Re: attack of the marsians

2002-06-11 Thread Thomas Thurman
On Tue, 11 Jun 2002, Proud Debian-User wrote: > Jun 11 19:01:14 abyss kernel: martian source 10.10.151.255 from > 10.10.151.43, on dev eth0 > Jun 11 19:03:19 abyss kernel: martian source 10.10.150.1 from 10.10.151.43, > on dev eth0 > > in the last 5 days these logging messages increases. > Normall

Re: SSH2 Encryption

2002-06-10 Thread Thomas Thurman
On Mon, 10 Jun 2002, Robert van der Meulen wrote: > Quoting Anne Carasik ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > This one time, Jeff Bonner wrote: > > > 3) Any reason you *wouldn't* want to use compression in SSH? > > > > Yes, if you're going over a high speed line, no reason to use > > compression. If you're co

Re: ROUTEUR ET IDENTD

2002-06-08 Thread Thomas Thurman
On Sat, 8 Jun 2002, Chris Lewis wrote: > I don't mean this to be sarcastic. .. it may have been attempted or > may already exist - I am internationally ignorant, though wish I were > not so .. why do we not have an RFC that documents the Official > (Written/Typed) Language of Communications for the

Re: secure file transfer (again)

2002-06-06 Thread Thomas Thurman
On Thu, 6 Jun 2002, Andrew Ferrier wrote: > For Windows, the ssh client from www.ssh.com is the best I've > found. Don't know if free for university use though. If you > want a free client, WinSCP is best I've used, though it's far > more buggy than the aforementioned. PSCP and PSFTP (part of the

Re: default Apache configuration

2002-03-12 Thread Thomas Thurman
On Tue, 12 Mar 2002, Ralf Dreibrodt wrote: > tail -n 1 /var/log/apache/access.log > 127.0.0.1 - - [12/Mar/2002:13:53:15 +0100] "GET > /cgi-bin/login.pl?user=admin&password=tztztz HTTP/1.1" 200 148 > > to whom belongs this problem? > > the programmer, who used GET for a login or the sysadmin who s

Re: default Apache configuration

2002-03-12 Thread Thomas Thurman
On Tue, 12 Mar 2002, Ralf Dreibrodt wrote: > tail -n 1 /var/log/apache/access.log > 127.0.0.1 - - [12/Mar/2002:13:53:15 +0100] "GET > /cgi-bin/login.pl?user=admin&password=tztztz HTTP/1.1" 200 148 > > to whom belongs this problem? > > the programmer, who used GET for a login or the sysadmin who

Re: Mailserver HDD organization

2002-01-19 Thread Thomas Thurman
On Sat, 19 Jan 2002, Johannes Weiss wrote: > 220 yellow.csi.cam.ac.uk ESMTP Exim 3.22 #1 Sat, 19 Jan 2002 19:01:26 + > * It says that it's Exim [...] > > I wouldn't always believe the version reported by a large mail server. > ACK, but the "is syntactically correct" is an Exim proof I think.

Re: Mailserver HDD organization

2002-01-19 Thread Thomas Thurman
On Sat, 19 Jan 2002, Johannes Weiss wrote: > 220 yellow.csi.cam.ac.uk ESMTP Exim 3.22 #1 Sat, 19 Jan 2002 19:01:26 + > * It says that it's Exim [...] > > I wouldn't always believe the version reported by a large mail server. > ACK, but the "is syntactically correct" is an Exim proof I think.

Re: Mailserver HDD organization

2002-01-19 Thread Thomas Thurman
On Sat, 19 Jan 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > das exim not handle a big mail site like 1000 users? Hm, well, Cambridge University, home of Exim, has what, several tens of thousands? They seem to be doing OK with Exim: $ telnet hermes.cam.ac.uk smtp Trying 131.111.8.67... Connected to yellow.csi.

Re: Mailserver HDD organization

2002-01-19 Thread Thomas Thurman
On Sat, 19 Jan 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > das exim not handle a big mail site like 1000 users? Hm, well, Cambridge University, home of Exim, has what, several tens of thousands? They seem to be doing OK with Exim: $ telnet hermes.cam.ac.uk smtp Trying 131.111.8.67... Connected to yellow.csi

Re: i am experincing intrusion attempts

2001-09-18 Thread Thomas Thurman
On Tue, 18 Sep 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I need to trace the person who is hitting on my pc 40 times a day. > Any ideas? It's very likely to be the new worm. 40 times a day is quite a light load: we've had over a thousand here in about three hours.

Re: i am experincing intrusion attempts

2001-09-18 Thread Thomas Thurman
On Tue, 18 Sep 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I need to trace the person who is hitting on my pc 40 times a day. > Any ideas? It's very likely to be the new worm. 40 times a day is quite a light load: we've had over a thousand here in about three hours.