Re: Security in a shell that starts ssh

Hi David! Well, in my case the terminal is an VT-100, so it's connected directly to the one of the serial ports of the server, so nothing's going wildly to the network in cleartext. I don't know about Xterminals, though... I guess they are networked, but I really don't know much about the protocol

Re: Security in a shell that starts ssh

Hi David! Well, in my case the terminal is an VT-100, so it's connected directly to the one of the serial ports of the server, so nothing's going wildly to the network in cleartext. I don't know about Xterminals, though... I guess they are networked, but I really don't know much about the protocol

Re: Security in a shell that starts ssh

Whoa! Amazing :) This is exactly the sort of feedback I expected, thanks a lot guys! I don't have trouble understanding your suggersions, my main delight comes from wondering how on earth can you think of so many tiny details :) And I thought I was paraonid :) Really, thanks a lot, that taught me q

Re: Security in a shell that starts ssh

Whoa! Amazing :) This is exactly the sort of feedback I expected, thanks a lot guys! I don't have trouble understanding your suggersions, my main delight comes from wondering how on earth can you think of so many tiny details :) And I thought I was paraonid :) Really, thanks a lot, that taught me

Security in a shell that starts ssh

Hi all! We have several vt-100 terminal that log to the naub server at our office. Still, some users without account in the main server would like to login to another machine, so I was planning on creating a passwordless acount with a shell that's a program that asks for usernames and then execs ss

Security in a shell that starts ssh

Hi all! We have several vt-100 terminal that log to the naub server at our office. Still, some users without account in the main server would like to login to another machine, so I was planning on creating a passwordless acount with a shell that's a program that asks for usernames and then execs s

potential buffer overflow in xinetd-2.1.8.9pre11-1 (fwd)

Hi there! What do you think of this? is 2.1.8.8 vulnerable? I checked the source code for my potato xinetd and it doesn't look like it is... Any opinions? Miquel Martín - Forwarded message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Post:

potential buffer overflow in xinetd-2.1.8.9pre11-1 (fwd)

Hi there! What do you think of this? is 2.1.8.8 vulnerable? I checked the source code for my potato xinetd and it doesn't look like it is... Any opinions? Miquel Martín - Forwarded message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Post

bogus packet size. did I get DoSed?

Hi all, Without no apparent reason, I started receiving thousands of packets to one of the interfaces. The network card is an rtl8029, and I logged between 70 and 80.000 packacges per second. They all where too big to be ethernet packets, and they were reported by the kernel as: Jun 4 12:20:15 ne

bogus packet size. did I get DoSed?

Hi all, Without no apparent reason, I started receiving thousands of packets to one of the interfaces. The network card is an rtl8029, and I logged between 70 and 80.000 packacges per second. They all where too big to be ethernet packets, and they were reported by the kernel as: Jun 4 12:20:15 n