[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can everbody tell me where I can download PaX patch for debian kernel?
Maybe look into a bigger / more complete solution such as
http://www.grsecurity.net or SELinux?
grsecurity is highly configurable, just use the PaX features if You like
regards
Martin
--
To U
Adam Majer wrote:
This is not a newsgroup.
Sorry, I'm subscribed to so many usenet groups via
parallel-izing/synching mailing lists, I do lose track.
Martin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Oh, and please take this thread to debian-firewall, I think although it
certainly is security-related, that newsgroup still is the better choice
for firewall questions :-)
Martin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Alohá!
justme wrote:
I am new to IPChains and IPtables
welcome to the wonderful world of shooting Yourself in the foot ;-)
I don't know if it can change the IPCHAINS to something else?
with 'apt-get update && apt-get install iptables' You should be able to
get iptables which is the righfu
Jeremy Hewlett wrote:
You can look at /etc/gen-msg.map for a listing of all the
possible combinations you might see. The FAQ in section 4.32 also
describes this.
Must be a different than this one:
http://www.snort.org/docs/faq/1Q05/node55.html
I'm not sure if this is in the official manual or not
Alohá!
Not sure whether this belongs here but no one answered over at
debian-firewall - I've had strange results in my snort logs that I can't
really interpret, the sid 1 doesn't look like a "normal" snort result to
me and the owner of the machine (which happens to be a large
institution) says
Alohá!
Noah Meyerhans wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 09:14:05AM +0200, Sneferu wrote:
>
>> Looks like there are a lot of false positives on it.
>>
>
>
> It looks like there are a lot of false positives with chkrootkit in
> general. Seriously, has anybody here ever had chkrootkit detect an
> a
Alohá!
Noah Meyerhans wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 09:14:05AM +0200, Sneferu wrote:
>
>> Looks like there are a lot of false positives on it.
>>
>
>
> It looks like there are a lot of false positives with chkrootkit in
> general. Seriously, has anybody here ever had chkrootkit detect an
> ac
Alohá!
A little OT, but http://www.adamantix.org 's distro provides everything
and more SELinux has to offer while IMHO being a little easier to handle.
Don't want to discourage anybody from SELinux, especially not with
kernel 2.6 reaching production status, just my 2c ;-)
best regards
Mar
Alohá!
A little OT, but http://www.adamantix.org 's distro provides everything
and more SELinux has to offer while IMHO being a little easier to handle.
Don't want to discourage anybody from SELinux, especially not with
kernel 2.6 reaching production status, just my 2c ;-)
best regards
Martin
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 12.08.2003 at 23:20 Adam Majer wrote:
>On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 07:03:13PM +0200, Thijs Welman wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Thanks. I forgot to mantion that i am subscribed to
>> debian-security-announce as well (ofcourse ;)). As far as the kernel
>> updates
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 12.08.2003 at 23:20 Adam Majer wrote:
>On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 07:03:13PM +0200, Thijs Welman wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Thanks. I forgot to mantion that i am subscribed to
>> debian-security-announce as well (ofcourse ;)). As far as the kernel
>> updates
12 matches
Mail list logo
