Re: rbl's status?

2004-06-14 Thread Matthew Whitworth
Bernd Eckenfels wrote: In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: This sort of thing is why I would rather use any RBL within SpamAssassin, rather than at SMTP delivery time. Even if one of these services goes completely belly up and blacklists the world, I don't automatically lose mail from it.

Re: rbl's status?

2004-06-14 Thread Matthew Whitworth
Bernd Eckenfels wrote: In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: This sort of thing is why I would rather use any RBL within SpamAssassin, rather than at SMTP delivery time. Even if one of these services goes completely belly up and blacklists the world, I don't automatically lose mail from it.

Re: Procmail recipe for Nitwit unsubscribers who can't read DU sigs.

2004-01-02 Thread Matthew Whitworth
that I can debug. Matthew Whitworth s. keeling wrote: FYI, procmail users: This appears to work fairly well so far; fwiw: # # inept mailing list (un)su[b]?scribe attempts, and vacation dorks. # :0 HB * 1^0 ()(I will be out of the office|I will respond

time zone whackiness with snort/postgresql...

2003-08-14 Thread Matthew Whitworth
I just set up a Debian snort sensor logging to a postgresql database (on the same host) and noticed that the alerts in the database have timestamps seven hours earlier than their timestamps in the snort alert file. The seven hours is interesting because that's my current offset from GMT --

time zone whackiness with snort/postgresql...

2003-08-08 Thread Matthew Whitworth
I just set up a Debian snort sensor logging to a postgresql database (on the same host) and noticed that the alerts in the database have timestamps seven hours earlier than their timestamps in the snort alert file. The seven hours is interesting because that's my current offset from GMT --

activating an unconfigured interface using /etc/network/interfaces...?

2003-07-24 Thread Matthew Whitworth
I have a dual-homed host spanning two networks and I would like to leave one of its interfaces unconfigured so that I can use libpcap applications on that network unobserved. I can do this using the command string ifconfig eth1 0.0.0.0 up, but I was wondering if there was a way to do this

Re: activating an unconfigured interface using /etc/network/interfaces...?

2003-07-24 Thread Matthew Whitworth
-0700, Matthew Whitworth wrote: I have a dual-homed host spanning two networks and I would like to leave one of its interfaces unconfigured so that I can use libpcap applications on that network unobserved. I can do this using the command string ifconfig eth1 0.0.0.0 up, but I was wondering

activating an unconfigured interface using /etc/network/interfaces...?

2003-07-23 Thread Matthew Whitworth
I have a dual-homed host spanning two networks and I would like to leave one of its interfaces unconfigured so that I can use libpcap applications on that network unobserved. I can do this using the command string ifconfig eth1 0.0.0.0 up, but I was wondering if there was a way to do this