)
* get md5sums also from a .deb file
* Standards-Version: 3.5.5
* OK. debsums_gen is not rewritten, so it ignores diverted files, but
hey, it's still experimental
I'de like a feedback mainly on handling of diverted files.
Thanks
Petr Cech
)
* get md5sums also from a .deb file
* Standards-Version: 3.5.5
* OK. debsums_gen is not rewritten, so it ignores diverted files, but
hey, it's still experimental
I'de like a feedback mainly on handling of diverted files.
Thanks
Petr Cech
ttp://ftp.debian.org/debian dists/proposed-updates/
> but that blew big chunks.
just tried. works OK
Petr Cech
--
Debian GNU/Linux maintainer - www.debian.{org,cz}
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Resistance is futile. You all will be packaged
27;t see the problem. maybe it was not at the exact time, as gnupg fix ...
Petr Cech
--
Debian GNU/Linux maintainer - www.debian.{org,cz}
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
the UNIX trademark has changed hands so much no one is quite sure who
really owns it anymore
ttp://ftp.debian.org/debian dists/proposed-updates/
> but that blew big chunks.
just tried. works OK
Petr Cech
--
Debian GNU/Linux maintainer - www.debian.{org,cz}
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Resistance is futile. You all will be packaged
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
27;t see the problem. maybe it was not at the exact time, as gnupg fix ...
Petr Cech
--
Debian GNU/Linux maintainer - www.debian.{org,cz}
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
the UNIX trademark has changed hands so much no one is quite sure who really
owns it anymore
--
n and user
> of the distro - has always been the much higher technical quality; having a
> supposed "fix" cause another part of Debian to break seems quite
> antithetical to that quality.
1) don't fix <= not an option
2) fork <= really no
3) fix and fix the break
On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 12:11:39PM -0700 , Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> Petr Cech <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 10:55:04AM -0700 , Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> > > Debian is about a *distribution* and not a random assemblage of
> >
&
n and user
> of the distro - has always been the much higher technical quality; having a
> supposed "fix" cause another part of Debian to break seems quite
> antithetical to that quality.
1) don't fix <= not an option
2) fork <= really no
3) fix and fix the break
On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 10:55:04AM -0700 , Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> Debian is about a *distribution* and not a random assemblage of
OK, distribution. That's dists/potato/main/binary-/Packages
Petr Cech
--
Debian GNU/Linux maintainer - www.debian
On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 12:11:39PM -0700 , Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> Petr Cech <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 10:55:04AM -0700 , Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> > > Debian is about a *distribution* and not a random assemblage of
> &
On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 10:55:04AM -0700 , Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> Debian is about a *distribution* and not a random assemblage of
OK, distribution. That's dists/potato/main/binary-/Packages
Petr Cech
--
Debian GNU/Linux maintainer - www.debian
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 11:11:13AM +0200 , Gerhard Kroder wrote:
> Petr Cech wrote:
>
> > also there are now signed Packages files on mirrors, so you can just check
> > the Packages and MD5 sums of .deb files it contains.
>
> Is there a way (already existing or seen fo
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 11:11:13AM +0200 , Gerhard Kroder wrote:
> Petr Cech wrote:
>
> > also there are now signed Packages files on mirrors, so you can just check
> > the Packages and MD5 sums of .deb files it contains.
>
> Is there a way (already existing or seen fo
signed Packages files on mirrors, so you can just check
the Packages and MD5 sums of .deb files it contains. Note that apt does MD5
check the file after download
Petr Cech
--
Debian GNU/Linux maintainer - www.debian.{org,cz}
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Digital Elec
signed Packages files on mirrors, so you can just check
the Packages and MD5 sums of .deb files it contains. Note that apt does MD5
check the file after download
Petr Cech
--
Debian GNU/Linux maintainer - www.debian.{org,cz}
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Digital Elec
libssl0.9.6 or recompile ssh
Petr Cech
--
Debian GNU/Linux maintainer - www.debian.{org,cz}
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Computers are useless. They can only give answers."Pablo Picasso
libssl0.9.6 or recompile ssh
Petr Cech
--
Debian GNU/Linux maintainer - www.debian.{org,cz}
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Computers are useless. They can only give answers."Pablo Picasso
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 03:33:32PM +0700 , [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> Can someone advise me to place where i can obtain some kind of
> "official" md5 sums of packages included in 2.2r2? Didn't found
Packages
Petr Cech
--
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 03:33:32PM +0700 , [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> Can someone advise me to place where i can obtain some kind of
> "official" md5 sums of packages included in 2.2r2? Didn't found
Packages
Petr Cech
--
e
goes half day is not really critical. It may even happen unstable has the
fix earlier, because of new upstream or such, so the bug may not ever appear
there
Petr Cech
--
Debian GNU/Linux maintainer - www.debian.{org,cz}
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Digital Electronic
e
goes half day is not really critical. It may even happen unstable has the
fix earlier, because of new upstream or such, so the bug may not ever appear
there
Petr Cech
--
Debian GNU/Linux maintainer - www.debian.{org,cz}
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Digital Elec
n the command line. a message, "Failed
try running ssh -v do see, why it disallowed the access.
