Re: idea for improving security

On Wed May 07, 2003 at 03:3721PM -0400, Robert B Wilson wrote: On Wed, 7 May 2003 08:53:40 +0200 Michael Bergbauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: If you think SSH (or any other component) is not trustworthy, just look for alternatives (or create them yourself). what would be a more secure

Re: idea for improving security

secure services on a server, and not to disguise unsecure ones in an obscure way. If you think SSH (or any other component) is not trustworthy, just look for alternatives (or create them yourself). -- Michael Bergbauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] use your idle CPU cycles - See http://www.distributed.net

Re: Have I been hacked?

May 7 14:49 still logged in team1pts/0blue99.ex.ac.uk Wed May 7 13:21 - 13:57 (00:35) Who is the user team1 I have run chkrootkit but nothing was found. That's exactly what chkrootkit can tell you - nothing found, but not nothing installed. -- Michael Bergbauer [EMAIL

Re: OpenSSH and debian?

missing something or what? I don't think Debian potato is vulnerable, as the security team usually backports the patches to the versions in a released version. So the 3.1p1 in Potato should have all necessary patches in place. -- Michael Bergbauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] use your idle CPU cycles - See

Re: found this in my /var/log/apache/access.log

- - No idea about that .. but its also Return Code 404, so probably nothing dangerous -- Michael Bergbauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] use your idle CPU cycles - See http://www.distributed.net for details. Visit our mud Geas at geas.franken.de Port

Re: Chkrootkit

software, probably use some useful way of intrusion detection like tripwire, and you should be on the safe side. -- Michael Bergbauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] use your idle CPU cycles - See http://www.distributed.net for details. Visit our mud Geas at geas.franken.de Port