote:
Notice that security holes fall into classes? One category of hole
should be easy to eliminate from Debian by instituting a code auditing
requirement. I'm referring to insecure
On Thu, 28 Dec 2000, Andres Salomon wrote:
On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 04:46:00PM -0800, Joe Buck wrote:
Notice that security holes fall into classes? One category of hole
should be easy to eliminate from Debian by instituting a code auditing
requirement. I'm referring to insecure
, as the servers are on a costal defense battery 7NM off the coast
of the UK that has a habit of firing on unwanted visitors :)
--
a mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Who is John Galt?/a
Failure is not an option. It comes bundled with your Microsoft product.
-- Ferenc Mantfeld
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
, as the servers are on a costal defense battery 7NM off the coast
of the UK that has a habit of firing on unwanted visitors :)
--
a mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Who is John Galt?/a
Failure is not an option. It comes bundled with your Microsoft product.
-- Ferenc Mantfeld
68 matches
Mail list logo
