Re: A more secure form of .htaccess?

2002-04-27 Thread Schusselig Brane
Steve Mickeler wrote: > > Trust not in switches. > > They too can be easily manipulated unless you have locked them down at a > mac address and port level. > > 'apt-get install dsniff' ; 'man arpspoof' Of course, which is one of the things I had in mind when I said: > > topology. Switches tend

Re: A more secure form of .htaccess?

2002-04-27 Thread Schusselig Brane
Steve Mickeler wrote: > > Trust not in switches. > > They too can be easily manipulated unless you have locked them down at a > mac address and port level. > > 'apt-get install dsniff' ; 'man arpspoof' Of course, which is one of the things I had in mind when I said: > > topology. Switches ten

Re: A more secure form of .htaccess?

2002-04-26 Thread Schusselig Brane
Tom Dominico wrote: > > Hello all, > > I have written some php-based internal systems for our users. Users are > required to authenticate to access this system, and their login > determines what they are allowed to do within the system. I am > concerned that their logging in with cleartext pass

Re: A more secure form of .htaccess?

2002-04-25 Thread Schusselig Brane
Tom Dominico wrote: > > Hello all, > > I have written some php-based internal systems for our users. Users are > required to authenticate to access this system, and their login > determines what they are allowed to do within the system. I am > concerned that their logging in with cleartext pas