Re: Secure remote syslogging?

2003-04-23 Thread Litzler Mihaly
Hello! On Thursday 24 April 2003 03:09, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > Depends on your switch. A dedicated device is a MUCH better idea. Okey. I understand, really thanks for the advice. However I'm also interested in that how secure is to create VLANs with for example a Cisco29xx and sep

Re: Secure remote syslogging?

2003-04-23 Thread Litzler Mihaly
Hi! On Thursday 24 April 2003 02:04, Kenneth R. van Wyk wrote: > Yes, a separate, isolated, network segment that is _only_ used for > administrative/management data. A separate NIC and hub for each cluster of How do you think switching a separate VLAN for this would be also secure enough? Is it

Re: Secure remote syslogging?

2003-04-23 Thread Litzler Mihaly
Hi! On Wednesday 23 April 2003 22:37, Kenneth R. van Wyk wrote: > If the business situation warrants the expense, then I advise my clients to > run an admin network on critical servers, with one hardened syslog server What do you mean on admin network? Simply add plus network interfaces to each