On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 02:11:00PM +0200, InfoEmergencias - Luis Gómez wrote:
> IMHO, we'd better set it to no. I always thought it was much better. Is
> there any landscape in which you may want to allow direct root login to
> your host?
Yes, there is. For example I have some servers that retrie
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 09:34:35AM +0100, Robert van der Meulen wrote:
> Quoting James ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > We could start by blocking @aol.com =)
> Or by all running good anti-spam measures and not replying to spam; I didn't
> even know it was there until people started replying to it, and i
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 09:34:35AM +0100, Robert van der Meulen wrote:
> Quoting James ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > We could start by blocking @aol.com =)
> Or by all running good anti-spam measures and not replying to spam; I didn't
> even know it was there until people started replying to it, and
On Wed, Nov 21, 2001 at 12:47:49AM -0600, Bryan Andersen wrote:
> On thing I think is quite important is to get rid of calls to
> routines that it is possible to buffer overflow. OpenBSD has a
> "feature" in their version of gcc that will cause a compile time
> error message telling you when o
On Wed, Nov 21, 2001 at 12:47:49AM -0600, Bryan Andersen wrote:
> On thing I think is quite important is to get rid of calls to
> routines that it is possible to buffer overflow. OpenBSD has a
> "feature" in their version of gcc that will cause a compile time
> error message telling you when
On Sat, Sep 01, 2001 at 06:41:42AM -0400, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> "Layne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > OK they just keep coming. I had 8 messages at 11:00PM , all of who I knew.
> > Now I have 227 in my in box of solicitors all of who I didn't subscribe to.
> > And you wonder why I get mad.
>
> D
On Sat, Sep 01, 2001 at 06:41:42AM -0400, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> "Layne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > OK they just keep coming. I had 8 messages at 11:00PM , all of who I knew.
> > Now I have 227 in my in box of solicitors all of who I didn't subscribe to.
> > And you wonder why I get mad.
>
>
On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 11:03:41AM +0300, Juha Jäykkä wrote:
> Anyone care to help me: I need some _strong_ points in favour of
> Debian, against SuSE. No crap, please. I need to presuade my superiors
> to turn from RH to Debian instead of SuSE as they would like to do. I
> need strong evidence
On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 11:03:41AM +0300, Juha Jäykkä wrote:
> Anyone care to help me: I need some _strong_ points in favour of
> Debian, against SuSE. No crap, please. I need to presuade my superiors
> to turn from RH to Debian instead of SuSE as they would like to do. I
> need strong evidence
On Wed, Jun 14, 2000 at 02:10:09PM +0100, Zak Kipling wrote:
> I'm no PAM or SMB expert, but I would imagine (if it hasn't been done) it
> would be feasible to make a stacked "password" module to do the reverse,
> ie to update the SMB password (including optionally creating the entry in
> the smbp
On Wed, Jun 14, 2000 at 02:10:09PM +0100, Zak Kipling wrote:
> I'm no PAM or SMB expert, but I would imagine (if it hasn't been done) it
> would be feasible to make a stacked "password" module to do the reverse,
> ie to update the SMB password (including optionally creating the entry in
> the smb
On Tue, Jun 13, 2000 at 03:46:12PM -0700, Ryan White wrote:
> As I recall after windows 95 the passwords are sent over the line
> encrypted. The encryption might be weak but they are not clear text
> anymore.
> There is a switch in SMB to allow encrypted passwords. This is ON by
> default in deb
On Tue, Jun 13, 2000 at 03:46:12PM -0700, Ryan White wrote:
> As I recall after windows 95 the passwords are sent over the line
> encrypted. The encryption might be weak but they are not clear text
> anymore.
> There is a switch in SMB to allow encrypted passwords. This is ON by
> default in de
On Mon, Jun 05, 2000 at 04:17:41AM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
> i don't think it is necessary (or really desirable) to have the
> postinst asking about running bind as root, i think that the number of
> people who need it is far to small to justify ya interuption in the
> system install.
I tend
14 matches
Mail list logo
