Re: on potato's proftpd

2002-04-06 Thread Stephen Ryan
On Fri, 2002-04-05 at 21:54, Petro wrote: On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 06:24:18PM +, Martin WHEELER wrote: Fine. You wear the same size suit from birth to death; me, I'll adjust according to circumstances. You *like* upgrading 100 servers every few days? Certainly. Compared to

Re: on potato's proftpd

2002-04-06 Thread Stephen Ryan
On Fri, 2002-04-05 at 21:54, Petro wrote: On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 06:24:18PM +, Martin WHEELER wrote: Fine. You wear the same size suit from birth to death; me, I'll adjust according to circumstances. You *like* upgrading 100 servers every few days? Certainly. Compared to

RE: Hacked too?

2002-01-11 Thread Stephen Ryan
On Fri, 2002-01-11 at 17:49, Igor Balusov wrote: What is mean: If you're running PortSentry/klaxon or another program that binds itself to unused ports probably chkrootkit will give you a false positive on the bindshell test (ports .. 31336/tcp, 31337/tcp ...).? It is from

RE: Hacked too?

2002-01-11 Thread Stephen Ryan
On Fri, 2002-01-11 at 17:49, Igor Balusov wrote: What is mean: If you're running PortSentry/klaxon or another program that binds itself to unused ports probably chkrootkit will give you a false positive on the bindshell test (ports .. 31336/tcp, 31337/tcp ...).? It is from