.
Kind regards,
Tarjei
--
Tarjei Huse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
input.
Tarjei
input.
Tarjei
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
O to complicated for my needs and tinyca (that many on this list
suggested) that doesn't (please correct me if I'm wrong) give me the
finished scripts for importing certs in outlook, IE, Mozilla and other
programs.
If there are other alternatives out there, please let me know. Again,
IMHO to complicated for my needs and tinyca (that many on this list
suggested) that doesn't (please correct me if I'm wrong) give me the
finished scripts for importing certs in outlook, IE, Mozilla and other
programs.
If there are other alternatives out there, please let me know. Again, I
thank you for your contributions.
Tarjei
> noah
>
a way to organize certificare revocationlists etc.
What are the alternatives besides OpenCA? Does anyone know of a set of
scipts that are a bit less complex and at the same time gives me some of
the same functionality?
Tarjei
ay to organize certificare revocationlists etc.
What are the alternatives besides OpenCA? Does anyone know of a set of
scipts that are a bit less complex and at the same time gives me some of
the same functionality?
Tarjei
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "u
This might help:
http://jimsun.linxnet.com/misc/postfix-anti-UCE.txt
On Mon, 2003-08-11 at 13:37, Marcel Weber wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> Am Montag, 11.08.03, um 12:59 Uhr (Europe/Zurich) schrieb Tomasz
> Papszun:
> >>
> >
> > If you want to prevent them fr
This might help:
http://jimsun.linxnet.com/misc/postfix-anti-UCE.txt
On Mon, 2003-08-11 at 13:37, Marcel Weber wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> Am Montag, 11.08.03, um 12:59 Uhr (Europe/Zurich) schrieb Tomasz
> Papszun:
> >>
> >
> > If you want to prevent them fr
erouted to another
> box on the LAN, and I'd like to leave that set up as is, if possible.
How about setting your ssh server to another port?
If your friends know about it, this shouldn't be a problem.
Tarjei
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
erouted to another
> box on the LAN, and I'd like to leave that set up as is, if possible.
How about setting your ssh server to another port?
If your friends know about it, this shouldn't be a problem.
Tarjei
lems? Does anyone know of when
we'll see nfs v4 and what it's security features are?
Regarding AFS/Kerberos, isn't openafs an OSS solution?
Tarjei
lems? Does anyone know of when
we'll see nfs v4 and what it's security features are?
Regarding AFS/Kerberos, isn't openafs an OSS solution?
Tarjei
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ldap users.
Now, the last thing: Does anyone have a URL for the SFS fileserver
system?
Tarjei
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ldap users.
Now, the last thing: Does anyone have a URL for the SFS fileserver
system?
Tarjei
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ut commiting to writing _the_
authorative work on securing bind.
I usually try to contribute the knowledge I get from maillinglists to
faq's and comments if it's easy to do so, f.x to contribute comments to
php.
Would it be possible to add this?
Tarjei
estion to update the docs without commiting to writing _the_
authorative work on securing bind.
I usually try to contribute the knowledge I get from maillinglists to
faq's and comments if it's easy to do so, f.x to contribute comments to
php.
Would it be possible to add this?
Tarjei
--
you can update twice daily for the best
results.
Tarjei
trying hard to stay away from a religious war, i am keeping this as
factual as possible. postfix and qmail don't really have any functional
differences. both can do the same, both have the same features, and both
are very powerful
with crontab and you can update twice daily for the best
results.
Tarjei
>
>trying hard to stay away from a religious war, i am keeping this as
>factual as possible. postfix and qmail don't really have any functional
>differences. both can do the same, both have the same features,
rants. Will stop now.
Tarjei
defining a stable version
of each package, and saying that stable is a dynamic target. In the age
of highspeed conections, most most people could then install debian over
the 'net instead of the install cd's.
I apoligize to all the people reading this list for filling it with
rants. Wi
ogin.