Petr Cech
--
Debian GNU/Linux maintainer - www.debian.{org,cz}
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian - It is all about choice, baby!!
d" on the command line. a message, "Failed
try running ssh -v do see, why it disallowed the access.
Petr Cech
--
Debian GNU/Linux maintainer - www.debian.{org,cz}
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian - It is all about choice, baby!!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, e
On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 09:11:45PM + , Nick Phillips wrote:
> Petr Cech wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 09:29:01AM +0100 , Rolf Kutz wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I have a Problem with inetd and exim. Exim is
> > > triggert, although i
On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 09:11:45PM + , Nick Phillips wrote:
> Petr Cech wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 09:29:01AM +0100 , Rolf Kutz wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I have a Problem with inetd and exim. Exim is
> > > triggert, although i
easier :)
> instead?
>
> - Rolf
Petr Cech
--
Debian GNU/Linux maintainer - www.debian.{org,cz}
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phear my "Typical bloody smart-arse debian attitude."
h a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Petr Cech
--
Debian GNU/Linux maintainer - www.debian.{org,cz}
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<_Anarchy_> telsa: rommable debian will be potato chips
easier :)
> instead?
>
> - Rolf
Petr Cech
--
Debian GNU/Linux maintainer - www.debian.{org,cz}
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phear my "Typical bloody smart-arse debian attitude."
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
h a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Petr Cech
--
Debian GNU/Linux maintainer - www.debian.{org,cz}
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<_Anarchy_> telsa: rommable debian will be potato chips
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAI
es
> - new features only appear in proposed-updates
no. (mostly) only in woody
> - I should use potato security fixes with woody
if you can ... like php updates for potato won't install on woody
upgrade to latest woody intead
Petr Cech
--
es
> - new features only appear in proposed-updates
no. (mostly) only in woody
> - I should use potato security fixes with woody
if you can ... like php updates for potato won't install on woody
upgrade to latest woody intead
Petr Cech
--
m? Oh, and does it contain the security
> fixes for nonus packages (if any)?
yes
Petr Cech
--
Debian GNU/Linux maintainer - www.debian.{org,cz}
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Joy notes some people think "Unix" is a misspelling of "Unics" which is a
misspelling of "Emacs" :)
m? Oh, and does it contain the security
> fixes for nonus packages (if any)?
yes
Petr Cech
--
Debian GNU/Linux maintainer - www.debian.{org,cz}
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Joy notes some people think "Unix" is a misspelling of "Unics&
to slink,
libsafe doesn't work with glibc 2.0?
> you'll have to upgrade to potato (or create a slink system with a lot
> potato, but that might cause problems, I never tried) to use libsafe.
but if it does, that you can trry to recompile it on your slink box.
to slink,
libsafe doesn't work with glibc 2.0?
> you'll have to upgrade to potato (or create a slink system with a lot
> potato, but that might cause problems, I never tried) to use libsafe.
but if it does, that you can trry to recompile it on your slink box.
r user nobody by (uid=0)
I'd say, it's the daily cron job. nobody is for find and www-data for some
apache stuff or dwww.
Petr Cech
--
Debian GNU/Linux maintainer - www.debian.{org,cz}
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<_Anarchy_> telsa: rommable debian will be potato chips
ed for user nobody by (uid=0)
I'd say, it's the daily cron job. nobody is for find and www-data for some
apache stuff or dwww.
Petr Cech
--
Debian GNU/Linux maintainer - www.debian.{org,cz}
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<_Anarchy_> telsa: rommable
hjis will only work with exim in inetd.conf. exim is NOT linked with libwrap0
because of "historical" reasons :(
> conections. sendmail seems to be linked against libwrap0, hence I gues, it
Petr Cech
--
Debian GNU/Linux maintainer - www.debian.{org,cz}
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
;t they need a running
> daemon? of course, they probably would get sent when a new mail is sent,
> but this may be ages later ...
what aour runq using cron?
Petr Cech
--
Debian GNU/Linux maintainer - www.debian.{org,cz}
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
40 matches
Mail list logo
