Re: own kernel vs debian kernel

- Original Message - From: Johannes Holzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Luis Gomez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Dale Amon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sent: Sunday, April 13, 2003 8:10 AM Subject: Re: own kernel vs debian kernel > > It's much simpler by doing it the Debian way: and more secure, at least f

Denied ports 1339, 2049 and 2702

We use Debian (sid, 2.4.18 custom, libc6 2.2.5) box with iptables (1.2.6a) and Obsid's rc.firewall.iptables.dual (1.2b2) http://www.sentry.net/~obsid/IPTables/rc.scripts.dir/current as a firewall between private net and Internet. Every day we get a lot of DENIED PORT messages: [...] Apr 9 17:0

Denied ports 1339, 2049 and 2702

We use Debian (sid, 2.4.18 custom, libc6 2.2.5) box with iptables (1.2.6a) and Obsid's rc.firewall.iptables.dual (1.2b2) http://www.sentry.net/~obsid/IPTables/rc.scripts.dir/current as a firewall between private net and Internet. Every day we get a lot of DENIED PORT messages: [...] Apr 9 17:

Using which socket (Unix or TCP) is more secure.

To check mail for viruses I use sendmail milter, which connect to (commercial) antivirus program drweb. Both sendmail and drweb live on one debian linux host (behind a firewall), and can connect to each other over Unix socket or TCP socket. Ports for sendmail and drweb to communicate (in case of

Using which socket (Unix or TCP) is more secure.

To check mail for viruses I use sendmail milter, which connect to (commercial) antivirus program drweb. Both sendmail and drweb live on one debian linux host (behind a firewall), and can connect to each other over Unix socket or TCP socket. Ports for sendmail and drweb to communicate (in case o