n the archive.
>
I totally understand that storage is not infinite and that space must be made
sometimes.
However, wouldn't be automatic and systematic purge contrary to the purpose of
snapshot.debian.org? Or maybe would it be an exception here because we have no
choice?
Thanks in advance.
l0f4r0
is
vulnerable of fixed.
NB: The Package Tracker already mentions the backports versions (bpo) when
available.
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2022/03/msg00081.html
[2] https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2022/03/msg00323.html
Thank you in advance.
Best regards,
l0f4r0
able.
I've been using it for 1 year on Linux/macOS/Windows and heard/read almost only
good feedbacks.
Best regards,
l0f4r0
183,
packaging it accordingly and pushing in a new version in Debian repositories?
For Buster, will it lead eventually to a 83.0.4103.116-1~deb10uX or a
86.0.4240.183~deb10uX version instead?
Thanks in advance & Best regards,
l0f4r0
[1] : https://security.archlinux.org/CVE-2020-16009
g/tracker/source-package/chromium
See "vulnerable" in 2nd column for CVE-2020-15967 to CVE-2020-15992 +
CVE-2020-6557
Best regards,
l0f4r0
se do this ecological contribution ..
>
Obviously you don't know that such action must be done by yourself:
https://www.debian.org/MailingLists/unsubscribe
Best regards,
l0f4r0
6 matches
Mail list logo