I know this is a rant, but maybe it would be wise to think of a way to
implement this. At least, put more deamons in chroot jails and get
libsafe compiled into every package.
Tarjei
ssh2 & root login.
I know this is a rant, but maybe it would be wise to think of a way to
implement this. At least, put more deamons in chroot jails and get
libsafe compiled into every package.
Tarjei
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks to everyone who answered. I think I found the answer:
I got three apps who has been installed --with-prefix=/usr/local/appname
Their pidfiles will then be in /usr/local/app/var/ not?
Thus they will not be in the mentioned places, am I correct?
(suspecting I am not ;( )
Tarjei
Petre
Thanks, I got:
dev_to_tty
tdev
/dev/pts/%s
/dev/%s
/dev/tty%s
/dev/pty%s
/dev/%snsole
Obsolete W option not supported. (You have a /dev/drum?)
Any comments? Does this look ok?
Tarjei
Petre Daniel wrote:
>
> -Mesaj original-
> De la: Tarjei Huse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks to everyone who answered. I think I found the answer:
I got three apps who has been installed --with-prefix=/usr/local/appname
Their pidfiles will then be in /usr/local/app/var/ not?
Thus they will not be in the mentioned places, am I correct?
(suspecting I am not ;( )
Tarjei
Petre
Thanks, I got:
dev_to_tty
tdev
/dev/pts/%s
/dev/%s
/dev/tty%s
/dev/pty%s
/dev/%snsole
Obsolete W option not supported. (You have a /dev/drum?)
Any comments? Does this look ok?
Tarjei
Petre Daniel wrote:
>
> -Mesaj original-
> De la: Tarjei Huse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
ue? And would that be the answer to the question of what these 3
pids are? (nmap on my host returns notthing).
Tarjei
Here's the output I got:
pid: 1 init [3]
pid: 1001 lsarpcd-D
pid: 1003 srvsvcd-D
pid: 1005 winregd-D
pid: 1007 wkssvcd-D
pid: 1010 spoolssd-D
pid: 1027 svcctld-D
pid: 1050
Could this be caused because I do not have all pids in the same dir?
Tarjei
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Hi If I run chkproc from the chkrootid package I get:
> > You have 3 process hidden for readdir command
> > You have 3 process hidden for ps command
> &g
Hi If I run chkproc from the chkrootid package I get:
You have 3 process hidden for readdir command
You have 3 process hidden for ps command
How can I find these processes?
Tarjei
ue? And would that be the answer to the question of what these 3
pids are? (nmap on my host returns notthing).
Tarjei
Here's the output I got:
pid: 1 init [3]
pid: 1001 lsarpcd-D
pid: 1003 srvsvcd-D
pid: 1005 winregd-D
pid: 1007 wkssvcd-D
pid: 1010 spoolssd-D
pid: 1027 svcctld-D
pid: 1050
Could this be caused because I do not have all pids in the same dir?
Tarjei
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Hi If I run chkproc from the chkrootid package I get:
> > You have 3 process hidden for readdir command
> > You have 3 process hidden for ps command
> &g
Hi If I run chkproc from the chkrootid package I get:
You have 3 process hidden for readdir command
You have 3 process hidden for ps command
How can I find these processes?
Tarjei
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Cont
or the Securing Debian HOW-TO, it appears
to be down too
http://joker.rhwd.de/doc/Securing-Debian-HOWTO/Securing-Debian-HOWTO.htm
You can also download an exaple Debian IPtables script from:
http://www.debiandiary.f2s.com/files/iptables.sh
Yours,
Tarjei
> thx for the patience...
>
>
or the Securing Debian HOW-TO, it appears
to be down too
http://joker.rhwd.de/doc/Securing-Debian-HOWTO/Securing-Debian-HOWTO.htm
You can also download an exaple Debian IPtables script from:
http://www.debiandiary.f2s.com/files/iptables.sh
Yours,
Tarjei
> thx for the patience...
>
>
35 matches
Mail list logo
