Re: VI wrapper for SUDO? - another bad way ??

2001-12-05 Thread Jules Bean
On Tue, Dec 04, 2001 at 08:44:34PM +0100, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: > You have a misinformation/misinterpretation there. It's not disabled, > it's simply not possible in the way scripts are run. They are passed to > the program that is given in it's first line, after the #! - or to the > current she

Re: VI wrapper for SUDO? - another bad way ??

2001-12-05 Thread Jules Bean
On Tue, Dec 04, 2001 at 08:44:34PM +0100, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: > You have a misinformation/misinterpretation there. It's not disabled, > it's simply not possible in the way scripts are run. They are passed to > the program that is given in it's first line, after the #! - or to the > current sh